Sang Yun Ha1, Yong-Han Paik2, Jung Wook Yang1, Min Ju Lee1, Hyunsik Bae1, Cheol-Keun Park1. 1. Department of Pathology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. 2. Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate oxidase (NOX)-mediated reactive oxygen species contribute to various liver diseases, including hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Uncertainties remain regarding the prognostic relevance of NOX1 and NOX4 protein expression in HCC. METHODS: NOX1 and NOX4 protein expression was examined by using immunohistochemistry in tumor tissue from 227 HCC patients who underwent hepatectomy. RESULTS: High immunoreactivity for NOX1 was observed in 197 (86.8%) of the 227 HCC cases and low immunoreactivity for NOX4 in 112 (49.3%). NOX1 and NOX4 proteins had opposite prognostic effects. High NOX1 expression was an independent predictor of both shorter recurrence-free survival (RFS) (p<0.01) and shorter overall survival (OS) (p=0.01). Low NOX4 expression was an independent predictor of both shorter RFS (p<0.01) and shorter OS (p=0.01). Subgroup analysis showed that, among patients with normal α-fetoprotein levels, patients with tumor size ≤5.0 cm and patients in Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage A, high NOX1 expression had unfavorable effects on RFS, whereas low NOX4 expression had unfavorable effects on both RFS and OS. CONCLUSIONS: These findings demonstrated that NOX1 and NOX4 protein expression had opposite prognostic effects for HCC patients. Moreover, both proteins had prognostic value in HCC patients with normal α-fetoprotein levels or with early-stage HCC.
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate oxidase (NOX)-mediated reactive oxygen species contribute to various liver diseases, including hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Uncertainties remain regarding the prognostic relevance of NOX1 and NOX4 protein expression in HCC. METHODS:NOX1 and NOX4 protein expression was examined by using immunohistochemistry in tumor tissue from 227 HCCpatients who underwent hepatectomy. RESULTS: High immunoreactivity for NOX1 was observed in 197 (86.8%) of the 227 HCC cases and low immunoreactivity for NOX4 in 112 (49.3%). NOX1 and NOX4 proteins had opposite prognostic effects. High NOX1 expression was an independent predictor of both shorter recurrence-free survival (RFS) (p<0.01) and shorter overall survival (OS) (p=0.01). Low NOX4 expression was an independent predictor of both shorter RFS (p<0.01) and shorter OS (p=0.01). Subgroup analysis showed that, among patients with normal α-fetoprotein levels, patients with tumor size ≤5.0 cm and patients in Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage A, high NOX1 expression had unfavorable effects on RFS, whereas low NOX4 expression had unfavorable effects on both RFS and OS. CONCLUSIONS: These findings demonstrated that NOX1 and NOX4 protein expression had opposite prognostic effects for HCCpatients. Moreover, both proteins had prognostic value in HCCpatients with normal α-fetoprotein levels or with early-stage HCC.
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has a poor prognosis because it is associated with a high incidence of tumor recurrence and metastasis even after hepatectomy.1,2 It is important to predict the outcome of HCCpatients in order to provide timely intervention after hepatectomy.3Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate oxidase (NOX) is a multimeric transmembrane enzyme complex that generates superoxide and hydrogen peroxide from molecular oxygen in response to a wide range of stimuli.4 The mammalianNOX family comprises seven isoforms: NOX1, NOX2, NOX3, NOX4, NOX5, dual oxidase 1, and dual oxidase 2.4,5 NOX-mediated reactive oxygen species (ROS) contribute to various liver diseases, including chronic hepatitis,6 alcohol-induced liver disease,7 cholestatic liver injury,8 hepatic fibrosis,9–11 and HCC.12 NOX-dependent ROS production differs with both tumor origin and NOX isoform.13 The NOX family promotes angiogenesis and is associated with the metastatic potential of many solid tumors.14 NOX1 messenger RNA (mRNA) was up regulated in humancolon cancer and gastric adenocarcinoma.15 NOX4 overexpression has been found in humangastric adenocarcinoma, ovarian cancer, malignant melanoma, and glioma.15,16 A recent study found that ROS levels, superoxide production, and NOX activity were about twofold more elevated in invasive HCC SK-Hep1 cells over those of HepG2 cells.17 Lu et al.12 reported that NOX4 mRNA expression was higher in HCC than in adjacent nontumor tissue and suggested that NOX4 was not a prognostic factor of HCC after hepatectomy. However, uncertainties remain about whether NOX1 and NOX4 proteins are overexpressed in HCC and the prognostic significance of their expression in HCC.In 227 HCCpatients with long-term follow-up, NOX1 and NOX4 protein expression was investigated by immunohistochemistry to determine whether these proteins can serve as prognostic predictors.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
1. Patients
Primary HCC tissues were obtained from 227 patients who underwent hepatectomy from July 2000 to May 2006 at Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea. All patients were clinically diagnosed with HCC according to the guidelines of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.18 Patients were considered for liver resection if they had a single mass in one lobe of liver without evidence of extrahepatic or lymph node metastases. Patients with gross vascular invasion on imaging were only considered for hepatectomy if the main portal vein and the portal branches to the remaining liver were patent. Patients were not considered for hepatectomy if they had a serum total bilirubin level ≥1.5 mg/dL, indocyanine green scores ≥20%, or ascites. All tumor tissues were histologically confirmed. None of the patients had received preoperative or postoperative adjuvant therapy or radiation therapy. The Institutional Review Board of Samsung Medical Center approved this study. Tumor stages were classified according to both the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system19 and Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) staging classification.20 Intrahepatic metastasis and multicentric occurrence were defined according to the previously reported criteria.21 Tumor tissue array blocks were constructed as previously described.22 Two 2-mm cores from paraffin blocks of each specimen were taken. As controls, two cores of normal liver tissue from 12 patients with metastatic colon carcinoma of the liver were included in each array block.All patients were followed by monitoring serum α-fetoprotein levels and three phase dynamic computed tomography scans or magnetic resonance imaging every 3 months after surgery. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) was defined from the date of resection until the date of tumor recurrence, metastasis, or last follow-up. Overall survival (OS) was defined from the date of resection until the date of death or last follow-up.
2. Immunohistochemical analysis
Immunohistochemical staining was performed as previously described.22 Epitope retrieval was performed with 0.01 mol/L citrate buffer at pH 6.0 for 30 minutes in a pressure cooker. The sections were incubated with rabbit polyclonal antibodies to NOX1 (NBP1-83346, 1:400; Novus Biologicals, Littleton, CO, USA) and NOX4 (ab60940, 1:200; Abcam Corp., Cambridge, MA, USA) for 60 minutes at room temperature. To validate the concordance between tissue microarrays and whole tumor sections, NOX1 and NOX4 expression was also detected for 40 corresponding whole tumor sections randomly chosen from the 227 cases. All reactions were performed using appropriate negative and positive controls. No immunoreactivity was observed in tissue sections used as negative controls in which the primary antibodies were replaced by pre-immune rabbit serum. Positive controls (human normal liver and human normal kidney) showed cytoplasmic NOX1 expression in hepatocytes and cytoplasmic NOX4 expression in epithelial cells of convoluted tubules, respectively.Two independent pathologists (C.K.P. and S.Y.H.) who did not know patient characteristics assessed immunohistochemical staining, and any discrepancies were resolved by consensus. Nearly homogeneous cytoplasmic immunostaining with moderate staining intensity was observed. To determine NOX1 or NOX4 expression, the percentage of stained tumor cells was scored from 0% to 100%. NOX1 or NOX4 immunoreactivity was graded as low (0% to 50% stained tumor cells regardless of staining intensity) or high expression (>50% stained tumor cells). Duplicate tissue cores for each tumor showed high levels of homogeneity for the proportion of stained cells. In cases of differences between duplicate tissue cores, the higher score was taken.
3. Statistical analysis
All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software version 18 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). The correlation between NOX1 or NOX4 expression and clinicopathologic features was examined by chi-square test or Fisher exact test. Survival curves were constructed using the Kaplan-Meier method, and differences in survival were evaluated using a log-rank test. Univariate and multivariable analyses of survival were performed using the Cox proportional hazards regression model. We confirmed that there was no multicollinearity among variables by using variance inflation factor, and checked the proportional hazard assumption graphically and confirmed that all variables in Cox proportional hazard model were constants that do not depend on time. The p-values <0.05 were defined as statistically significant.
RESULTS
1. Clinicopathologic characteristics of patients
Table 1 lists the baseline characteristics of the patients. The median age was 53.0 years and 184 (81.1%) were males. Median tumor size was 4.0 cm, and 141 of the 227 tumors (62.1%) were ≤5 cm in size. The median follow-up period was 120.3 months (range, 14.0 to 151.4 months) for survivors. Tumor recurrence was detected in 168 patients (74.0%) (Table 2). Ninety-two patients (40.5%) died of HCC. Of the 109 deaths, 17 were due to non-HCC causes. Eleven of these 17 deaths were due to hepatic failure, four were due to nonhepatic causes (one due to cerebral infarction, one due to myocarditis, one due to aspiration pneumonia, one due to recurred pancreas cancer), and two were due to unknown causes.
Table 1
Baseline Patient Characteristics
Characteristic
No. (%)
Subject no.
227
Age, yr
53.0 (17–76)
Male sex
184 (81.1)
Cirrhosis
117 (51.5)
AFP level, ng/mL*
92.0 (1–1,667,054)
Albumin level, g/dL
4.0 (2.8–5.0)
Etiology
Hepatitis B virus
177 (78.0)
Hepatitis C virus
21 (9.2)
Nonviral
29 (12.8)
Tumor size, cm
4.0 (1–21)
AJCC T-stage
1
97 (42.7)
2
86 (37.9)
3
40 (17.6)
4
4 (1.8)
Data are presented as number (%) or median (range).
AFP, α-fetoprotein; AJCC, American Joint Committee on Cancer.
Partial data were not available (n=218).
Table 2
Clinical and Tumor Characteristics of the Patients according to NOX1 and NOX4 Protein Expression
Characteristic
No.
High NOX1 expression
p-value
No.
Low NOX4 expression
p-value
Age, yr
≤55
135
117 (86.7)
0.95
135
77 (57.0)
0.01
>55
92
80 (87.0)
92
35 (38.8)
Gender
Female
43
38 (88.4)
0.73
43
21 (48.8)
0.94
Male
184
159 (86.4)
184
91 (49.5)
Tumor size, cm
≤5.0
141
121 (85.8)
0.58
141
69 (48.9)
0.88
>5.0
86
76 (88.4)
86
43 (50.0)
Edmondson grade
I
21
17 (81.0)
0.26
21
6 (28.6)
0.01
II
156
139 (89.1)
156
73 (46.8)
III
50
41 (82.0)
50
33 (66.0)
Microvascular invasion
(−)
100
85 (85.0)
0.48
100
39 (39.0)
0.01
(+)
127
112 (88.2)
127
73 (57.5)
Major portal vein invasion
(−)
217
188 (86.6)
1
217
103 (47.5)
0.01
(+)
10
9 (90.0)
10
9 (90.0)
Intrahepatic metastasis
(−)
171
144 (84.2)
0.04
171
75 (43.9)
<0.01
(+)
56
53 (94.6)
56
37 (66.1)
Multicentric occurrence
(−)
217
190 (87.6)
0.13
217
105 (48.4)
0.21
(+)
10
7 (70.0)
10
7 (70.0)
AJCC T-stage
1
97
82 (84.5)
0.63
97
37 (38.1)
0.01
2
86
74 (86.0)
86
47 (54.7)
3
40
37 (92.5)
40
26 (65.0)
4
4
4 (100.0)
4
2 (50.0)
BCLC stage
A
122
104 (85.2)
0.84
122
57 (46.7)
0.08
B
94
83 (88.3)
94
46 (48.9)
C
11
10 (90.9)
11
9 (81.8)
Albumin level, g/dL
>3.5
200
174 (87.0)
0.76
200
98 (49.0)
0.78
≤3.5
27
23 (85.2)
27
14 (51.9)
AFP level, ng/mL*
≤20
84
72 (85.7)
0.74
84
56 (66.7)
<0.01
>20
134
117 (87.3)
134
55 (41.0)
Etiology
Nonviral
29
28 (96.6)
0.22
29
7 (24.1)
<0.01
HBV
177
150 (84.7)
177
98 (55.4)
HCV
21
19 (90.5)
21
7 (33.3)
Liver cirrhosis
(−)
110
97 (88.2)
0.55
110
60 (54.5)
0.26
(+)
117
100 (85.5)
117
55 (47.0)
Recurrence site
Intrahepatic
134
126 (94.0)
0.13
134
56 (41.8)
0.15
Extrahepatic
19
18 (94.7)
19
10 (52.6)
Intra- & extrahepatic
15
12 (80.0)
15
3 (20.0)
Early recurrence (≤2 yr)
(−)
98
76 (77.6)
<0.01
98
28 (28.6)
<0.01
(+)
129
121 (93.8)
129
84 (65.1)
Late recurrence (>2 yr)
(−)†
59
41 (69.5)
0.03
59
13 (22.0)
0.08
(+)
39
35 (89.7)
39
15 (38.5)
Death
(−)
118
95 (80.5)
<0.01
118
44 (40.4)
<0.01
(+)
109
102 (93.6)
109
71 (60.2)
Data are presented as number (%).
NOX, nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate oxidase; AJCC, American Joint Committee on Cancer; BCLC, Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer; AFP, α-fetoprotein; HBV, hepatitis B virus; HCV, hepatitis C virus.
Partial data were not available (n=218);
No early or late recurrence.
2. NOX1 and NOX4 protein expression in HCC
Both NOX1 and NOX4 expression were observed in the cytoplasm in 40% to 60% of normal hepatocytes with weak staining intensity. In HCC, immunoreactivity for both NOX1 and NOX4 were observed in the cytoplasm in 1% to 95% of tumor cells with moderate staining intensity. High NOX1 immunoreactivity was observed in 197 of the 227 HCC cases (86.8%) (Fig. 1A). High NOX1 expression was significantly correlated with intrahepatic metastasis (p=0.04), early recurrence (p<0.01), late recurrence (p=0.03), and death (p<0.01). Low NOX4 immunoreactivity was observed in 112 (49.3%) of the 227 HCC cases (Fig. 1B). Low NOX4 expression was significantly correlated with younger age (p=0.01), higher Edmondson grade (p=0.01), microvascular invasion (p=0.01), major portal vein invasion (p=0.01), intrahepatic metastasis (p<0.01), higher AJCC T-stage (p=0.01), higher α-fetoprotein level (p<0.01), viral etiology (p<0.01), early recurrence (p<0.01), and death (p<0.01) (Table 2).
Fig. 1
Immunostaining of NOX1 and NOX4 in hepatocellular carcinoma shows high cytoplasmic immunoreactivity for NOX1 (A) and low cytoplasmic immunoreactivity for NOX4 (B) (horseradish peroxidase stain, ×200).
3. Correlation between NOX1 and NOX4 expression and prognosis of HCC patients
The RFS and OS rates for 227 HCCpatients were 37.4% and 74.7% at 3 years, 32.4% and 65.2% at 5 years, 26.5% and 56.8% at 7 years, and 25.8% and 50.3% at 9 years, respectively. On univariable analysis, larger tumor size, Edmondson grade III, microvascular invasion, major portal vein invasion, intrahepatic metastasis, and lower albumin level showed unfavorable effects on both RFS and OS. Higher α-fetoprotein level and viral etiology showed unfavorable effects on RFS (Tables 3 and 4).
Table 3
Univariate and Multivariable Analyses of Recurrence-Free Survival in 227 Hepatocellular Carcinomas
High NOX1 expression showed an unfavorable effect on RFS (Table 3). The 5-year RFS rate of the high NOX1 expression group was significantly lower than that of the low NOX1 expression group (27.6% vs 63.3%) (p<0.001) (Fig. 2A). The mean RFS of the high NOX1 expression group and the low NOX1 expression group were 42.9 and 97.3 months, respectively. Subgroup analysis showed that among patients with α-fetoprotein ≤ 20 ng/mL (n=84), patients with tumor size ≤5.0 cm (n=141), and patients at BCLC stage A (n=122), there were significant differences in RFS between high NOX1 expression groups (n=72, n=121, and n=104, respectively) and low NOX1 expression groups (p=0.020, p=0.013, and p=0.029, respectively) (Fig. 2B–D).
Fig. 2
Kaplan-Meier survival curves showing recurrence-free survival among all patients (A), patients with α-fetoprotein (AFP) ≤20 ng/mL (B), patients with tumor size ≤5.0 cm (C), and patients at Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage A (D) according to NOX1 expression.
High NOX1 expression showed an unfavorable effect on OS (Table 4). The 5-year OS rate of the high NOX1 expression group was significantly lower than that of the low NOX1 expression group (63.5% vs 76.7%) (p=0.014) (Fig. 3A). The mean OS of the high NOX1 expression group and the low NOX1 expression group were 92.9 and 120.0 months, respectively. Subgroup analysis showed that among patients with α-fetoprotein ≤20 ng/mL (n=84), patients with tumor size ≤5.0 cm (n=141), and patients at BCLC stage A (n=122), there were no significant differences in OS between high NOX1 expression groups and low NOX1 expression groups (p=0.128, p=0.131, and p=0.167, respectively) (Fig. 3B–D). However, subgroup analyses including poor prognostic counterpart factors such as α-fetoprotein >20 ng/mL, tumor size >5.0 cm, and BCLC stage B or C showed no significant differences in RFS or OS.
Fig. 3
Kaplan-Meier survival curves showing overall survival among all patients (A), patients with α-fetoprotein (AFP) ≤20 ng/mL (B), patients with tumor size ≤5.0 cm (C), and patients at Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage A (D) according to the NOX1 expression.
Low NOX4 expression showed an unfavorable effect on RFS (Table 3). The 5-year RFS rate of the low NOX4 expression group was significantly lower than that of the high NOX4 expression group (13.8% vs 50.5%) (p<0.001) (Fig. 4A). The mean RFS of the low NOX4 expression group and the high NOX4 expression group were 26.3 and 72.6 months, respectively. Subgroup analysis showed that among patients with α-fetoprotein ≤20 ng/mL (n=84), patients with tumor size ≤5.0 cm (n=141), and patients at BCLC stage A (n=122), there were significant differences in RFS between low NOX4 expression groups (n=28, n=69, and n=57, respectively) and high NOX4 expression groups (p<0.001, p<0.001, and p<0.001, respectively) (Fig. 4B–D). A Low NOX4 expression showed an unfavorable effect on OS (Table 4). The 5-year OS rate of the low NOX4 expression group was significantly lower than that of the high NOX4 expression group (51.8% vs 78.1%) (p<0.001) (Fig. 5A). The mean OS of the low NOX4 expression group and the high NOX4 expression group were 80.7 and 110.7 months, respectively. Subgroup analysis showed that among patients with α-fetoprotein ≤20 ng/mL (n=84) and patients with tumor size ≤5.0 cm (n=141), there were significant differences in OS between low NOX4 expression groups and high NOX4 expression groups (p=0.009 and p=0.011, respectively) (Fig. 5B and C). Among patients at BCLC stage A (n=122), the low NOX4 expression group tended to show an unfavorable effect on OS (p=0.085) (Fig. 5D). However, subgroup analyses including poor prognostic counterpart factors such as α-fetoprotein >20 ng/mL, tumor size >5.0 cm, and BCLC stage B or C showed no significant differences in RFS or OS.
Fig. 4
Kaplan-Meier survival curves showing recurrence-free survival among all patients (A), patients with α-fetoprotein (AFP) ≤20 ng/mL (B), patients with tumor size ≤5.0 cm (C), and patients at Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage A (D) according to NOX4 expression.
Kaplan-Meier survival curves showing overall survival among all patients (A), patients with α-fetoprotein (AFP) ≤20 ng/mL (B), patients with tumor size ≤5.0 cm (C), and patients at Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage A (D) according to NOX4 expression.
Multivariable analysis revealed that intrahepatic metastasis was independent predictor of both shorter RFS and shorter OS. Microvascular invasion was independent predictor of shorter RFS. High NOX1 expression and low NOX4 expression were independent predictors of both shorter RFS (p<0.01 and p<0.01, respectively) and shorter OS (p=0.01 and p=0.01, respectively) (Tables 3 and 4).
DISCUSSION
In mammalian cells, low levels of ROS play an important role in physiological redox signaling. However, low levels of ROS can also induce oxidative stress to cause genomic instability, DNA damage, and possible cancer progression.23 Elevated oxidative stress and ROS production by tumor cells and micro-environmental cells contribute to tumor progression and metastasis.24 Supporting a role for NOX1 in colon carcinogenesis, activating mutations in the proto-oncogene K-Ras were discovered in concert with NOX1 overexpression in humancolon cancers.25This study reports opposite prognostic effects of NOX1 and NOX4 proteins on HCCpatients for the first time. High NOX1 protein expression was an independent predictor of both shorter RFS and shorter OS. Low NOX4 protein expression was an independent predictor of both shorter RFS and shorter OS. In mammals, NOX1 produces superoxide and NOX4 produces H2O2.26 Inhibition of NOX1 gene expression with small interfering RNA in humancolon cancer cells decreased tumor growth and angiogenesis markers in vivo.27 NOX4 knockdown caused increased cell proliferation in both humanHCC cells and human and mouse hepatocytes, suggesting that NOX4 plays a negative role in liver cell proliferation, which is consistent with the result of this study.28 Lu et al.12 reported that NOX4 mRNA expression was not a prognostic factor for RFS or OS in 107 HCCpatients. We investigated the prognostic roles of NOX1 and NOX4 in 227 HCCpatients with long-term follow-up.In this study, tumor recurrence was detected in 57 of 84 patients (67.9%) with normal serum α-fetoprotein levels, in 100 of 141 patients (70.9%) with tumor size ≤5.0 cm, and in 83 of 122 patients (68.0%) at BCLC stage A. Within these patient populations, high NOX1 expression groups showed unfavorable effects on RFS (Fig. 2) and low NOX4 expression groups showed unfavorable effects on both RFS and OS (Figs 4 and 5). Serum α-fetoprotein is an important predictor of HCC recurrence after surgery. Identification of poor prognosis subpopulations for early stage HCCpatients is crucial to the optimization of personalized treatment. NOX1 and NOX4 protein expression may help to predict recurrence risk in patients with normal serum α-fetoprotein levels and early stage HCC after tumor resection. Moreover, NOX1 could be a promising therapeutic target for HCC. ML171, a specific NOX1 small-molecule inhibitor, blocked the formation of functional invadopodia in humancolon cancer cells and was defined as a potential therapeutic agent for inhibition of cancer cell invasion.29 Liu et al.30 reported that blockade of NOX1 with ML171 alleviated enhanced non-small cell lung cancer metastasis by TLR4 signaling and suggested that NOX1/ROS was a promising therapeutic target for non-small cell lung cancer. Due to a high degree of similarity to currently used drugs, the pharmacokinetics and safety data of ML171 likely enable the use of this compound in vivo.31Our results suggest that NOX1 and NOX4 are potential new markers for predicting HCC prognosis after hepatectomy. Patients with high NOX1 expression or low NOX4 expression are considered candidates for adjuvant treatment after surgical resection. However, the molecular mechanism for these opposite prognostic effects is unknown.For the first time, this study demonstrated that NOX1 and NOX4 protein expression had opposite prognostic effects on HCCpatients. Moreover, both proteins had prognostic values in HCCpatients with early stage HCC or normal serum α-fetoprotein levels. These findings also indicate possible new lines of research for developing therapeutic approaches to targeting NOXs. Further study is needed to identify the underlying molecular mechanism of NOX1 and NOX4 in the development and progression of HCC.
Authors: Kendra D Martyn; Linda M Frederick; Katharina von Loehneysen; Mary C Dinauer; Ulla G Knaus Journal: Cell Signal Date: 2005-05-31 Impact factor: 4.315
Authors: Samuele De Minicis; Ekihiro Seki; Yong-Han Paik; Christoph H Osterreicher; Yuzo Kodama; Johannes Kluwe; Luciano Torozzi; Katsumi Miyai; Antonio Benedetti; Robert F Schwabe; David A Brenner Journal: Hepatology Date: 2010-10 Impact factor: 17.425
Authors: Javier Egea; Isabel Fabregat; Yves M Frapart; Pietro Ghezzi; Agnes Görlach; Thomas Kietzmann; Kateryna Kubaichuk; Ulla G Knaus; Manuela G Lopez; Gloria Olaso-Gonzalez; Andreas Petry; Rainer Schulz; Jose Vina; Paul Winyard; Kahina Abbas; Opeyemi S Ademowo; Catarina B Afonso; Ioanna Andreadou; Haike Antelmann; Fernando Antunes; Mutay Aslan; Markus M Bachschmid; Rui M Barbosa; Vsevolod Belousov; Carsten Berndt; David Bernlohr; Esther Bertrán; Alberto Bindoli; Serge P Bottari; Paula M Brito; Guia Carrara; Ana I Casas; Afroditi Chatzi; Niki Chondrogianni; Marcus Conrad; Marcus S Cooke; João G Costa; Antonio Cuadrado; Pham My-Chan Dang; Barbara De Smet; Bilge Debelec-Butuner; Irundika H K Dias; Joe Dan Dunn; Amanda J Edson; Mariam El Assar; Jamel El-Benna; Péter Ferdinandy; Ana S Fernandes; Kari E Fladmark; Ulrich Förstermann; Rashid Giniatullin; Zoltán Giricz; Anikó Görbe; Helen Griffiths; Vaclav Hampl; Alina Hanf; Jan Herget; Pablo Hernansanz-Agustín; Melanie Hillion; Jingjing Huang; Serap Ilikay; Pidder Jansen-Dürr; Vincent Jaquet; Jaap A Joles; Balaraman Kalyanaraman; Danylo Kaminskyy; Mahsa Karbaschi; Marina Kleanthous; Lars-Oliver Klotz; Bato Korac; Kemal Sami Korkmaz; Rafal Koziel; Damir Kračun; Karl-Heinz Krause; Vladimír Křen; Thomas Krieg; João Laranjinha; Antigone Lazou; Huige Li; Antonio Martínez-Ruiz; Reiko Matsui; Gethin J McBean; Stuart P Meredith; Joris Messens; Verónica Miguel; Yuliya Mikhed; Irina Milisav; Lidija Milković; Antonio Miranda-Vizuete; Miloš Mojović; María Monsalve; Pierre-Alexis Mouthuy; John Mulvey; Thomas Münzel; Vladimir Muzykantov; Isabel T N Nguyen; Matthias Oelze; Nuno G Oliveira; Carlos M Palmeira; Nikoletta Papaevgeniou; Aleksandra Pavićević; Brandán Pedre; Fabienne Peyrot; Marios Phylactides; Gratiela G Pircalabioru; Andrew R Pitt; Henrik E Poulsen; Ignacio Prieto; Maria Pia Rigobello; Natalia Robledinos-Antón; Leocadio Rodríguez-Mañas; Anabela P Rolo; Francis Rousset; Tatjana Ruskovska; Nuno Saraiva; Shlomo Sasson; Katrin Schröder; Khrystyna Semen; Tamara Seredenina; Anastasia Shakirzyanova; Geoffrey L Smith; Thierry Soldati; Bebiana C Sousa; Corinne M Spickett; Ana Stancic; Marie José Stasia; Holger Steinbrenner; Višnja Stepanić; Sebastian Steven; Kostas Tokatlidis; Erkan Tuncay; Belma Turan; Fulvio Ursini; Jan Vacek; Olga Vajnerova; Kateřina Valentová; Frank Van Breusegem; Lokman Varisli; Elizabeth A Veal; A Suha Yalçın; Olha Yelisyeyeva; Neven Žarković; Martina Zatloukalová; Jacek Zielonka; Rhian M Touyz; Andreas Papapetropoulos; Tilman Grune; Santiago Lamas; Harald H H W Schmidt; Fabio Di Lisa; Andreas Daiber Journal: Redox Biol Date: 2017-05-18 Impact factor: 11.799
Authors: Valeska Helfinger; Florian Freiherr von Gall; Nina Henke; Michael M Kunze; Tobias Schmid; Flavia Rezende; Juliana Heidler; Ilka Wittig; Heinfried H Radeke; Viola Marschall; Karen Anderson; Ajay M Shah; Simone Fulda; Bernhard Brüne; Ralf P Brandes; Katrin Schröder Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2021-03-16 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Sandra J Page; Maria M Rivera; David E Kleiner; Xiongce Zhao; Sungyoung Auh; Elaine F Remmers; Theo Heller Journal: Hepatol Commun Date: 2017-10-23
Authors: E Crosas-Molist; E Bertran; I Rodriguez-Hernandez; C Herraiz; G Cantelli; À Fabra; V Sanz-Moreno; I Fabregat Journal: Oncogene Date: 2016-12-12 Impact factor: 9.867