Literature DB >> 27280453

The Psychometric Properties of a Modified Sit-to-Stand Test With Use of the Upper Extremities in Institutionalized Older Adults.

Melanie Le Berre1, David Apap2, Jade Babcock2, Sarah Bray2, Esther Gareau3, Kathleen Chassé3, Nicole Lévesque3, Shawn M Robbins4.   

Abstract

Current sit-to-stand protocols do not permit use of upper extremities, limiting the protocols' utility for institutionalized older adults with diminished physical function. The objective of this study was to modify a 30-s sit-to-stand protocol to allow for arm use and to examine test-retest reliability and convergent validity; 54 institutionalized older adult men (age = 91 ± 3 year) performed the 30-s sit-to-stand twice within a span of 3 to 7 days. Results suggest good test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient = .84) and convergent validity with the Timed Up and Go Test (r = -.62). This modified 30-s sit-to-stand can be used to assess physical function performance in institutionalized older adults and will ensure that individuals with lower physical function capacity can complete the test, thus eliminating the floor effect demonstrated with other sit-to-stand protocols.
© The Author(s) 2016.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Sit to Stand; Timed Up and Go; older adults; reliability; validity

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27280453     DOI: 10.1177/0031512516653388

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Mot Skills        ISSN: 0031-5125


  3 in total

Review 1.  Physical and Motor Fitness Tests for Older Adults Living in Nursing Homes: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Luis Galhardas; Armando Raimundo; Jesús Del Pozo-Cruz; José Marmeleira
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-04-21       Impact factor: 4.614

2.  Modified 30-second Sit to Stand test predicts falls in a cohort of institutionalized older veterans.

Authors:  Eva V Applebaum; Dominic Breton; Zhuo Wei Feng; An-Tchi Ta; Kayley Walsh; Kathleen Chassé; Shawn M Robbins
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-05-02       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  A Randomised, Comparative, Effectiveness Trial Evaluating Low- versus High-Level Supervision of an Exercise Intervention for Women with Breast Cancer: The SAFE Trial.

Authors:  Rosalind R Spence; Carolina X Sandler; Benjamin Singh; Jodie Tanner; Christopher Pyke; Elizabeth Eakin; Dimitrios Vagenas; Sandra C Hayes
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 6.639

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.