Literature DB >> 27290635

Assessing the predictive accuracy of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Project Surgical Risk Calculator in open ventral hernia repair.

Marten N Basta1, Andrew R Bauder2, Stephen J Kovach2, John P Fischer3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Preoperative surgical risk assessment continues to be a critical component of clinical decision-making. The ACS Universal Risk Calculator estimates risk for several outcomes based on individual risk profiles. Although this represents a tremendous step toward improving outcomes, studies have reported inaccuracies among certain patient populations. This study aimed to assess the predictive accuracy of the American College of Surgeons' (ACS) Risk Calculator in patients undergoing open ventral hernia repair (VHR).
METHODS: A review of patients undergoing open, isolated VHR between 7/1/2007 and 7/1/2014 by a single surgeon was performed. Risk factors and outcomes were collected as defined by National Surgical Quality Improvement Project. Thirty-day outcomes included serious complication, venous thromboembolism, medical morbidity, surgical site infection (SSI), unplanned reoperation, mortality, and length of stay (LOS). Patient profiles were entered into the ACS Surgical Risk Calculator and outcome-specific risk predictions recorded. Prediction accuracy was assessed using the Brier score and receiver-operator area under the curve (AUC).
RESULTS: One hundred forty-two patients undergoing open VHR were included. ACS predictions were accurate for cardiac complications (Brier = .02), venous thromboembolism (Brier = .08), reoperation (Brier = .10), and mortality (Brier = .01). Significantly, underestimated outcomes included SSI (Brier = .14), serious complication (Brier = .30), and any complication (Brier = .34). Discrimination ranged from highly accurate (mortality, AUC = .99) to indiscriminate (SSI, AUC = .57). Predicted LOS was 3-fold shorter than observed (2.4 vs 7.4 days, P <.001).
CONCLUSIONS: The ACS Surgical Risk Calculator accurately predicted medical complications, reoperation, and 30-day mortality. However, SSIs, serious complications, and LOS were significantly underestimated. These findings suggest that additional considerations are needed to better estimate complications after open VHR.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hernia repair; Risk modeling; Risk stratification; Surgical complications; Surgical outcomes; Ventral hernia

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27290635     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2016.01.034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  8 in total

1.  Foramen of Winslow hernia: a minimally invasive approach.

Authors:  Cristina R Harnsberger; Elisabeth C McLemore; Ryan C Broderick; Hans F Fuchs; Peter T Yu; Martin Berducci; Catherine Beck; Moneer Almadani; Garth R Jacobsen; Santiago Horgan
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-11-01       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Comparison of Internal Medicine and General Surgery Residents' Assessments of Risk of Postsurgical Complications in Surgically Complex Patients.

Authors:  James M. Healy; Kimberly A. Davis; Kevin Y. Pei
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 14.766

3.  MELD-Na score associated with postoperative complications in hernia repair in non-cirrhotic patients.

Authors:  K A Schlosser; A M Kao; Y Zhang; T Prasad; K R Kasten; B R Davis; B T Heniford; P D Colavita
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2018-11-16       Impact factor: 4.739

4.  Leveraging Decision Curve Analysis to Improve Clinical Application of Surgical Risk Calculators.

Authors:  Esmaeel Reza Dadashzadeh; Patrick Bou-Samra; Lauren V Huckaby; Giacomo Nebbia; Robert M Handzel; Patrick R Varley; Shandong Wu; Allan Tsung
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2021-01-05       Impact factor: 2.192

5.  Incorporating Outcomes that Matter to Older Adults into Surgical Research.

Authors:  Carling Cheung; Matthew A Meissner; Tullika Garg
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2021-01-18       Impact factor: 5.562

6.  Predicting complications of major head and neck oncological surgery: an evaluation of the ACS NSQIP surgical risk calculator.

Authors:  Peter S Vosler; Mario Orsini; Danny J Enepekides; Kevin M Higgins
Journal:  J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2018-03-22

7.  A non-linear ensemble model-based surgical risk calculator for mixed data from multiple surgical fields.

Authors:  Ruoyu Liu; Xin Lai; Jiayin Wang; Xuanping Zhang; Xiaoyan Zhu; Paul B S Lai; Ci-Ren Guo
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2021-07-30       Impact factor: 2.796

8.  Surgical Predictive Model for Breast Cancer Patients Assessing Acute Postoperative Complications: The Breast Cancer Surgery Risk Calculator.

Authors:  Michael M Jonczyk; Carla Suzanne Fisher; Russell Babbitt; Jessica K Paulus; Karen M Freund; Brian Czerniecki; Julie A Margenthaler; Albert Losken; Abhishek Chatterjee
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-02-22       Impact factor: 4.339

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.