Literature DB >> 27284799

Transition from paternalism to shared decision making - a review of the educational environment in Bosnia and Herzegovina and Croatia.

Marta Vučemilović1, Mersiha Mahmić-Kaknjo2, Ivančica Pavličević3.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: In this article we will review the benefits of a system built on partnership of physicians and their patients, highlight some of the factors which impede this transition, and propose ways to address these factors. Also, we are going to analyze the educational environment in Bosnia and Herzegovina and Croatia concerning ethics and communication skills. Personal responsibility of patients for their health should be reflected in their joint involvement in health decisions with their physicians. Patients, insecure about their individual competence surrounding their health decisions, tend to shy away from responsibility, whereas physicians, pressured by the responsibilities of the profession, do not always show sensitivity to all of the patient's concerns. They often treat illnesses instead of patients. A more open and collaborative relationship between the patient and the physician through shared decision making would be a better alternative. In the end, the patient ultimately decides whether a health intervention was satisfactory in fulfilling his or her specific needs. Transition from a paternalistic to a mutual relationship between doctors and patients has already begun. In an era of intense information sharing, shared decision making is a sensitive, ethical, legal, and political concept which needs empathic doctors with well-developed communication skills to integrate their clinical knowledge with patient-centered care.
CONCLUSION: Transition from paternalistic to partner relation between physicians and patients is moving slowly ahead in Croatia and Bosnia and Herzegovina. Educational environment is improving but needs intense efforts to develop further.
Copyright © 2016 by Academy of Sciences and Arts of Bosnia and Herzegovina.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Communication skills; Ethics; Medical schools; Shared decision making

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27284799     DOI: 10.5644/ama2006-124.157

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Med Acad        ISSN: 1840-1848


  4 in total

1.  The strange case of Mr. H. Starting dialysis at 90 years of age: clinical choices impact on ethical decisions.

Authors:  Giorgina Barbara Piccoli; Andreea Corina Sofronie; Jean-Philippe Coindre
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 2.652

2.  Communication patterns in the doctor-patient relationship: evaluating determinants associated with low paternalism in Mexico.

Authors:  Eduardo Lazcano-Ponce; Angelica Angeles-Llerenas; Rocío Rodríguez-Valentín; Luis Salvador-Carulla; Rosalinda Domínguez-Esponda; Claudia Iveth Astudillo-García; Eduardo Madrigal-de León; Gregorio Katz
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2020-12-10       Impact factor: 2.652

3.  Reporting violations of European Charter of Patients' Rights: analysis of patient complaints in Croatia.

Authors:  Jasna Karačić; Marin Viđak; Ana Marušić
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2021-11-08       Impact factor: 2.834

4.  Cancer treatment decision-making among parents of paediatric oncology patients in Guatemala: a mixed-methods study.

Authors:  Dylan E Graetz; Silvia Rivas; Huiqi Wang; Yuvanesh Vedaraju; Gia Ferrara; Lucia Fuentes; Ana Cáceres-Serrano; Federico Antillon-Klussmann; Meenakshi Devidas; Monika Metzger; Carlos Rodriguez-Galindo; Jennifer W Mack
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-08-11       Impact factor: 3.006

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.