Literature DB >> 27282733

Accuracy of sagittal oblique view in preoperative indirect magnetic resonance arthrography for diagnosis of tears involving the upper third of the subscapularis tendon.

Ho Young Ryu1, Seung Yeop Song1, Jae Chul Yoo2, Ji Young Yun3, Young Chul Yoon3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to investigate the accuracy of sagittal oblique view (SOV) magnetic resonance imaging grading for tears involving the upper third of the subscapularis tendons in correlation with arthroscopic findings. We also propose a schematic classification in the SOV for upper-third subscapularis tears.
METHODS: The study analyzed 364 patients with an average age of 56.0 years. All patients underwent indirect magnetic resonance arthrography (MRA) before surgery. A slightly different magnetic resonance grading was introduced with SOV by musculoskeletal radiologists (Y.C.Y. and J.Y.Y.) and an orthopedic shoulder surgeon (H.Y.R.) who had no information about the clinical data. Subscapularis tendon tear classifications were all prospectively analyzed. Magnetic resonance grading was compared with the arthroscopic findings.
RESULTS: The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of subscapularis tendon tear detection were 0.72, 0.77, and 0.75, respectively, for the radiologists. For the orthopedic surgeon, the corresponding values were 0.73, 0.83, and 0.79, respectively. The κ coefficients for interobserver agreement comparing magnetic resonance grade of the musculoskeletal radiologists with the arthroscopic grading showed fair values (κ value, 0.301). Interobserver agreement between the magnetic resonance grade of the orthopedic surgeon and arthroscopic grades was fair (κ value, 0.377). Interobserver agreement between the musculoskeletal radiologists and the orthopedic surgeon was moderate (κ value, 0.591).
CONCLUSIONS: The accuracy of SOV indirect MRA for detecting tears was 0.75 to 0.79. Although the correlation between magnetic resonance and arthroscopic grading was only fair, for most of the magnetic resonancegrading on SOV, the first facet view showed similar results compared with arthroscopy. The accuracy of determining whether subscapularis repair is indicated was 0.82 to 0.83 with SOV indirect MRA.
Copyright © 2016 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MRA; MRI; Subscapularis; first facet; leading edge tear; sagittal oblique view

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27282733     DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2016.02.038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg        ISSN: 1058-2746            Impact factor:   3.019


  9 in total

1.  Orthopedic resident's learning curve for arthroscopic subscapularis tendon repair: short-term clinical and radiographic outcomes.

Authors:  E Visonà; S Vio; G Franceschi; A Maron; K Corona; S Cerciello; G Merolla; A Berizzi; R Aldegheri
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2017-07-29

2.  A novel diagnostic method to predict subscapularis tendon tear with sagittal oblique view magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Jae Woo Shim; Chae Hyun Pang; Seul Ki Min; Jeung Yeol Jeong; Jae Chul Yoo
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-10-13       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Coracohumeral index and coracoglenoid inclination as predictors for different types of degenerative subscapularis tendon tears.

Authors:  Hao Zhang; Qiang Zhang; Zhong-Li Li
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-08-29       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  [Development of a risk stratification model for subscapularis tendon tear based on patient-specific data from 528 shoulder arthroscopy].

Authors:  Wennan Xu; Yaonan Zhang; Lei Shi; Fei Wang; Qingyun Xue
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2022-06-15

5.  The Digitation Sign Facilitates Diagnosis of Shoulder Subscapularis Lesions on Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Authors:  Ana Nigues; Yves Salentiny; Marko Nabergoj; Alexandre Lädermann; Lionel Neyton
Journal:  Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil       Date:  2022-02-11

6.  Hidden Long Head of the Biceps Tendon Instability and Concealed Intratendinous Subscapularis Tears.

Authors:  Sang Hoon Chae; Tae Wan Jung; Sang Hyeon Lee; Myo Jong Kim; Seung Min Park; Jeung Yeol Jung; Jae Chul Yoo
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2020-01-31

7.  The AAOS 2019 Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Rotator Cuff Injuries Are Unbiased and Incorporate a Diverse Body of Literature.

Authors:  Jason Lee; Daniel W Griepp; Colin J Burgess; Brandon Petrone; Adam D Bitterman; Randy M Cohn
Journal:  Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil       Date:  2022-03-01

8.  Development and Validation of a Web-Based Dynamic Nomogram to Improve the Diagnostic Performance of Subscapularis Tendon Tear.

Authors:  Wennan Xu; Zitian Zheng; Qingyun Xue
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-05-31

9.  Evaluation of subscapularis tendon tears of the anterosuperior aspect using radial-sequence magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Ryosuke Matsushita; Shin Yokoya; Hiroshi Negi; Norimasa Matsubara; Yuji Akiyama; Nobuo Adachi
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2021-09-28
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.