Literature DB >> 27284071

Drosophila females trade off good nutrition with high-quality oviposition sites when choosing foods.

Mathieu Lihoreau1, Laure-Anne Poissonnier1, Guillaume Isabel1, Audrey Dussutour2.   

Abstract

Animals, from insects to humans, select foods to regulate their acquisition of key nutrients in amounts and balances that maximise fitness. In species in which the nutrition of juveniles depends on parents, adults must make challenging foraging decisions that simultaneously address their own nutrient needs as well as those of their progeny. Here, we examined how the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster, a species in which individuals eat and lay eggs in decaying fruits, integrate feeding decisions (individual nutrition) and oviposition decisions (offspring nutrition) when foraging. Using cafeteria assays with artificial diets varying in concentrations and ratios of protein to carbohydrates, we show that D. melanogaster females exhibit complex foraging patterns, alternating between laying eggs on high carbohydrate foods and feeding on foods with different nutrient contents depending on their own nutritional state. Although larvae showed faster development on high protein foods, both survival and learning performance were higher on balanced foods. We suggest that the apparent mismatch between the oviposition preference of females for high carbohydrate foods and the high performances of larvae on balanced foods reflects a natural situation where high carbohydrate ripened fruits gradually enrich in proteinaceous yeast as they start rotting, thereby yielding optimal nutrition for the developing larvae. Our findings that animals with rudimentary parental care uncouple feeding and egg-laying decisions in order to balance their own diet and provide a nutritionally optimal environment to their progeny reveal unsuspected levels of complexity in the nutritional ecology of parent-offspring interactions.
© 2016. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Drosophila melanogaster; Egg-laying; Feeding; Foraging behaviour; Fruit fly; Nutritional geometry

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27284071     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.142257

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  13 in total

1.  Physiological responses of insects to microbial fermentation products: Insights from the interactions between Drosophila and acetic acid.

Authors:  Geonho Kim; Jia Hsin Huang; John G McMullen; Peter D Newell; Angela E Douglas
Journal:  J Insect Physiol       Date:  2017-05-15       Impact factor: 2.354

2.  Adaptation to new nutritional environments: larval performance, foraging decisions, and adult oviposition choices in Drosophila suzukii.

Authors:  Nuno F Silva-Soares; A Nogueira-Alves; P Beldade; Christen Kerry Mirth
Journal:  BMC Ecol       Date:  2017-06-07       Impact factor: 2.964

3.  Nutritional geometry and fitness consequences in Drosophila suzukii, the Spotted-Wing Drosophila.

Authors:  Yvonne Young; Natasha Buckiewicz; Tristan A F Long
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2018-02-11       Impact factor: 2.912

4.  Sensory deficiencies affect resource selection and associational effects at two spatial scales.

Authors:  Thomas A Verschut; Brian D Inouye; Peter A Hambäck
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2018-10-03       Impact factor: 2.912

5.  Navigating infection risk during oviposition and cannibalistic foraging in a holometabolous insect.

Authors:  Jonathon A Siva-Jothy; Katy M Monteith; Pedro F Vale
Journal:  Behav Ecol       Date:  2018-08-09       Impact factor: 2.671

6.  A clinal polymorphism in the insulin signaling transcription factor foxo contributes to life-history adaptation in Drosophila.

Authors:  Esra Durmaz; Subhash Rajpurohit; Nicolas Betancourt; Daniel K Fabian; Martin Kapun; Paul Schmidt; Thomas Flatt
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2019-05-29       Impact factor: 4.171

7.  Sex-specific transcriptomic responses to changes in the nutritional environment.

Authors:  M Florencia Camus; Matthew Dw Piper; Max Reuter
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-08-22       Impact factor: 8.140

8.  Sex-Dependent Effects of the Microbiome on Foraging and Locomotion in Drosophila suzukii.

Authors:  Runhang Shu; Daniel A Hahn; Edouard Jurkevitch; Oscar E Liburd; Boaz Yuval; Adam Chun-Nin Wong
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2021-05-10       Impact factor: 5.640

9.  A Drosophila female pheromone elicits species-specific long-range attraction via an olfactory channel with dual specificity for sex and food.

Authors:  Sebastien Lebreton; Felipe Borrero-Echeverry; Francisco Gonzalez; Marit Solum; Erika A Wallin; Erik Hedenström; Bill S Hansson; Anna-Lena Gustavsson; Marie Bengtsson; Göran Birgersson; William B Walker; Hany K M Dweck; Paul G Becher; Peter Witzgall
Journal:  BMC Biol       Date:  2017-09-29       Impact factor: 7.431

10.  Olfactory Neurons and Brain Centers Directing Oviposition Decisions in Drosophila.

Authors:  Sonia G Chin; Sarah E Maguire; Paavo Huoviala; Gregory S X E Jefferis; Christopher J Potter
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2018-08-07       Impact factor: 9.423

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.