| Literature DB >> 27286272 |
Stefaan Van Damme1, Charlotte Vanden Bulcke2, Wouter Durnez2, Geert Crombez2.
Abstract
In a recent issue of Consciousness and Cognition, Filbrich, Torta, Vanderclausen, Azanon, and Legrain (2016) commented on a paper in which we used a tactile Temporal Order Judgment (TOJ) task to show that expecting pain on a specific body location biased attention to that location (Vanden Bulcke, Crombez, Durnez, & Van Damme, 2015). Their main criticism is that the effects are likely to reflect response bias rather than genuine attentional bias. We agree that the TOJ task used may be susceptible to response bias, and welcome the authors' methodological suggestions to control for such bias. However, we feel that certain aspects of our work are misrepresented in their paper. Most importantly, we contest their argument that our instructions made the threat location task-relevant, thereby increasing risk of response bias. Further, we reply to other methodological and theoretical issues raised by these authors.Entities:
Keywords: Attention; Bodily threat; Experimental pain; Temporal Order Judgment
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27286272 DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2016.05.012
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Conscious Cogn ISSN: 1053-8100