| Literature DB >> 27282371 |
Agata Zemleduch-Barylska1, Gabriela Lorenc-Plucińska2.
Abstract
The tannery industry is a major source of anthropogenic chromium (Cr) contamination due to the large amounts of solid waste produced and its problematic management. The unique composition of tannery waste, usually high concentrations of Cr and other metals as well as organic matter and nutrients, makes it a great risk for soil and water environment but also a possible effective fertilizer for non-food plants that can tolerate metals. The goal of this study was to understand the adaptation mechanism of Salix viminalis to growth on Cr-rich tannery waste from an active landfill. We used a proteomic approach to identify leaf and fine roots proteins altered by tannery waste as compared to control soil conditions. We found no obvious symptoms of oxidative stress in leaves or fine roots. Proteomic results indicated some changes in metabolism, with increases in energy production processes and their greater efficiency for leaves rather than root development. Comparison between S. viminalis and P. × canescens response to tannery waste suggested that S. viminalis is not suitable for remediation of Cr-contaminated areas of a tannery waste landfill site.Entities:
Keywords: Chromium; Leaves; Phytoremediation; Proteomic analysis; Roots; Salix viminalis; Solid tannery waste
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27282371 PMCID: PMC5026714 DOI: 10.1007/s11356-016-7026-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Environ Sci Pollut Res Int ISSN: 0944-1344 Impact factor: 4.223
Malondialdehyde (MDA) concentration (μmol g−1 FW) and antioxidative enzymes—superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), ascorbate peroxidase (APX), guaiacol peroxidase (GPOD), dehydroascorbate reductase (DHAR), monodehydroascorbate reductase (MDHAR), and glutathione reductase (GR) activity (for SOD U mg−1 protein, for the rest nkat mg−1 protein)—in leaves and fine roots of S. viminalis planted on control soil and fresh tannery waste. Results represent means ± standard error; p values—significance of differences between control soil and tannery waste; ns indicates p > 0.05
| Organ | Variant | MDA | SOD | CAT | APX | GPOD | DHAR | MDAR | GR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Leaves | Control soil | 0.049 ± 0.004 | 749 ± 16 | 51.17 ± 1.5 | 3.5 ± 0.17 | 18.18 ± 0.15 | 0.35 ± 0.03 | 0.235 ± 0.008 | 0.317 ± 0.017 |
| Tannery waste | 0.054 ± 0.001 | 479 ± 18 | 16.83 ± 1.17 | 4.83 ± 0.17 | 26.25 ± 0.1 | 1.083 ± 0.033 | 0.28 ± 0.006 | 0.143 ± 0.012 | |
| p | ns | <0.00001 | <0.00001 | 0.003 | <0.00001 | <0.00001 | 0.001 | 0.0045 | |
| Fine roots | Control soil | 0.018 ± 0.001 | 3750 ± 50 | 4 ± 0.17 | |||||
| Tannery waste | 0.0198 ± 0.001 | 1315 ± 12 | 2.55 ± 0.13 | ||||||
| p | ns | <0.00001 | 0.001 |
Fig. 1Concentration of reduced (GSH) and oxidized glutathione (GSSG) (nM g−1 FW) and GSSG/GSH ratio in leaves (a) and roots (b) of S. viminalis planted on control soil and on tannery waste. Results represent means ± standard error. Values marked with asterisk are significantly different from controls (p > 0.05)
Proteins identified by MS/MS analysis in the leaves of Salix viminalis grown on control soil or on tannery waste. Change ↑ or ↓ indicates overabundant or less abundant proteins, respectively, after the growth on tannery waste (p < 0.05). tw means a protein spot was present in tannery waste growth variant only. Fold = fold change (ratio). % prot seq cover = % of protein sequence covered by the matched peptides. Main KEGG class abbreviations: M metabolism, GIP genetic information processing. Main GO class abbreviations: BP biological process, MF molecular function, CC cellular component
| Spot nb | Changea | Folda | Accession nbb | Nameb | Scoreb | Nb of peptides machedb | % prot seq coverb | pI exp/theora,b | Mass [kDa] exp/theora,b | BLASTc | KEGG classificationd | GO classificatione |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ↓ | 2.26 | gi|224095228 | Predicted protein [ | 845 | 14 | 31 | 6.59/6.59 | 51.1/50 | cysteine desulfurase/transaminase [ | M: *metabolism of cofactors and vitamins; thiamine metabolism | BP: *[2Fe-2S] cluster assembly |
|
| tw | – | gi|224058573 | Predicted protein [ | 255 | 4 | 21 | 5.15/5.64 | 27.1/25.04 | Osmotin precursor, putative [ | – | BP: *defense response to bacterium and incompatible interaction and defense response to fungus and response to other organism and response to salt stress |
|
| tw | – | gi|15220397 | Lactoylglutathione lyase, putative/glyoxalase I, putative [ | 422 | 9 | 18 | 5.7/6.97 | 33.76/39.43 | M: *carbohydrate metabolism; pyruvate metabolism | BP: *response to cold | |
|
| ↑ | 2.82 | gi|224072248 | Predicted protein [ | 1987 | 37 | 41 | 5.19/5.1 | 83.18/73.7 | Luminal binding protein [ | GIP: *folding, sorting, and degradation; protein export and protein processing in endoplasmic reticulum | MF: *ATP binding |
|
| tw | – | gi|224146286 | Predicted protein [ | 287 | 5 | 10 | 5.2/4.8 | 21.67/18.4 | Nuclear transport factor 2 (NTF2) family protein [ | – | BP: *protein import into nucleus and transport |
|
| ↑ | 3.21 | gi|118489670 | Unknown [ | 3471 | 27 | 66 | 5.52/5.4 | 30.17/24 | Inorganic pyrophosphatase [ | M: *energy metabolism; oxidative phosphorylation | BP: *phosphate-containing compound metabolic process |
|
| ↑ | 2.00 | gi|224109060 | Predicted protein [ | 1085 | 12 | 32 | 5.87/8.25 | 45.47/50.3 | Phosphoglycerate kinase [ | M: *carbohydrate metabolism; glycolysis/gluconeogenesis | BP: *glycolytic process |
|
| ↑ | 2.11 | gi|224060560 | Predicted protein [ | 1747 | 33 | 35 | 5.93/6.7 | 64.14/63 | d-3-Phosphoglycerate dehydrogenase, putative [ | M: *amino acid metabolism; Glycine, serine, and threonine metabolism | BP: *L-serine biosynthetic process |
|
| ↑ | 2.00 | gi|12585330 | RecName: Full = Phosphoglucomutase, cytoplasmic; Short = PGM; AltName: Full = Glucose phosphomutase | 932 | 12 | 25 | 5.62/5.49 | 73.4/63.37 | M: *carbohydrate metabolism; glycolysis/gluconeogenesis and pentose phosphate pathway and galactose metabolism and starch and sucrose metabolism and amino sugar and nucleotide sugar metabolism *Nucleotide Metabolism; purine metabolism | BP: *glucose metabolic process | |
|
| ↑ | 2.76 | gi|224113035 | Predicted protein [ | 661 | 17 | 27 | 5.78/5.84 | 63.74/56.7 | Phosphoglucosamine mutase family protein [ | M: carbohydrate metabolism; amino sugar and nucleotide sugar metabolism | – |
aData obtained during comparison of protein profiles in IMP 6.0
bData obtained during identification of proteins in the Mascot database (http://www.matrixscience.com)
cIdentification of unknown or predicted proteins according to the NCBI BlastP database (http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi)
dClassification from the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) database (http://www.genome.jp/kegg/)
eGene ontology (GO) classification from the UniProt database (http://www.uniprot.org/ )
Proteins identified by MS/MS analysis in the fine roots of Salix viminalis grown on a control soil or on tannery waste. Change ↑ or ↓ indicates overabundant or less abundant proteins, respectively, after the growth on tannery waste (p < 0.05). tw or cs means a protein spot was present in tannery waste or control soil, respectively, growth variant only. Fold = fold change (ratio). % prot seq cover = % of protein sequence covered by the matched peptides. Main KEGG class abbreviations: M metabolism, GIP genetic information processing, CP cellular processes, EIP environmental information processing. Main GO class abbreviations: BP biological process, MF molecular function, CC cellular component
| Spot nb | Changea | Folda | Accesion nbb | Nameb | Scoreb | Nb of peptides machedb | % prot seq coverb | pI exp / theora,b | mass [kDa] exp / theora,b | BLASTc | KEGG Classificationd | GO Classificatione |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| cs | - | gi|118484162 | unknown [Populus trichocarpa] | 1373 | 24 | 39 % | 5.6 / 8.50 | 29.73 / 27.70 | Probable ATP synthase 24 kDa subunit, mitochondrial [Arabidopsis thaliana] |
| - |
|
| cs | - | gi|224114988 | predicted protein [Populus trichocarpa] | 200 | 3 | 14 % | 5.8 / 5.88 | 29.91 / 28.30 | stem-specific protein tsjt1, putative [Jatropha curcas] | - |
|
|
| cs | - | gi|225449497 | PREDICTED: similar to HSC70-1 (heat shock cognate 70 kDa protein 1); ATP binding isoform 1 [Vitis vinifera] | 236 | 5 | 12 % | 6.37 / 5.17 | 64.1 / 71.5 |
|
| |
|
| ↓ | 2.10 | gi|224053010 | predicted protein [Populus trichocarpa] | 2186 | 23 | 35 % | 5.7 / 9.20 | 43.73 / 41.6 | enoyl-[acyl-carrier-protein] reductase [Populus trichocarpa] |
| - |
|
| cs | - | gi|224093330 | predicted protein [Populus trichocarpa] | 122 | 3 | 14 % | 4.75 / 4.91 | 21.57 / 20.6 | Kunitz-type protease inhibitor KPI-F9 [Populus trichocarpa x Populus deltoides] | - |
|
|
| ↓ | 2.28 | gi|118484484 | unknown [Populus trichocarpa] | 1308 | 3 | 18 % | 5.32 / 5.79 | 20.27 / 17.5 | type II peroxiredoxin [Populus trichocarpa] | - |
|
|
| cs | - | gi|118487795 | unknown [Populus trichocarpa] | 269 | 8 | 20 % | 5.76 / 6.3 | 41.9 / 35.9 | annexin, putative [Ricinus communis] | - |
|
|
| cs | - | gi|2501578 | Probable pyridoxal biosynthesis protein PDX1; AltName: Ethylene-inducible protein HEVER | 182 | 4 | 16 % | 6.29 / 6.26 | 40.79 / 33.39 |
|
| |
|
| cs | - | gi|224131686 | vitamin-b12 independent methionine synthase, 5-methyltetrahydropteroyltriglutamate-homocysteine [Populus trichocarpa] | 666 | 16 | 20 % | 6.59 / 6.26 | 95.9 / 84.9 |
| - | |
|
| cs | - | gi|224131618 | predicted protein [Populus trichocarpa] | 420 | 3 | 12 % | 5.17 / 5.24 | 28.81 / 26.25 | carboxymethylenebutenolidase, putative [Ricinus communis] | - |
|
|
| cs | - | gi|224101413 | predicted protein [Populus trichocarpa] | 1226 | 8 | 45 % | 5.57 / 5.60 | 20.84 / 17.60 | eIF5A1 [Populus deltoides] |
|
|
|
| ↓ | 2.28 | gi|224076645 | predicted protein [Populus trichocarpa] | 1524 | 7 | 25 % | 5.81 / 6.08 | 25.54 / 21.6 | Minor allergen Alt a, putative [Ricinus communis] ~ Flavoprotein wrbA, putative [Ricinus communis] ~ quinone reductase-like [Vitis vinifera] | - |
|
|
| ↓ | 2.25 | gi|224093760 | predicted protein [Populus trichocarpa] | 404 | 6 | 18 % | 6.5 / 6.34 | 38.88 / 36.3 | Anx1 [Gossypium hirsutum] | - |
|
|
| ↓ | 3.03 | gi|224118628 | predicted protein [Populus trichocarpa] | 560 | 8 | 32 % | 5.87 / 5.37 | 26.76 / 25.8 | proteasome subunit beta type 6,9, putative [Ricinus communis] |
|
|
|
| ↓ | 3.42 | gi|283135906 | DHAR class glutathione transferase DHAR2 [Populus trichocarpa] | 1952 | 15 | 45 % | 5.7 / 5.50 | 27.12 / 23.6 |
|
| |
|
| cs | - | gi|224140239 | predicted protein [Populus trichocarpa] | 658 | 10 | 20 % | 5.46 / 5.46 | 62.04 / 51.84 | DNA helicase, putative [Ricinus communis] |
|
|
|
| ↓ | 2.45 | gi|118487795 | unknown [Populus trichocarpa] | 1475 | 11 | 37 % | 6 / 6.3 | 42.09 / 35.9 | annexin, putative [Ricinus communis] | - |
|
|
| cs | - | gi|224134068 | predicted protein [Populus trichocarpa] | 329 | 8 | 13 % | 6 / 6.43 | 55.68 / 51.73 | glutamate-1-semialdehyde 2,1-aminomutase [Populus trichocarpa] |
| - |
|
| cs | - | gi|224061286 | predicted protein [Populus trichocarpa] | 211 | 6 | 33 % | 5.24 / 5.48 | 27.47 / 24.28 | AtRABA1f (Arabidopsis Rab GTPase homolog A1f); GTP binding [Arabidopsis thaliana] |
|
|
|
| tw | - | gi|224111564 | mitochondrial beta subunit of F1 ATP synthase [Populus trichocarpa] | 433 | 11 | 23 % | 5 / 5.9 | 68.9 / 59.9 |
| - | |
|
| ↑ | 2.80 | gi|74419004 | glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase [Populus maximowiczii x Populus nigra] | 805 | 10 | 33 % | 6.79 / 6.76 | 49.54 / 37.2 |
|
| |
|
| tw | - | gi|224120086 | predicted protein [Populus trichocarpa] | 542 | 13 | 21 % | 4.6 / 5.2 | 87.58 / 75.4 | heat shock protein, putative [Ricinus communis] |
|
|
|
| ↑ | 2.09 | gi|224139168 | predicted protein [Populus trichocarpa] | 542 | 11 | 17 % | 5.9 / 5.5 | 78.69 / 65.9 | pyruvate decarboxylase [Populus trichocarpa] |
|
|
|
| ↑ | 3.46 | gi|224082496 | predicted protein [Populus trichocarpa] | 246 | 4 | 14 % | 5.49 / 5.39 | 61.43 / 39.28 | peroxidase [Nicotiana tabacum] |
|
|
aData obtained during comparison of protein profiles in IMP 6.0.
bData obtained during identification of proteins in the Mascot database (http://www.matrixscience.com)
cIdentification of unknown or predicted proteins according to the NCBI BlastP database (http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi)
dClassification from the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) database (http://www.genome.jp/kegg/)
eGene Ontology (GO) classification from the UniProt database (http://www.uniprot.org/ )
Fig. 2Functional classification of proteins identified in the leaves (a) and fine roots (b) of S. viminalis
Fig. 3Comparison of effects on S. viminalis and P. × canescens growth on tannery waste. All conclusions were drawn from the results of functional classification of leaf and root proteins that were identified as variable between growth on control soil and on fresh tannery waste. Data for P. × canescens are from Zemleduch-Barylska and Lorenc-Plucińska (2015)