Literature DB >> 27285666

Back pain improvement after decompression without fusion or stabilization in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis and clinically significant preoperative back pain.

Charles H Crawford1,2, Steven D Glassman1,2, Praveen V Mummaneni3, John J Knightly4, Anthony L Asher5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE The relief of leg symptoms by surgical decompression for lumbar stenosis is well supported by the literature. Less is known about the effect on back pain. Some surgeons believe that the relief of back pain should not be an expected outcome of decompression and that substantial back pain may be a contraindication to decompression only; therefore, stabilization may be recommended for patients with substantial preoperative back pain even in the absence of well-accepted indications for stabilization such as spondylolisthesis, scoliosis, or sagittal malalignment. The purpose of this study is to determine if patients with lumbar stenosis and substantial back pain-in the absence of spondylolisthesis, scoliosis, or sagittal malalignment-can obtain significant improvement after decompression without fusion or stabilization. METHODS Analysis of the National Neurosurgery Quality and Outcomes Database (N2QOD) identified 726 patients with lumbar stenosis (without spondylolisthesis or scoliosis) and a baseline back pain score ≥ 5 of 10 who underwent surgical decompression only. No patient was reported to have significant spondylolisthesis, scoliosis, or sagittal malalignment. Standard demographic and surgical variables were collected, as well as patient outcomes including back and leg pain scores, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and EuroQoL 5D (EQ-5D) at baseline and 3 and 12 months postoperatively. RESULTS The mean age of the cohort was 65.6 years, and 407 (56%) patients were male. The mean body mass index was 30.2 kg/m2, and 40% of patients had 2-level decompression, 29% had 3-level decompression, 24% had 1-level decompression, and 6% had 4-level decompression. The mean estimated blood loss was 130 ml. The mean operative time was 100.85 minutes. The vast majority of discharges (88%) were routine home discharges. At 3 and 12 months postoperatively, there were significant improvements from baseline for back pain (7.62 to 3.19 to 3.66), leg pain (7.23 to 2.85 to 3.07), EQ-5D (0.55 to 0.76 to 0.75), and ODI (49.11 to 27.20 to 26.38). CONCLUSIONS Through the 1st postoperative year, patients with lumbar stenosis-without spondylolisthesis, scoliosis, or sagittal malalignment-and clinically significant back pain improved after decompression-only surgery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BP = back pain; EQ-5D = EuroQoL 5D; LP = leg pain; MCID = minimum clinically important difference; N2QOD = National Neurosurgery Quality and Outcomes Database; ODI = Oswestry disability index; back pain; decompression without fusion; lumbar spinal stenosis; outcomes; registry; surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27285666     DOI: 10.3171/2016.3.SPINE151468

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine        ISSN: 1547-5646


  6 in total

1.  Surgical versus nonsurgical treatment of lumbar degenerative kyphosis.

Authors:  Tae Sik Goh; Jong Ki Shin; Myung Soo Youn; Hong Seok Lee; Taek Hoon Kim; Jung Sub Lee
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-02-28       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Outcomes after decompression surgery without fusion for patients with lumbar spinal stenosis and substantial low back pain.

Authors:  Soichiro Masuda; Yusuke Kanba; Jun Kawai; Noboru Ikeda
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-08-31       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Total joint replacement improves pain, functional quality of life, and health utilities in patients with late-stage knee and hip osteoarthritis for up to 5 years.

Authors:  Audrey Neuprez; Arnaud Henri Neuprez; Jean-François Kaux; William Kurth; Christophe Daniel; Thierry Thirion; Jean-Pierre Huskin; Philippe Gillet; Olivier Bruyère; Jean-Yves Reginster
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2019-11-13       Impact factor: 2.980

4.  Epidemiological Relevance of Elevated Preoperative Patient Health Questionnaire-9 Scores on Clinical Improvement Following Lumbar Decompression.

Authors:  James M Parrish; Nathaniel W Jenkins; Elliot D K Cha; Conor P Lynch; Cara E Geoghegan; Caroline N Jadczak; Shruthi Mohan; Kern Singh
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2022-02

5.  Surgery for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis in Patients With Mild Leg Pain Levels Is Associated With Unsatisfactory Outcome.

Authors:  Freyr Gauti Sigmundsson; Anders Möller; Fredrik Strömqvist
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2020-08-04

6.  Navigated minimally invasive unilateral laminotomy with crossover for intraoperative prediction of outcome in degenerative lumbar stenosis.

Authors:  Salvatore Massimiliano Cardali; Fabio Cacciola; Giovanni Raffa; Alfredo Conti; Maria Caffo; Antonino Germanò
Journal:  J Craniovertebr Junction Spine       Date:  2018 Apr-Jun
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.