Literature DB >> 27285586

Approaches to Develop Alternative Testing Strategies to Inform Human Health Risk Assessment of Nanomaterials.

Vicki Stone1, Helinor J Johnston1, Dominique Balharry1,2, Jeremy M Gernand3, Mary Gulumian4,5.   

Abstract

The development of alternative testing strategies (ATS) for hazard assessment of new and emerging materials is high on the agenda of scientists, funders, and regulators. The relatively large number of nanomaterials on the market and under development means that an increasing emphasis will be placed on the use of reliable, predictive ATS when assessing their safety. We have provided recommendations as to how ATS development for assessment of nanomaterial hazard may be accelerated. Predefined search terms were used to identify the quantity and distribution of peer-reviewed publications for nanomaterial hazard assessment following inhalation, ingestion, or dermal absorption. A summary of knowledge gaps relating to nanomaterial hazard is provided to identify future research priorities and areas in which a rich data set might exist to allow ATS identification. Consultation with stakeholders (e.g., academia, industry, regulators) was critical to ensure that current expert opinion was reflected. The gap analysis revealed an abundance of studies that assessed the local and systemic impacts of inhaled particles, and so ATS are available for immediate use. Development of ATS for assessment of the dermal toxicity of chemicals is already relatively advanced, and these models should be applied to nanomaterials as relatively few studies have assessed the dermal toxicity of nanomaterials to date. Limited studies have investigated the local and systemic impacts of ingested nanomaterials. If the recommendations for research prioritization proposed are adopted, it is envisioned that a comprehensive battery of ATS can be developed to support the risk assessment process for nanomaterials. Some alternative models are available for immediate implementation, while others require more developmental work to become widely adopted. Case studies are included that can be used to inform the selection of alternative models and end points when assessing the pathogenicity of fibers and mode of action of nanomaterial toxicity.
© 2016 Society for Risk Analysis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3Rs; Alternative testing strategy; gap analysis; hazard, nanomaterials; risk

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27285586     DOI: 10.1111/risa.12645

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Risk Anal        ISSN: 0272-4332            Impact factor:   4.000


  6 in total

Review 1.  Characterizing risk assessments for the development of occupational exposure limits for engineered nanomaterials.

Authors:  P A Schulte; E D Kuempel; N M Drew
Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2018-03-21       Impact factor: 3.271

2.  Impact of copper oxide nanomaterials on differentiated and undifferentiated Caco-2 intestinal epithelial cells; assessment of cytotoxicity, barrier integrity, cytokine production and nanomaterial penetration.

Authors:  Victor C Ude; David M Brown; Luca Viale; Nilesh Kanase; Vicki Stone; Helinor J Johnston
Journal:  Part Fibre Toxicol       Date:  2017-08-23       Impact factor: 9.400

Review 3.  Nano-Inclusions Applied in Cement-Matrix Composites: A Review.

Authors:  Guillermo Bastos; Faustino Patiño-Barbeito; Faustino Patiño-Cambeiro; Julia Armesto
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2016-12-16       Impact factor: 3.623

4.  Human 3D Cultures as Models for Evaluating Magnetic Nanoparticle CNS Cytotoxicity after Short- and Repeated Long-Term Exposure.

Authors:  Uliana De Simone; Marianna Roccio; Laura Gribaldo; Arsenio Spinillo; Francesca Caloni; Teresa Coccini
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2018-07-08       Impact factor: 5.923

5.  Risk assessment on-a-chip: a cell-based microfluidic device for immunotoxicity screening.

Authors:  Arianna Oddo; Mariana Morozesk; Enzo Lombi; Tobias Benedikt Schmidt; Ziqiu Tong; Nicolas Hans Voelcker
Journal:  Nanoscale Adv       Date:  2020-12-18

6.  Copper oxide nanoparticle toxicity profiling using untargeted metabolomics.

Authors:  Matthew S P Boyles; Christina Ranninger; Roland Reischl; Marc Rurik; Richard Tessadri; Oliver Kohlbacher; Albert Duschl; Christian G Huber
Journal:  Part Fibre Toxicol       Date:  2016-09-08       Impact factor: 9.400

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.