Literature DB >> 27282911

Morphological, ultrastructural and functional imaging of frozen/thawed and vitrified/warmed human ovarian tissue retrieved from oncological patients.

R Fabbri1, R Vicenti1, M Macciocca2, N A Martino3, M E Dell'Aquila4, G Pasquinelli5, A M Morselli-Labate1, R Seracchioli1, R Paradisi1.   

Abstract

STUDY QUESTION: Which is the best method for human ovarian tissue cryopreservation: slow freezing/rapid thawing (SF/RT) or vitrification/warming (V/W)? SUMMARY ANSWER: The conventional SF/RT protocol used in this study seems to better preserve the morpho-functional status of human cryopreserved ovarian tissue than the used open carrier V/W protocol. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Cryopreservation of human ovarian tissue is generally performed using the SF/RT method. However, reduction in the follicular pool and stroma damage are often observed. An emerging alternative procedure is represented by V/W which seems to allow the maintenance of the morphological integrity of the stroma. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This is a retrospective cohort study including six patients affected by oncological diseases and enrolled from January to December 2014. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING,
METHODS: Ovarian tissue was laparoscopically harvested from the right and left ovaries and was cryopreserved using a routinary SF/RT protocol or a V/W method, involving tissue incubation in two solutions (containing propylene glycol, ethylene glycol and sucrose at different concentrations) and vitrification in an open system. For each patient, three pieces from each ovary were collected at the time of laparoscopy (fresh tissue) and after storage (SF/RT or V/W) and processed for light microscopy (LM) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM), to assess the morphological and ultrastructural features of follicles and stroma, and for laser scanning confocal microscopy (LSCM), to determine the functional energetic/redox stroma status. The preservation status of SF/RT and V/W ovarian tissues was compared with that of fresh ones, as well as between them. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: By LM and TEM, SF/RT and V/W samples showed cryodamage of small entity. Interstitial oedema and increased stromal cell vacuolization and chromatin clumping were observed in SF/RT samples; in contrast, V/W samples showed oocyte nuclei with slightly thickened chromatin and irregular shapes. The functional imaging analysis by LSCM revealed that the mitochondrial activity and intracellular reactive oxygen species levels were reduced both in SF/RT and in V/W samples compared with fresh samples. The study also showed progressive dysfunction of the mitochondrial activity going from the outer to the inner serial section of the ovarian cortex. The reduction of mitochondrial activity of V/W samples compared with fresh samples was significantly higher in the inner section than in the outer section. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: The results report the bioenergetic and oxidative status assessment of fresh and cryopreserved human ovarian tissue by LSCM, a technique recently applied to tissue samples. The use of LSCM on human ovarian tissues after SF/RT or V/W is a new application that requires validation. The procedures for mitochondrial staining with functional probes and fixing are not yet standardized. Xenografting of the cryopreserved ovarian tissue in severe combined immunodeficient mice and in vitro culture have not yet been performed. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE
FINDINGS: The identification of a cryopreservation method able to maintain the morpho-functional integrity of the ovarian tissue and a number of follicles comparable with those observed in fresh tissue might optimize results in clinical practice, in terms of recovery, duration of ovarian function and increased delivery outcomes after replanting. The SF/RT protocol allowed better morpho-functional tissue integrity than the V/W procedure. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: Funding was provided by Fondazione del Monte di Bologna e Ravenna, Italy. Dr N.A.M. was granted by the project ONEV MIUR PONa3 00134-n.254/R&C 18 5 2011 and the project GR-2011-02351396 (Ministry of Health, Young Researchers Grant 2011/2012). There are no competing interests. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Clinical trial 74/2001/0 (approved:13 2 2002): 'Pilot study on cryopreservation of human ovarian tissue: morphological and immunohistochemical analysis before and after cryopreservation'.
© The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  human ovarian tissue cryopreservation; laser scanning confocal microscopy; light microscopy; slow freezing; transmission electron microscopy; vitrification

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27282911     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dew134

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  13 in total

1.  Comparison between slow freezing and vitrification of ovarian tissue cryopreservation in assigned female at birth transgender people receiving testosterone therapy: data on histological and viability parameters.

Authors:  Aina Borrás; Dolors Manau; Francesc Fabregues; Sara Peralta; Josep Maria Calafell; Gemma Casals; Adela Saco; Inés Agustí; Francisco Carmona
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2022-01-31       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Detailed Morphological Analysis of Cryoinjury in Human Ovarian Tissue Following Vitrification or Slow Freezing.

Authors:  L Ramos; S Galbinski; A Nacul; M F Jiménez; N Frantz; A Bos-Mikich
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2021-08-16       Impact factor: 2.924

3.  Oocyte Biobanks: Old Assumptions and New Challenges.

Authors:  Pamela Tozzo
Journal:  BioTech (Basel)       Date:  2021-02-18

4.  Ovarian tissue cryopreservation and novel bioengineering approaches for fertility preservation.

Authors:  Andrea S K Jones; Ariella Shikanov
Journal:  Curr Breast Cancer Rep       Date:  2020-11-04

5.  Comparison between two cryopreservation techniques of human ovarian cortex: morphological aspects and the heat shock response (HSR).

Authors:  Sérgio Galbinski; Lucas Stahlhöfer Kowalewski; Gisele Bettú Grigolo; Larissa Ramos da Silva; Mirela Foresti Jiménez; Mauricio Krause; Nilo Frantz; Adriana Bös-Mikich
Journal:  Cell Stress Chaperones       Date:  2022-01-18       Impact factor: 3.827

6.  Long-term storage does not impact the quality of cryopreserved human ovarian tissue.

Authors:  Raffaella Fabbri; Maria Macciocca; Rossella Vicenti; Gianandrea Pasquinelli; Giacomo Caprara; Sabrina Valente; Renato Seracchioli; Roberto Paradisi
Journal:  J Ovarian Res       Date:  2016-08-24       Impact factor: 4.234

7.  Vitrification versus slow freezing for human ovarian tissue cryopreservation: a systematic review and meta-anlaysis.

Authors:  Qingquan Shi; Yidong Xie; Yan Wang; Shangwei Li
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-17       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  In vitro Activation Prior to Transplantation of Human Ovarian Tissue: Is It Truly Effective?

Authors:  Marie-Madeleine Dolmans; Florence Cordier; Christiani A Amorim; Jacques Donnez; Catherine Vander Linden
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2019-08-02       Impact factor: 5.555

9.  Slow Freezing Versus Vitrification of Mouse Ovaries: from Ex Vivo Analyses to Successful Pregnancies after Auto-Transplantation.

Authors:  Carmen Terren; Maïté Fransolet; Marie Ancion; Michelle Nisolle; Carine Munaut
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-12-23       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 10.  Methods of Ovarian Tissue Cryopreservation: Is Vitrification Superior to Slow Freezing?-Ovarian Tissue Freezing Methods.

Authors:  Marisa Kometas; Gregory M Christman; Joseph Kramer; Alice Rhoton-Vlasak
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2021-05-03       Impact factor: 3.060

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.