Literature DB >> 27283216

Advanced Reconstruction of Vesicourethral Support (ARVUS) during Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: One-year Functional Outcomes in a Two-group Randomised Controlled Trial.

Vladimir Student2, Ales Vidlar1, Michal Grepl1, Igor Hartmann1, Eva Buresova1, Vladimir Student2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The advent of robotics has facilitated new surgical techniques for radical prostatectomy. These allow adjustment of pelvic anatomical and functional relationships after removal of the prostate to ameliorate postprostatectomy incontinence (PPI) and reduce the time to complete continence.
OBJECTIVES: To describe the results of a new surgical technique for reconstruction of vesicourethral anastomosis using the levator ani muscle for support during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A prospective, randomised, single-blind study among 66 consecutive patients with localised prostate cancer (cT1-2N0M0) undergoing RARP from June to September 2014, 32 using the new technique and 34 using the standard posterior reconstruction according to Rocco. SURGICAL PROCEDURE: In the advanced reconstruction of vesicourethral support (ARVUS) intervention group, the fibres of the levator ani muscle, Denonvilliers fascia, retrotrigonal layer, and median dorsal raphe were used to form the dorsal support for the urethrovesical anastomosis. Suture of the arcus tendineus to the bladder neck served as the anterior fixation. MEASUREMENTS: We compared demographic data and preoperative and postoperative functional and oncologic results for the two groups. The primary endpoint was continence evaluated at different time points (24h, 2, 4, and 8 wk, and 6 and 12 mo). The secondary endpoints were perioperative and postoperative complications and erectile function. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Using a continence definition of 0 pads/d, the continence rates for the ARVUS versus the control group were 21.9% versus 5.9% at 24h (p=0.079), 43.8% versus 11.8% at 2 wk (p=0.005), 62.5% versus 14.7% at 4 wk (p<0.001), 68.8% versus 20.6% at 8 wk (p<0.001), 75.0% versus 44.1% at 6 mo (p=0.013), and 86.66% versus 61.29% at 12 mo (p=0.04). International Index of Erectile Function questionnaire results at 6 and 12 mo after surgery showed similar potency rates for the control group (40.0% and 73.33%) and the ARVUS group (38.8% and 72.22%). There were four postoperative complications (2 in each group): three haematomas requiring transfusion and one lymphocele that needed drainage. No urinary retention, anastomosis leak, or perineal pain was observed. Limitations include the small sample size and the single-institution design.
CONCLUSIONS: The ARVUS technique yielded better urinary continence results than standard posterior reconstruction, with no negative impact on erectile function, complication rate, or oncologic outcome. External validation is warranted before clear recommendations can be made. PATIENT
SUMMARY: We showed that postprostatectomy incontinence can be assuaged using a new technique for vesicourethral anastomosis reconstruction during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). This could significantly improve the quality of life of patients after RARP. More studies are needed to support our results.
Copyright © 2016 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anastomosis; Continence; Erectile function; Functional reconstruction; Prostate cancer; Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27283216     DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.05.032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  15 in total

1.  The suspension sutures during minimally invasive radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Theodoros Tokas; Udo Nagele
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2017-08-17       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 2.  Impact of Pelvic Anatomical Changes Caused by Radical Prostatectomy.

Authors:  Yoshifumi Kadono; Takahiro Nohara; Shohei Kawaguchi; Hiroaki Iwamoto; Hiroshi Yaegashi; Kazuyoshi Shigehara; Kouji Izumi; Atsushi Mizokami
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-21       Impact factor: 6.575

Review 3.  Considering the role of radical prostatectomy in 21st century prostate cancer care.

Authors:  Anthony J Costello
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2020-02-21       Impact factor: 14.432

4.  Recommendations on robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: a Brazilian experts' consensus.

Authors:  Eliney Ferreira Faria; Carlos Vaz Melo Maciel; André Berger; Anuar Mitre; Breno Dauster; Celso Heitor Freitas; Clovis Fraga; Daher Chade; Marcos Dall'Oglio; Francisco Carvalho; Franz Campos; Gustavo Franco Carvalhal; Gustavo Caserta Lemos; Gustavo Guimarães; Hamilton Zampolli; Joao Ricardo Alves; Joao Pádua Manzano; Marco Antônio Fortes; Marcos Flavio Holanda Rocha; Mauricio Rubinstein; Murilo Luz; Pedro Romanelli; Rafael Coelho; Raphael Rocha; Roberto Dias Machado; Rodolfo Borges Dos Reis; Stenio Zequi; Romulo Guida; Valdair Muglia; Marcos Tobias-Machado
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2021-01-11

Review 5.  Surgical Techniques to Optimize Early Urinary Continence Recovery Post Robot Assisted Radical Prostatectomy for Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Ashwin N Sridhar; Mohammed Abozaid; Prabhakar Rajan; Prasanna Sooriakumaran; Greg Shaw; Senthil Nathan; John D Kelly; Tim P Briggs
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 6.  Anatomical robotic prostatectomy: technical factors to achieve superb continence and erectile function.

Authors:  Zach S Dovey; Ash K Tewari
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2020-04

Review 7.  Preservation of continence in radical prostatectomy patients: a laparoscopic surgeon's perspective.

Authors:  Piotr Kania; Piotr Wośkowiak; Maciej Salagierski
Journal:  Cent European J Urol       Date:  2019-01-17

8.  Prospective evaluation of vesicourethral anastomosis outcomes in robotic radical prostatectomy during early experience in a university hospital.

Authors:  Lucas Medeiros Burttet; Gabrielle Aguiar Varaschin; Andre Kives Berger; Leandro Totti Cavazzola; Milton Berger; Brasil Silva
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2017 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.541

9.  The efficacy and feasibility of total reconstruction versus nontotal reconstruction of the pelvic floor on short-term and long-term urinary continence rates after radical prostatectomy: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yu-Peng Wu; Ning Xu; Shi-Tao Wang; Shao-Hao Chen; Yun-Zhi Lin; Xiao-Dong Li; Qing-Shui Zheng; Yong Wei; Xue-Yi Xue
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 2.754

10.  Radical prostatectomy performed via robotic, transperitoneal and extraperitoneoscopic approaches: functional and early oncological outcomes.

Authors:  Leonid Rapoport; Ofer Yossepowitch; Evgeniy Shpot; Denis Chinenov; Yaroslav Chernov; Maria Yurova; Dmitry Enikeev
Journal:  Cent European J Urol       Date:  2018-10-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.