Literature DB >> 2728500

Evaluation of three methods for determining initial vancomycin doses.

B H Ackerman1.   

Abstract

Dosing methods proposed by Matzke et al., Moellering et al., and Lake and Peterson were used to predict initial doses of vancomycin for serum concentration simulation using a two-compartment open model. Previously reported pharmacokinetic data from 25 of 28 patients were used to simulate steady-state serum vancomycin concentrations for doses derived from the three methods. The Matzke method failed to provide simulated one-hour postinfusion levels less than 30 micrograms/mL in 48 percent and troughs greater than 5 micrograms/mL in more than 88 percent of the patients. The Moellering method succeeded in achieving this goal in 96 percent of the simulated one-hour levels, and in 72 percent of the troughs when a six-hour dosing interval was selected. For the 8 mg/kg Lake-Peterson doses, one-hour levels greater than 30 micrograms/mL occurred in 28 percent of the simulations, and for the 10 mg/kg doses this increased to 40 percent. The 8 mg/kg doses resulted in trough simulations less than 5 micrograms/mL in 28 percent and the 10 mg/kg reduced this to only 20 percent. These simulations indicated that the Moellering nomogram with the six-hour dosing interval was the most successful method for initial dose selection, but early serum concentration monitoring and adjustment of initial empirical and nomogram-derived doses is necessary to assure safe and effective vancomycin serum concentrations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2728500     DOI: 10.1177/106002808902300203

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  DICP        ISSN: 1042-9611


  3 in total

Review 1.  An updated comparison of drug dosing methods. Part IV: Vancomycin.

Authors:  R D Pryka; K A Rodvold; S M Erdman
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 6.447

2.  Analysis of vancomycin time-kill studies with Staphylococcus species by using a curve stripping program to describe the relationship between concentration and pharmacodynamic response.

Authors:  B H Ackerman; A M Vannier; E B Eudy
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 3.  Teicoplanin in perspective. A critical comparison with vancomycin.

Authors:  R Janknegt
Journal:  Pharm Weekbl Sci       Date:  1991-08-23
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.