Literature DB >> 27283107

Optimal Timing of Urinary Catheter Removal After Thoracic Operations: A Randomized Controlled Study.

Mark S Allen1, Shanda H Blackmon2, Francis C Nichols2, Stephen D Cassivi2, William S Harmsen3, Bettie Lechtenberg2, Karlyn Pierson2, Dennis A Wigle2, K Robert Shen2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There are very few randomized trials confirming the belief that prolonged urinary catheterization increases urinary tract infections, and none of these have included a comparative analysis of patients with an epidural catheter in place. The aim of this prospective randomized trial was to determine if removal of the urinary catheter within 48 hours after a thoracic operation, as required by the Surgical Care Improvement Project (SCIP) Measure 9, leads to increases in urinary tract reintervention and lower rates of urinary tract infections.
METHODS: From February 2012 to August 2014, patients undergoing a general thoracic surgical procedure in whom an epidural catheter was placed for analgesia were eligible for inclusion in the trial. Patients were randomized to urinary catheter removal within 48 hours of the operation completion or 6 hours after epidural catheter removal.
RESULTS: The study enrolled 374 patients, 217 men (58%) and 157 women (42%). The 247 eligible and evaluated patients, 141 (57.1%) men and 106 (42.9%) women, were a median age of 61.5 years (range, 21 to 87 years). There were no statistically significant differences in any of the preoperative or operative categories between the two groups. Median length of stay was 5 days (range, 2 to 42 days) for all patients, and there was no difference between the two groups. Postoperatively, 19 patients (7.7%) required urinary catheter reinsertion after it was removed. A significantly greater number of patients in the early removal group required reinsertion of the urinary catheter (15 [12.4%] vs 4 [3.2%]); p = 0.0065). Patients whose urinary catheter was removed within 48 hours of the operation had a much higher rate of bladder scans postoperatively (59.5% [n = 72]) and required more in-and-out catheterization than those whose urinary catheter was removed 6 hours after the epidural analgesia was discontinued (31.0% [n = 39]; p < 0.0001). The only documented urinary tract infection in the entire cohort occurred in a patient whose urinary catheter was removed within 48 hours after the operation. No urinary tract infections developed in the 126 patients whose urinary catheter remained in place until the epidural catheter was removed.
CONCLUSIONS: In a randomized control trial, patients with an epidural catheter in place after a general thoracic surgical operation have a higher rate of urinary problems when the urinary catheter is removed early, while the epidural catheter is still in place, compared with patients whose urinary catheter is removed after the epidural analgesia is discontinued.
Copyright © 2016 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27283107     DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.03.115

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  6 in total

Review 1.  Guidelines for Perioperative Care in Esophagectomy: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society Recommendations.

Authors:  Donald E Low; William Allum; Giovanni De Manzoni; Lorenzo Ferri; Arul Immanuel; MadhanKumar Kuppusamy; Simon Law; Mats Lindblad; Nick Maynard; Joseph Neal; C S Pramesh; Mike Scott; B Mark Smithers; Valérie Addor; Olle Ljungqvist
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Recommendations from the Italian intersociety consensus on Perioperative Anesthesa Care in Thoracic surgery (PACTS) part 2: intraoperative and postoperative care.

Authors:  Federico Piccioni; Andrea Droghetti; Alessandro Bertani; Cecilia Coccia; Antonio Corcione; Angelo Guido Corsico; Roberto Crisci; Carlo Curcio; Carlo Del Naja; Paolo Feltracco; Diego Fontana; Alessandro Gonfiotti; Camillo Lopez; Domenico Massullo; Mario Nosotti; Riccardo Ragazzi; Marco Rispoli; Stefano Romagnoli; Raffaele Scala; Luigia Scudeller; Marco Taurchini; Silvia Tognella; Marzia Umari; Franco Valenza; Flavia Petrini
Journal:  Perioper Med (Lond)       Date:  2020-10-23

3.  Risk of Urinary Recatheterization for Thoracic Surgical Patients with Epidural Anesthesia.

Authors:  Luis E De León; Namrata Patil; Philip M Hartigan; Abby White; Carlos E Bravo-Iñiguez; Sam Fox; Jeffrey Tarascio; Scott J Swanson; Raphael Bueno; Michael T Jaklitsch
Journal:  J Surg Res (Houst)       Date:  2020-06-22

4.  Impact of pregabalin on early phase post-thoracotomy pain compared with epidural analgesia.

Authors:  Noriyuki Matsutani; Hitoshi Dejima; Takashi Nakayama; Yusuke Takahashi; Hirofumi Uehara; Hisae Iinuma; Toshiya Harashima; Kazuki Anraku; Masafumi Kawamura
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 2.895

5.  Subpleural multilevel intercostal continuous analgesia after thoracoscopic pulmonary resection: a pilot study.

Authors:  Jelle E Bousema; Esther M Dias; Sander M Hagen; Bastiaan Govaert; Patrick Meijer; Frank J C van den Broek
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2019-10-22       Impact factor: 1.637

6.  Strategies for the removal of short-term indwelling urethral catheters in adults.

Authors:  Awaiss Ellahi; Fiona Stewart; Emily A Kidd; Rhonda Griffiths; Ritin Fernandez; Muhammad Imran Omar
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-06-29
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.