| Literature DB >> 27285149 |
Nobuyuki Taniguchi1, Ryuuichi Takano2, Kouichi Itoh1, Syukuko Kaneko1, Akira Onoguchi1, Yi Wang1, Tomoyuki Kuwata3, Kouichiro Shigeta1, Tomoko Ono1.
Abstract
Application of the velocity profile method is recommended for reliable measurement of flow volume in larger vessels, and ultrasonic flowmetry is a useful clinical tool for this purpose. We used the velocity profile in conjunction with a minor modification in the conventional velocity profile method and examined the reproducibility of flowmetry from color Doppler data. Data of three examiners were allowed to analyze intraobserver reproducibility and interobserver agreement in the common carotid artery, and we measured flow volume in the peripheral vessels of healthy individuals. Estimated flow volumes in five healthy examinees were 350 to 550 ml/min and did not vary significantly between examiners. Interobserver correlation was good (r 1=0.63), but intraobserver correlations in two sonographers were excellent (r 1=0.85) in by one who was experienced in this method and poor (r 1=0.32) in the other. Good interobserver agreement and intraobserver reproducibility of experienced examiners suggests that this method is reliable. Values obtained with normal controls averaged 438±78 (mean±SD) ml/min and 449±64 ml/min, respectively, in the right and left carotid arteries (n=12) and 120±31 ml/min and 83±23 ml/min, respectively, in the right and left vertebral arteries (n=10). Normal values were 542±71 ml/min (n=11) in the right renal artery, 1210±211 ml/min in the abdominal artery (n=10), and 799±182 ml/min in the main portal vein (n=17). Arterial blood flow volume can measure reliably by the velocity profile color Doppler method.Keywords: carotid artery; flowmetry; reproducibility; ultrasound; velocity profile
Year: 2003 PMID: 27285149 DOI: 10.1007/BF02485164
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Med Ultrason (2001) ISSN: 1346-4523 Impact factor: 1.314