Literature DB >> 27288188

Sex Differences in the Perceived Dominance and Prestige of Women With and Without Cosmetics.

Viktoria R Mileva1, Alex L Jones2, Richard Russell3, Anthony C Little4.   

Abstract

Women wearing cosmetics have been associated with a higher earning potential and higher status jobs. However, recent literature suggests that status can be accrued through two distinct routes: dominance and prestige. In two experiments, we applied a standardized amount of cosmetics to female faces using computer software. We then asked participants to rate faces with and without cosmetics for various traits including attractiveness, dominance, and prestige. Men and women both rated the faces with cosmetics added as higher in attractiveness. However, only women rated faces with cosmetics as higher in dominance, while only men rated them as higher in prestige. In a follow-up study, we investigated whether these enhanced perceptions of dominance from women were caused by jealousy. We found that women experience more jealousy toward women with cosmetics, and view these women as more attractive to men and more promiscuous. Our findings suggest that cosmetics may function as an extended phenotype and can alter other's perceptions differently depending on the perceiver's sex.
© The Author(s) 2016.

Entities:  

Keywords:  attractiveness; cosmetics; jealousy; sex differences; social status

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27288188     DOI: 10.1177/0301006616652053

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perception        ISSN: 0301-0066            Impact factor:   1.490


  9 in total

1.  Response to Commentaries: A Socioevolutionary Approach to Self-Presentation Modification.

Authors:  Adam C Davis; Steven Arnocky
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2021-10-28

2.  Self-cosmetic care during the COVID-19 pandemic and its psychological impacts: Facts behind the closed doors.

Authors:  Suchana Marahatta; Aditi Singh; Prajjwal Pyakurel
Journal:  J Cosmet Dermatol       Date:  2021-08-12       Impact factor: 2.189

Review 3.  An Evolutionary Perspective on Appearance Enhancement Behavior.

Authors:  Adam C Davis; Steven Arnocky
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2020-10-06

4.  Beautification Is More than Mere Mate Attraction: Extending Evolutionary Perspectives on Female Appearance Enhancement.

Authors:  Hannah K Bradshaw; Danielle J DelPriore
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2021-03-01

5.  Facial Cosmetics and Attractiveness: Comparing the Effect Sizes of Professionally-Applied Cosmetics and Identity.

Authors:  Alex L Jones; Robin S S Kramer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-10-11       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Examining the 'cosmetics placebo effect'.

Authors:  Carlota Batres; Sarah S Kramer; Caroline G DeAngelis; Richard Russell
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-01-10       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Sexual Selection and the Evolution of Human Appearance Enhancements.

Authors:  Barnaby J W Dixson
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2021-03-15

8.  Who's Behind the Makeup? The Effects of Varying Levels of Cosmetics Application on Perceptions of Facial Attractiveness, Competence, and Sociosexuality.

Authors:  Erick R Aguinaldo; Jessie J Peissig
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-06-17

9.  The contrasting effects of body image and self-esteem in the makeup usage.

Authors:  Anthonieta Looman Mafra; Caio S A Silva; Marco A C Varella; Jaroslava V Valentova
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-03-25       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.