Literature DB >> 27280711

Acting and anticipating: Impact of outcome-compatible distractor depends on response selection efficiency.

Davood G Gozli1, Greg Huffman1, Jay Pratt1.   

Abstract

Action selection is thought to involve selection of the action's sensory outcomes. This notion is supported when encountering a distractor that resembles a learned response-outcome biases response selection. Some evidence, however, suggests that a larger contribution of stimulus-based response selection leaves little role for outcome-based selection, especially in forced-choice tasks with easily identifiable target stimuli. In the present study, we asked whether the contribution of outcome-based selection depends on the ease and efficiency of stimulus-based selection. If so, then efficient stimulus-based response selection should reduce the impact of an irrelevant distractor that resemble a response-outcome. We manipulated efficiency of stimulus-based selection by varying the spatial relationship between stimulus and response (Experiment 1) and by varying stimulus discriminability (Experiments 2). We hypothesized that with efficient stimulus-based selection, outcome-based processes will play a weaker role in response selection, and performance will be less susceptible to outcome-compatible or -incompatible distractors. By contrast, when stimulus-based selection is relatively inefficient, outcome-based processes will play a stronger role in response selection, and performance should be more susceptible to outcome-compatible or -incompatible distractors. Confirming our predictions, our results showed stronger impact of the distractors when stimulus-based response selection was relatively inefficient. Finally, results of a control experiment (Experiment 3) suggested that learning the consistent response-outcome mapping is necessary for obtaining the effect of these distractors. We conclude that outcome-based processes do contribute to response selection in forced-choice tasks, and that this contribution varies with the efficiency of stimulus-based response selection. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved).

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27280711     DOI: 10.1037/xhp0000238

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  4 in total

1.  Free choice tasks as random generation tasks: an investigation through working memory manipulations.

Authors:  Christoph Naefgen; Markus Janczyk
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-05-31       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Reaching Into the Unknown: Actions, Goal Hierarchies, and Explorative Agency.

Authors:  Davood G Gozli; Nevia Dolcini
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-03-07

Review 3.  Motivational sensitivity of outcome-response priming: Experimental research and theoretical models.

Authors:  Poppy Watson; Reinout W Wiers; Bernhard Hommel; Sanne de Wit
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-12

4.  "Two Minds Don't Blink Alike": The Attentional Blink Does Not Occur in a Joint Context.

Authors:  Merryn D Constable; Jay Pratt; Timothy N Welsh
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-09-12
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.