| Literature DB >> 27281375 |
Judit Plutzer1, Panagiotis Karanis2.
Abstract
Outbreak incidents raise the question of whether the less frequent aetiological agents of outbreaks are really less frequent in water. Alternatively, waterborne transmission could be relevant, but the lack of attention and rapid, sensitive methods to recover and detect the exogenous stages in water may keep them under-recognized. High quality information on the prevalence and detection of less frequent waterborne protozoa, such as Cyclospora cayetanensis, Toxoplasma gondii, Isospora belli, Balantidium coli, Blastocystis hominis, Entamoeba histolytica and other free-living amoebae (FLA), are not available. This present paper discusses the detection tools applied for the water surveillance of the neglected waterborne protozoa mentioned above and provides future perspectives.Entities:
Keywords: Detection; Neglected Parasites; Prevalence; Water; Waterborne
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27281375 DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2016.05.085
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Water Res ISSN: 0043-1354 Impact factor: 11.236