| Literature DB >> 27284457 |
Antonis S Billis1, Asterios Batziakas1, Charalampos Bratsas2, Marianna S Tsatali1, Maria Karagianni1, Panagiotis D Bamidis1.
Abstract
Smart monitoring of seniors behavioural patterns and more specifically activities of daily living have attracted immense research interest in recent years. Development of smart decision support systems to support the promotion of health smart homes has also emerged taking advantage of the plethora of smart, inexpensive and unobtrusive monitoring sensors, devices and software tools. To this end, a smart monitoring system has been used in order to extract meaningful information about television (TV) usage patterns and subsequently associate them with clinical findings of experts. The smart TV operating state remote monitoring system was installed in four elderly women homes and gathered data for more than 11 months. Results suggest that TV daily usage (time the TV is turned on) can predict mental health change. Conclusively, the authors suggest that collection of smart device usage patterns could strengthen the inference capabilities of existing health DSSs applied in uncontrolled settings such as real senior homes.Entities:
Keywords: TV usage patterns; behavioural patterns; daily living activities; decision support systems; geriatrics; health smart homes; home computing; inexpensive monitoring sensors; medical expert systems; mental health change; patient monitoring; remote monitoring system; smart decision support systems; smart monitoring sensors; smart monitoring system; software tools; ubiquitous computing; unobtrusive monitoring sensors
Year: 2016 PMID: 27284457 PMCID: PMC4898025 DOI: 10.1049/htl.2015.0056
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Healthc Technol Lett ISSN: 2053-3713
Fig. 1Smart TV monitoring system setup top: laptop running Java monitoring app 24/7 plus connections; bottom: Philips smart TV
TV usage data and relevant health information for each participant
| Subject | TV usage (number of days) | Mean time of usage ± standard deviation | Coefficient of variation, % | Memory problems | Depressive symptomatology | Number of PHQ/other test assessments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 263 | 202 ± 151.4 | 74.7 | yes | yes | 6/4 |
| B | 275 | 389 ± 303.9 | 77.9 | no | no | 5/3 |
| C | 281 | 156 ± 142.2 | 91 | yes | yes | 5/3 |
| D | 78 | 432 ± 322.2 | 74.4 | yes | no | 3/2 |
Fig. 2Distribution of the values of TV usage per subject via kernel density estimate
Estimates, errors and fit statistics for mixed effects models
| Response variable | Effect | Estimate | Std. error | Pr > | BIC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PHQ1 | intercept | 0.36197 | 0.36336 | >0.05 | 56.9 |
| TV usage time | 0.00115 | 0.00115 | 0.01a | ||
| PHQ2 | intercept | 0.64390 | 0.35945 | >0.05 | 48.0 |
| TV usage time | 0.00304 | 0.001 | 0.01a | ||
| PHQ3 | intercept | 0.064754 | 0.58324 | >0.05 | 46.1 |
| TV usage time | 0.003349 | 0.000868 | 0.003a | ||
| PHQ sum | intercept | 2.841025 | 1.9582 | >0.05 | 104.7 |
| TV usage time | 0.015087 | 0.004439 | 0.01a |
BIC: Bayes information criterion score.
aStatistical significance as p < 0.05.