Literature DB >> 27288661

Basal serum tryptase is not a risk factor for immediate-type drug hypersensitivity during childhood.

Ozlem Cavkaytar1, Betul Karaatmaca1, Ebru Arik Yilmaz1, Umit M Sahiner1, Cansın Sackesen1,2, Bulent E Sekerel1, Ozge Soyer3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: High serum basal tryptase (sBT) levels have been identified as a risk factor for both venom- and food-induced severe allergic reactions. The aim of this study was to compare sBT levels in children with different severity of actual drug hypersensitivity reactions (DHRs) with those of age- and sex-matched controls without any history of DHRs.
METHOD: Patients between 0 and 18 years of age with a history of immediate-type DHRs manifested in 0-6 h after the culprit drug intake were included. Following ENDA (European Network for Drug Allergy) inquiries, patients were evaluated with skin and/or provocation tests to define the actual drug-hypersensitive patients. Serum BT levels were determined for both patients and controls.
RESULTS: Of 345 children, 106 patients (30.7%) [(58.5% male), median age (interquartile range) 8.0 years (4.2-12.2)] were diagnosed as drug hypersensitive. Ninety-eight controls were also included. The sBT levels of drug-hypersensitive patients with and without anaphylaxis and the control group were similar [2.6 (2.0-3.6) μg/l vs. 2.8 (1.6-4.3) μg/l vs. 2.6 (1.8-3.6) μg/l, respectively, (p > 0.05)]. The sBT levels of the patients with sole cutaneous symptoms 2.8 (1.6-4.3) μg/l, mild anaphylaxis 3.0 (1.9-4.9) μg/l, and moderate-to-severe anaphylaxis 2.6 (2.0-3.6) μg/l were also comparable (p > 0.05). The onset of DHRs [those occurring in 1 h (n = 87) or in 1-6 h (n = 19) after the drug intake], positive results with skin tests with the culprit drug, or the classification of the patients according to different age groups [(0-2 years), (2-6 years), (6-12 years), (12-18 years)] did not correlate with sBT levels.
CONCLUSION: The sBT levels in children with actual drug hypersensitivity would not be a risk factor for severe systemic reactions on the contrary to children with allergic reactions to food or insect venom.
© 2016 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anaphylaxis; drug hypersensitivity; pediatrics; tryptase

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27288661     DOI: 10.1111/pai.12604

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Allergy Immunol        ISSN: 0905-6157            Impact factor:   6.377


  4 in total

Review 1.  Pro and Contra: Provocation Tests in Drug Hypersensitivity.

Authors:  Ozge Soyer; Umit Murat Sahiner; Bulent Enis Sekerel
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2017-07-04       Impact factor: 5.923

2.  Evaluation of the left venticular systolic function with the measurement of global longitudinal strain by Speckle tracking echocardiography in anaphylaxis.

Authors:  Semra Demir; Adem Atici; Raif Coskun; Muge Olgac; Derya Unal; Remzi Sarikaya; Aslı Gelincik; Bahattin Colakoglu; Huseyin Oflaz; Mehmet Rasih Sonsoz; Suna Buyukozturk
Journal:  Asia Pac Allergy       Date:  2018-10-24

3.  Pediatric drug hypersensitivity: which diagnostic tests?

Authors:  Francesca Saretta; Francesca Mori; Fabio Cardinale; Lucia Liotti; Fabrizio Franceschini; Giuseppe Crisafulli; Silvia Caimmi; Paolo Bottau; Roberto Bernardini; Carlo Caffarelli
Journal:  Acta Biomed       Date:  2019-01-30

4.  What is new in anaphylaxis?

Authors:  Alberto Martelli; Rosario Ippolito; Martina Votto; Maria De Filippo; Ilaria Brambilla; Mauro Calvani; Fabio Cardinale; Elena Chiappini; Marzia Duse; Sara Manti; Gian Luigi Marseglia; Carlo Caffarelli; Claudio Cravidi; Michele Miraglia Del Giudice; Maria Angela Tosca
Journal:  Acta Biomed       Date:  2020-09-15
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.