Literature DB >> 27289137

Breast Density Reporting Laws and Supplemental Screening-A Survey of Referring Providers' Experiences and Understanding.

Santo Maimone1, Michelle D McDonough2, Stephanie L Hines3.   

Abstract

Dense breast parenchyma obscures breast lesions on mammography and is an independent risk factor for development of breast cancer. Many states have approved laws requiring patient notification of dense breast tissue. Supplemental screening modalities are available however their utilization and efficacy are quite variable. Our aim was to survey primary care providers in an effort to gauge awareness of and familiarity with dense breast legislation and supplemental screening. A multisite survey was administered via e-mail to all Mayo Clinic staff physicians, residents and fellows, as well as nurse practitioners and physician assistants in the departments of Internal Medicine, Family Medicine, and Obstetrics and Gynecology. 362 responses were collected. 68% of respondents were aware of breast density notification laws; 32% had no knowledge of these laws. Implementation of supplemental imaging was variable. Of eligible respondents, 26% offered a supplemental examination to every patient with dense breasts, 47% offered it only to certain patients based upon unique patient or risk factors, 15% did not offer supplemental examinations, and 11% offered an examination based on other criteria. When assessing comfort level in answering questions regarding breast density, 32% were "slightly comfortable" and 18% were "not comfortable." When estimating the percentage of patients with adequate insurance coverage for supplemental imaging, 62% were unsure while 11% did not inquire. Despite public and legislative support, there is a lack of familiarity and considerable practice variation among primary care providers when managing patients with mammographically dense breast tissue. Further research and advances in patient and provider education on this topic are needed to improve management. Radiologists can assist by educating referring providers and consolidating imaging strategies to help circumvent systems-based flaws.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27289137     DOI: 10.1067/j.cpradiol.2016.05.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Probl Diagn Radiol        ISSN: 0363-0188


  11 in total

1.  "You probably can't feel as safe as normal women": Hispanic women's reactions to breast density notification.

Authors:  Alsacia L Pacsi-Sepulveda; Rachel C Shelton; Carmen B Rodriguez; Arielle T Coq; Parisa Tehranifar
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2019-02-15       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Acceptability of an Interactive Computer-Animated Agent to Promote Patient-Provider Communication About Breast Density: a Mixed Method Pilot Study.

Authors:  Christine Gunn; Ariel Maschke; Timothy Bickmore; Mark Kennedy; Margaret F Hopkins; Michael D C Fishman; Michael K Paasche-Orlow; Erica T Warner
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2020-01-09       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Australian Women's Intentions and Psychological Outcomes Related to Breast Density Notification and Information: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Hankiz Dolan; Kirsten McCaffery; Nehmat Houssami; Erin Cvejic; Meagan Brennan; Jolyn Hersch; Melanie Dorrington; Angela Verde; Lisa Vaccaro; Brooke Nickel
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2022-06-01

4.  Breast Density Knowledge in a Screening Mammography Population Exposed to Density Notification.

Authors:  Rebecca E Smith; Brian Sprague; Louise M Henderson; Karla Kerlikowske; Diana L Miglioretti; Diana S M Buist; Karen J Wernli; Tracy Onega; Karen Schifferdecker; Gloria Jackson-Nefertiti; Dianne Johnson; Jill Budesky; Anna N A Tosteson
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2022-03-24       Impact factor: 6.240

5.  Between-Race Differences in Supplemental Breast Cancer Screening Before and After Breast Density Notification Law.

Authors:  Mark Manning; Terrance L Albrecht; Suzanne O'Neill; Kristen Purrington
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2018-10-17       Impact factor: 5.532

6.  Knowledge and Perception of Breast Density, Screening Mammography, and Supplemental Screening: in Search of "Informed".

Authors:  Karen E Schifferdecker; Anna N A Tosteson; Celia Kaplan; Karla Kerlikowske; Diana S M Buist; Louise M Henderson; Dianne Johnson; Jill Jaworski; Gloria Jackson-Nefertiti; Kelly Ehrlich; Mary W Marsh; Lisa Vu; Tracy Onega; Karen J Wernli
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  The Impact of Breast Density Information or Notification on Women's Cognitive, Psychological, and Behavioral Outcomes: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Brooke Nickel; Tessa Copp; Meagan Brennan; Rachel Farber; Kirsten McCaffery; Nehmat Houssami
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 13.506

8.  A tumor specific antibody to aid breast cancer screening in women with dense breast tissue.

Authors:  Lopamudra Das Roy; Lloye M Dillon; Ru Zhou; Laura J Moore; Chad Livasy; Joe M El-Khoury; Rahul Puri; Pinku Mukherjee
Journal:  Genes Cancer       Date:  2017-03

9.  Explaining Breast Density Recommendations: An Introductory Workshop for Breast Health Providers.

Authors:  Rachel S Casas; Ambili Ramachandran; Christine M Gunn; Janice M Weinberg; Kitt Shaffer
Journal:  MedEdPORTAL       Date:  2017-11-21

10.  Adding value in the era of COVID-19: Increasing usage of a patient-centered radiology consultation service.

Authors:  Melissa Reichman; Elizabeth Kagan Arleo; Robert J Min; Keith Hentel; Meghan Cahill; Tara Ruddy; Deirdre Sullivan; Michele Drotman
Journal:  Clin Imaging       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 1.605

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.