| Literature DB >> 27284569 |
Hye Jin Hwang1, Michelle Steidemann2, Taylor K Dunivin3, Mike Rizzo4, John J LaPres1.
Abstract
2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) is the most widely studied ligand of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR). The AHR-dependent TCDD-induced mitochondrial hyperpolarization (Tappenden et al., 2011) [1] and reduced oxygen consumption rate of intact mouse hepatoma cells (Huang et al., in press) [2] in the previous studies suggest that these alterations can be related to enzymatic activities of the electron transport chain (ETC) and ATP synthase in oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) system. Here, we evaluated the activity of each complex in the OXPHOS system using in vitro enzymatic assays. The calculated enzymatic activity of each complex was normalized against the activity of citrate synthase. To combine each value from an independent experiment, normalized enzyme activities from cells exposed to TCDD were converted to fold changes via comparison to the activity relative to time-matched vehicle control. The averaged fold change for each treatment suggests more replicates are needed in order to clearly evaluate a difference between treatments.Entities:
Keywords: AHR; Aryl hydrocarbon receptor; Electron transport chain; Mitochondria; TCDD
Year: 2016 PMID: 27284569 PMCID: PMC4887554 DOI: 10.1016/j.dib.2016.05.018
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Data Brief ISSN: 2352-3409
Fig. 1Activities of ETC complexes and ATP synthase.The activities of the ETC complexes and ATP synthase were measured with isolated mitochondria from hepa1c1c7 and c12 cells exposed to 30 nM TCDD or vehicle control (DMSO 0.01%) for 6 and 24 h. The activity of each complex (A. Complex I, B. Complex II, C. Complex II+III, D. Complex III, E. Complex IV, and F. Complex V) was normalized against the activity of citrate synthase. The fold change was calculated by re-normalization of enzyme activity from cells exposed to TCDD with the activity relative to time-matched vehicle control. The bars represent mean±the standard errors (n=4).
| Subject area | |
| More specific subject area | |
| Type of data | |
| How data was acquired | |
| Data format | |
| Experimental factors | |
| Experimental features | |
| Data source location | |
| Data accessibility |