Literature DB >> 27283944

The development of a classification system for maternity models of care.

Natasha Donnolley1, Kerryn Butler-Henderson2, Michael Chapman3, Elizabeth Sullivan4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A lack of standard terminology or means to identify and define models of maternity care in Australia has prevented accurate evaluations of outcomes for mothers and babies in different models of maternity care.
OBJECTIVE: As part of the Commonwealth-funded National Maternity Data Development Project, a classification system was developed utilising a data set specification that defines characteristics of models of maternity care.
METHOD: The Maternity Care Classification System or MaCCS was developed using a participatory action research design that built upon the published and grey literature.
RESULTS: The study identified the characteristics that differentiate models of care and classifies models into eleven different Major Model Categories.
CONCLUSION: The MaCCS will enable individual health services, local health districts (networks), jurisdictional and national health authorities to make better informed decisions for planning, policy development and delivery of maternity services in Australia.
© The Author(s) 2016.

Keywords:  classification; data collection; health care evaluation mechanisms; health information systems; patient care bundles; perinatal care

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27283944     DOI: 10.1177/1833358316639454

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Inf Manag        ISSN: 1833-3583            Impact factor:   3.185


  9 in total

1.  An interactive decision-making framework (i-DMF) to scale up maternity continuity of carer models.

Authors:  Jocelyn Toohill; Yogesh Chadha; Shelley Nowlan
Journal:  J Res Nurs       Date:  2020-01-17

2.  A direct comparison of patient-reported outcomes and experiences in alternative models of maternity care in Queensland, Australia.

Authors:  Yvette D Miller; Jessica Tone; Sutapa Talukdar; Elizabeth Martin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-07-12       Impact factor: 3.752

3.  Effect of Midwives' Application of Intelligent Delivery Room Management System on Delivery Outcome.

Authors:  Xia Li; Ping Zhang; Yong Zhang; Gaiying Cui; Hui Du
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2022-05-27       Impact factor: 2.809

Review 4.  Cost-effectiveness of continuity of midwifery care for women with complex pregnancy: a structured review of the literature.

Authors:  Roslyn E Donnellan-Fernandez; Debra K Creedy; Emily J Callander
Journal:  Health Econ Rev       Date:  2018-12-05

5.  Standardizing the categorizations of models of aftercare for survivors of childhood cancer.

Authors:  Devonne Ryan; Paul C Moorehead; Roger Chafe
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2019-11-20       Impact factor: 2.655

6.  Midwife-centred management: a qualitative study of midwifery group practice management and leadership in Australia.

Authors:  Leonie Hewitt; Ann Dadich; Donna L Hartz; Hannah G Dahlen
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-09-26       Impact factor: 2.908

Review 7.  A review of the impact of financing mechanisms on maternal health care in Australia.

Authors:  Haylee Fox; Stephanie M Topp; Emily Callander; Daniel Lindsay
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 3.295

8.  Maternal and perinatal outcomes by planned place of birth in Australia 2000 - 2012: a linked population data study.

Authors:  Caroline S E Homer; Seong L Cheah; Chris Rossiter; Hannah G Dahlen; David Ellwood; Maralyn J Foureur; Della A Forster; Helen L McLachlan; Jeremy J N Oats; David Sibbritt; Charlene Thornton; Vanessa L Scarf
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-10-29       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  General practitioner obstetricians' models of care in rural Western Australia.

Authors:  Maryam Wazir; Carly Roxburgh; Sarah Moore
Journal:  Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  2022-01-22       Impact factor: 1.884

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.