Literature DB >> 27286554

An investigation of commonly prescribed stretches of the ankle plantarflexors in people with Multiple Sclerosis.

J Ofori1, J Freeman1, A Logan2, R Rapson3, J Zajieck4, J Hobart4, J Marsden5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Stretches are often prescribed to manage increased limb stiffness in people with Multiple Sclerosis. This study determined the ankle plantarflexor torque magnitude that people with Multiple Sclerosis can apply during four commonly prescribed stretches and determined the relationship between the applied torque and functional ability.
METHODS: People with Multiple Sclerosis (N=27) were compared to healthy control participants (n=15). Four stretches were investigated; stretching in step standing; using a step; pulling the ankle into dorsiflexion and standing in a frame. Joint position and forces were measured using 3D motion analysis and torque transducers. Baseline ankle strength and stiffness was measured using motor driven ankle perturbations.
FINDINGS: People with Multiple Sclerosis (N=27) had higher stretch reflex amplitudes and lower strength compared to the control group (n=15). People with Multiple Sclerosis achieved less lengthening of the plantarflexor muscle-tendon complex when stretching but similar ankle torques compared to controls. While stretching people with Multiple Sclerosis showed greater muscle activation in the ankle plantarflexors. Stretches in weight bearing positions produced higher plantarflexor torques. People with Multiple Sclerosis with lower functional ability preferred the more supported stretches (ankle pull and standing frame).
INTERPRETATION: Stretches in weight bearing positions achieve higher ankle torques but this is in part due to increased postural activity in people with Multiple Sclerosis. Functional ability may limit stretch effectiveness.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Multiple Sclerosis; Spasticity; Stiffness; Stretching

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27286554     DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2016.05.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)        ISSN: 0268-0033            Impact factor:   2.063


  3 in total

Review 1.  Assessment and Measurement of Spasticity in MS: State of the Evidence.

Authors:  Cinda L Hugos; Michelle H Cameron
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2019-08-30       Impact factor: 5.081

2.  Evaluation of the Multiple Sclerosis Spasticity Scale 88: A Short Report.

Authors:  Jenny Freeman; Terry Gorst; Jodielin Ofori; Jonathan Marsden
Journal:  Rehabil Process Outcome       Date:  2019-01-16

3.  MS Spasticity: Take Control (STC) for ambulatory adults: protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Cinda L Hugos; Michelle H Cameron
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2020-10-07       Impact factor: 2.474

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.