Literature DB >> 27289250

Assessing analytical comparability of biosimilars: GCSF as a case study.

Neh Nupur1, Sumit Kumar Singh1, Gunjan Narula1, Anurag S Rathore2.   

Abstract

The biosimilar industry is witnessing an unprecedented growth with the newer therapeutics increasing in complexity over time. A key step towards development of a biosimilar is to establish analytical comparability with the innovator product, which would otherwise affect the safety/efficacy profile of the product. Choosing appropriate analytical tools that can fulfil this objective by qualitatively and/or quantitatively assessing the critical quality attributes (CQAs) of the product is highly critical for establishing equivalence. These CQAs cover the primary and higher order structures of the product, product related variants and impurities, as well as process related impurities, and host cell related impurities. In the present work, we use such an analytical platform for assessing comparability of five approved Granulocyte Colony Stimulating Factor (GCSF) biosimilars (Emgrast, Lupifil, Colstim, Neukine and Grafeel) to the innovator product, Neupogen(®). The comparability studies involve assessing structural homogeneity, identity, secondary structure, and product related modifications. Physicochemical analytical tools include peptide mapping with mass determination, circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopy, reverse phase chromatography (RPC) and size exclusion chromatography (SEC) have been used in this exercise. Bioactivity assessment include comparison of relative potency through in vitro cell proliferation assays. The results from extensive analytical examination offer robust evidence of structural and biological similarity of the products under consideration with the pertinent innovator product. For the most part, the biosimilar drugs were found to be comparable to the innovator drug anomaly that was identified was that three of the biosimilars had a typical variant which was reported as an oxidized species in the literature. But, upon further investigation using RPC-FLD and ESI-MS we found that this is likely a conformational variant of the biotherapeutic been studied.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Analytical comparability; Biosimilars; GCSF; Granulocyte colony stimulating factor; Mass spectroscopy; Peptide mapping

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27289250     DOI: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2016.05.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci        ISSN: 1570-0232            Impact factor:   3.205


  6 in total

1.  Assessment of structural and functional similarity of biosimilar products: Rituximab as a case study.

Authors:  Neh Nupur; Nidhi Chhabra; Rozaleen Dash; Anurag S Rathore
Journal:  MAbs       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 5.857

2.  Determination of Critical Quality Attributes for a Biotherapeutic in the QbD Paradigm: GCSF as a Case Study.

Authors:  Sumit K Singh; Deepak Kumar; Anurag S Rathore
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 4.009

3.  Innovator Filgrastim versus Generic Filgrastim in Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Mobilization.

Authors:  Sadik Husian; Preethi Jeyaraman; S K Gupta; Reeta Rai; Sangeeta Pathak; Nitin Dayal; Rahul Naithani
Journal:  South Asian J Cancer       Date:  2021-09-04

Review 4.  Analytical Similarity Assessment of Biosimilars: Global Regulatory Landscape, Recent Studies and Major Advancements in Orthogonal Platforms.

Authors:  Neh Nupur; Srishti Joshi; Davy Gulliarme; Anurag S Rathore
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-02-09

5.  Development of an LC-MS/MS peptide mapping protocol for the NISTmAb.

Authors:  Trina Mouchahoir; John E Schiel
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2018-02-07       Impact factor: 4.142

6.  Quality Comparison of Biosimilar and Copy Filgrastim Products with the Innovator Product.

Authors:  Liem Andhyk Halim; Maripaz Márquez; Roel F Maas-Bakker; Gilberto Castañeda-Hernández; Wim Jiskoot; Huub Schellekens
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2018-10-02       Impact factor: 4.200

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.