Literature DB >> 27283215

Perspectives of Prostate Cancer Patients on Gleason Scores and the New Grade Groups: Initial Qualitative Study.

Stacy Loeb1, Caitlin Curnyn2, Erica Sedlander2.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh：

Substances：

Year:  2016        PMID： 27283215      PMCID： PMC5554069          DOI： 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.05.039

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN： 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


× No keyword cloud information.
  5 in total

1.  Classification of prostatic carcinomas.

Authors:  D F Gleason
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Rep       Date:  1966-03

2.  Future-proofing Gleason Grading: What to Call Gleason 6 Prostate Cancer?

Authors:  Stacy Loeb; Francesco Montorsi; James W Catto
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2015-03-11       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 3.  The 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma: Definition of Grading Patterns and Proposal for a New Grading System.

Authors:  Jonathan I Epstein; Lars Egevad; Mahul B Amin; Brett Delahunt; John R Srigley; Peter A Humphrey
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 6.394

4.  Prognostic Gleason grade grouping: data based on the modified Gleason scoring system.

Authors:  Phillip M Pierorazio; Patrick C Walsh; Alan W Partin; Jonathan I Epstein
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2013-03-06       Impact factor: 5.588

5.  A Contemporary Prostate Cancer Grading System: A Validated Alternative to the Gleason Score.

Authors:  Jonathan I Epstein; Michael J Zelefsky; Daniel D Sjoberg; Joel B Nelson; Lars Egevad; Cristina Magi-Galluzzi; Andrew J Vickers; Anil V Parwani; Victor E Reuter; Samson W Fine; James A Eastham; Peter Wiklund; Misop Han; Chandana A Reddy; Jay P Ciezki; Tommy Nyberg; Eric A Klein
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2015-07-10       Impact factor: 20.096
  5 in total
  5 in total

1.  Active Surveillance of Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Peter L Choyke; Stacy Loeb
Journal:  Oncology (Williston Park)       Date:  2017-01-15       Impact factor: 2.990

2.  Prognostic value of the new Grade Groups in Prostate Cancer: a multi-institutional European validation study.

Authors:  R Mathieu; M Moschini; B Beyer; K M Gust; T Seisen; A Briganti; P Karakiewicz; C Seitz; L Salomon; A de la Taille; M Rouprêt; M Graefen; S F Shariat
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2017-01-10       Impact factor: 5.554

3.  Informational needs during active surveillance for prostate cancer: A qualitative study.

Authors:  Stacy Loeb; Caitlin Curnyn; Angela Fagerlin; R Scott Braithwaite; Mark D Schwartz; Herbert Lepor; H Ballentine Carter; Shannon Ciprut; Erica Sedlander
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2017-09-01

4.  Prognostic implications of 2005 Gleason grade modification. Population-based study of biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Frederik B Thomsen; Yasin Folkvaljon; Klaus Brasso; Stacy Loeb; David Robinson; Lars Egevad; Pär Stattin
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 3.454

5.  It's all in the name: Does nomenclature for indolent prostate cancer impact management and anxiety?

Authors:  Matthew T Hudnall; Anuj S Desai; Kyle P Tsai; Adam B Weiner; Amanda X Vo; Oliver S Ko; Stephen Jan; Edward M Schaeffer; Shilajit D Kundu
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2021-06-03       Impact factor: 6.921
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.