OBJECTIVE: : We aimed to evaluate the presence of venous stenosis and blood flow abnormalities in the neck vessels of patients with multiple sclerosis (MS), in respect to a group of age- and sex-matched healthy controls (HC), and their possible relations with clinical variables using a semi-automated quantitative MRI method. METHODS: : 45 patients with relapsing remitting MS and 40 HC were enrolled in this study. Flow rates and cross-sectional areas of arterial and venous neck vessels were assessed by phase-contrast MRI at two different neck levels (C2-C3 and C6-C7), and differences between groups were evaluated with an unpaired t-test. Correlation between blood flow variables and clinical parameters was analyzed with Spearman's test. RESULTS: : A significant internal jugular vein (IJV) stenosis was found in 23/45 (51.1%) patients with MS and 18/40 (45.0%) HC. No differences were observed between patients with MS and HC for any of the flow measures obtained. No correlations were found between MRI measures and any of the tested clinical variables. CONCLUSION: : No differences in the IJV area emerged at quantitative MRI evaluation, suggesting that stenosis of the extracranial veins is unrelated to MS. Furthermore, no flow differences in the neck vessels were found between patients with MS and HC in any of the tested flow measures, with no correlation with clinical variables. Our results confirm that the hypothesis of the presence of extracranial venous abnormalities in MS, both in terms of stenosis or flow measures, is not suitable. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE:: Neck venous drainage abnormalities have been claimed to be associated with MS. Conversely, our quantitative MRI analysis seems to exclude that extracranial venous alterations are related to the disease.
OBJECTIVE: : We aimed to evaluate the presence of venous stenosis and blood flow abnormalities in the neck vessels of patients with multiple sclerosis (MS), in respect to a group of age- and sex-matched healthy controls (HC), and their possible relations with clinical variables using a semi-automated quantitative MRI method. METHODS: : 45 patients with relapsing remitting MS and 40 HC were enrolled in this study. Flow rates and cross-sectional areas of arterial and venous neck vessels were assessed by phase-contrast MRI at two different neck levels (C2-C3 and C6-C7), and differences between groups were evaluated with an unpaired t-test. Correlation between blood flow variables and clinical parameters was analyzed with Spearman's test. RESULTS: : A significant internal jugular vein (IJV) stenosis was found in 23/45 (51.1%) patients with MS and 18/40 (45.0%) HC. No differences were observed between patients with MS and HC for any of the flow measures obtained. No correlations were found between MRI measures and any of the tested clinical variables. CONCLUSION: : No differences in the IJV area emerged at quantitative MRI evaluation, suggesting that stenosis of the extracranial veins is unrelated to MS. Furthermore, no flow differences in the neck vessels were found between patients with MS and HC in any of the tested flow measures, with no correlation with clinical variables. Our results confirm that the hypothesis of the presence of extracranial venous abnormalities in MS, both in terms of stenosis or flow measures, is not suitable. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE:: Neck venous drainage abnormalities have been claimed to be associated with MS. Conversely, our quantitative MRI analysis seems to exclude that extracranial venous alterations are related to the disease.
Authors: Peter Sundström; Anders Wåhlin; Khalid Ambarki; Richard Birgander; Anders Eklund; Jan Malm Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2010-08 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: M Blinkenberg; P Akeson; H Sillesen; S Lövgaard; F Sellebjerg; O B Paulson; H R Siebner; P S Sørensen Journal: Acta Neurol Scand Date: 2012-04-25 Impact factor: 3.209
Authors: Anthony L Traboulsee; Katherine B Knox; Lindsay Machan; Yinshan Zhao; Irene Yee; Alexander Rauscher; Darren Klass; Peter Szkup; Robert Otani; David Kopriva; Shanti Lala; David K Li; Dessa Sadovnick Journal: Lancet Date: 2013-10-09 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: F E Diehn; K M Schwartz; C H Hunt; L J Eckel; N G Campeau; R E Carter; J B Allred; D F Kallmes Journal: Clin Neuroradiol Date: 2013-07-02 Impact factor: 3.649
Authors: Andrew D Barreto; Staley A Brod; Thanh-Tung Bui; James R Jemelka; Larry A Kramer; Kelly Ton; Alan M Cohen; John W Lindsey; Flavia Nelson; Ponnada A Narayana; Jerry S Wolinsky Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2013-02-26 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: P Zamboni; R Galeotti; E Menegatti; A M Malagoni; G Tacconi; S Dall'Ara; I Bartolomei; F Salvi Journal: J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry Date: 2008-12-05 Impact factor: 10.154
Authors: W I McDonald; A Compston; G Edan; D Goodkin; H P Hartung; F D Lublin; H F McFarland; D W Paty; C H Polman; S C Reingold; M Sandberg-Wollheim; W Sibley; A Thompson; S van den Noort; B Y Weinshenker; J S Wolinsky Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2001-07 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: G Pontillo; S Cocozza; R Lanzillo; C Russo; M D Stasi; C Paolella; E A Vola; C Criscuolo; P Borrelli; G Palma; E Tedeschi; V B Morra; A Elefante; A Brunetti Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2018-12-20 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: L Pelizzari; D Jakimovski; M M Laganà; N Bergsland; J Hagemeier; G Baselli; B Weinstock-Guttman; R Zivadinov Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2018-07-26 Impact factor: 3.825