Interest in materials that undergo singlet fission (SF) has been catalyzed by the potential to exceed the Shockley-Queisser limit of solar power conversion efficiency. In conventional materials, the mechanism of SF is an intermolecular process (xSF), which is mediated by charge transfer (CT) states and depends sensitively on crystal packing or molecular collisions. In contrast, recently reported covalently coupled pentacenes yield ∼2 triplets per photon absorbed in individual molecules: the hallmark of intramolecular singlet fission (iSF). However, the mechanism of iSF is unclear. Here, using multireference electronic structure calculations and transient absorption spectroscopy, we establish that iSF can occur via a direct coupling mechanism that is independent of CT states. We show that a near-degeneracy in electronic state energies induced by vibronic coupling to intramolecular modes of the covalent dimer allows for strong mixing between the correlated triplet pair state and the local excitonic state, despite weak direct coupling.
Interest in materials that undergo singlet fission (SF) has been catalyzed by the potential to exceed the Shockley-Queisser limit of solar power conversion efficiency. In conventional materials, the mechanism of SF is an intermolecular process (xSF), which is mediated by charge transfer (CT) states and depends sensitively on crystal packing or molecular collisions. In contrast, recently reported covalently coupled pentacenes yield ∼2 triplets per photon absorbed in individual molecules: the hallmark of intramolecular singlet fission (iSF). However, the mechanism of iSF is unclear. Here, using multireference electronic structure calculations and transient absorption spectroscopy, we establish that iSF can occur via a direct coupling mechanism that is independent of CT states. We show that a near-degeneracy in electronic state energies induced by vibronic coupling to intramolecular modes of the covalent dimer allows for strong mixing between the correlated triplet pair state and the local excitonic state, despite weak direct coupling.
Singlet fission, the process
by which one singlet exciton splits into two triplet excitons, is
proving an important property for materials used in third-generation
solar cells and photodetectors, among other optoelectronic devices.[1−3] Unfortunately, technological applications are limited by the small
number of organic chromophores that undergo efficient singlet fission,[4,5] and are largely restricted to molecular crystals of oligoacenes
and related materials that exhibit intermolecular singlet fission
(xSF).[6−10] Insights into the mechanism of xSF have been obtained by tuning
spatial interchromophore interactions;[6,11−14] however, the sensitivity of the mechanism to crystal packing orientations
poses a significant challenge. As such, devices based on xSF are limited
by the lack of high throughput processing strategies to create highly
ordered molecular structures. In contrast, recently reported efficient
intramolecular singlet fission (iSF) materials[15−22] offer significant advantages in terms of their tunable molecular
and electronic structure, solution processability, and the ability
to form tailored interfaces.[23−27] However, a limited understanding of the fundamental process of triplet
pair (2×T1) formation hinders the design of versatile
iSF materials. It is therefore imperative to uncover the detailed
mechanism of iSF and to establish its relationship to chemical structure.
Current literature on the mechanism of xSF is in general agreement
that charge-transfer (CT) states play a significant role in mediating
the coupling between local excitonic (LE) singlet states formed upon
photon absorption and the correlated triplet pair[1](TT) or multiexcitonic (ME) state.[28−34] In addition, the CT-mediated mechanism has been implicated in iSF
polymers, using strong-donor/strong-acceptor interactions along the
conjugated backbone and leading to high yields of triplet pairs upon
photoexcitation in dilute solution.[16,35] However, iSF
materials that operate by this mechanism can suffer from relatively
short triplet lifetimes and parasitic loss pathways involving charge-separated
and dark singlet states,[16] decreasing the
net yield of triplet pairs.Recently, covalently coupled pentacene
dimers were synthesized
and demonstrated to yield triplet pairs nearly quantitatively (∼200%
triplet yield) by ultrafast, sub-picosecond iSF.[15,18,22] From a practical standpoint, bipentacenes
are the first family of iSF chromophores with excited state dynamics
on time scales comparable to xSF in crystals. Although it is known
that pentacenes meet the energetic criteria for singlet fission, where
the energy of the singlet state is at least twice the energy of the
triplet state, E[S1] ≥ 2E[T1], the mechanism of iSF in pentacene dimers
is unclear. In particular, the role of CT states in mediating iSF
is called into question: low-lying CT states are not expected based
on the molecular structure, and experimental measurements of iSF rates
show relative insensitivity to changes in solvent properties. This
raises the possibility of an alternate direct coupling mechanism,
where the correlated triplet state is directly populated from the
singlet manifold, a pathway previously ruled out in the case of xSF
materials (Figure A).[30,31,34,36,37] Since the rates of
iSF and triplet–triplet recombination vary dramatically as
a function of the coupling interactions in the bipentacene, it is
clear that structure–property relationships can be exploited
to control excited state dynamics and to test different mechanisms
for the SF process.[38]
Figure 1
(A) Direct (in green)
and charge transfer mediated (in red) mechanisms
of singlet fission. (B) Molecules studied in this manuscript, where
the abbreviations represent bipentacene and its dihedral angle θ
(BP-θ) where θ = 37°, 42°, and 57° for
the various twist angles. (C) Schematic excited state rates that depend
on dihedral angle, θ, after excitation () to the singlet state (S1): rate of intramolecular
singlet fission (τiSF) and the rate of triplet pair
(2×T1) recombination (τrec).
(A) Direct (in green)
and charge transfer mediated (in red) mechanisms
of singlet fission. (B) Molecules studied in this manuscript, where
the abbreviations represent bipentacene and its dihedral angle θ
(BP-θ) where θ = 37°, 42°, and 57° for
the various twist angles. (C) Schematic excited state rates that depend
on dihedral angle, θ, after excitation () to the singlet state (S1): rate of intramolecular
singlet fission (τiSF) and the rate of triplet pair
(2×T1) recombination (τrec).Here, we start by investigating
the direct coupling mechanism,
where a vibronically induced degeneracy between the local excitonic
(LE) and multiexcitonic (ME) states leads to ultrafast iSF despite
a small coupling matrix element between the LE and ME states. We identify
a specific, high-frequency, intramolecular vibrational mode that assists
direct population transfer from the LE state to the ME state through
an avoided crossing (see Supporting Information movie). This demonstrates that ultrafast iSF can occur via
the direct coupling mechanism in covalently linked pentacene dimers
and does not require CT mediation. We note that an avoided crossing
previously identified along an intermonomer mode in cofacial pentacene
dimers was shown to be an artifact of the calculation method,[32,36] and although intramonomer ring-breathing modes have been identified
as important in xSF,[39,40] their role has not been clearly
established. We also investigate the possibility of a CT-mediated
superexchange mechanism for iSF in bipentacenes. We show that although
iSF rates sensitively depend on the dihedral angle, CT state energies
are largely independent of this factor. Experimental measurements
establish the independence of iSF rates on solvent properties, specifically
orientational polarizability. Furthermore, using both theory and experiment,
we quantify the role of structural factors (Figure B) by studying the change in rates of iSF
with the dihedral angle, θ, between monomers (Figure C). While the direct coupling
mechanism correctly predicts the observed change in iSF rate with
dihedral angle, the indirect couplings that drive CT-mediated singlet
fission do not show concomitant change. Taken together, these insights
into the mechanism of iSF from experiment and theory suggest a new
class of materials where the direct coupling mechanism is important.
The
Excited Adiabatic and Diabatic States of BP-37
We begin our
theoretical investigation with the parent bipentacene,
BP-37, where the notation indicates the calculated dihedral angle
of the minimum energy structure, θ = 37°. This compound
is a simplified version of the experimentally measured BP-2H, which
undergoes iSF with a 0.76 ps time constant in ∼200% triplet
yield, followed by triplet pair recombination with a time constant
of 450 ps.[15] In the truncated version,
the solubilizing tri-isopropylsilyl groups are replaced with hydrogens.
We establish that the solubilizing groups present in the experimental
study do not affect the electronic structure of the monomer significantly
(Supporting Information), in agreement
with previous work.[41] We optimize the geometry
of the substituted pentacene monomer and establish that its geometry
changes little upon dimerization. This allows us to define the dimer
reference geometry as two substituted pentacene monomers linked through
a covalent bond of length 1.48 Å at the 2- and 2′-positions
(Figure B). The excited
state energies of BP-37 are obtained from complete active space self-consistent
field theory (CASSCF) calculations with extended multiconfiguration
quasi-degenerate perturbation theory (XMCQDPT).[32,42] The adiabatic eigenstates obtained from these calculations are labeled S, where i = 0 indicates the ground state and higher values of i represent the excited states. Throughout this manuscript, we also
employ quasi-diabatic states constructed by rotating the adiabatic
states into a local state basis. The reference diabatic states are
labeled following standard notation where the first index of the label
refers to monomer A and the second index refers to monomer B in the
dimer. The low-lying diabatic states are shown in Figure and correspond to the ground
state gg, the ME state, tt, the
two singlet LE states, eg and ge, the two CT states, ac and ca,
and the doubly excited states, dg and gd. We will use these adiabatic and diabatic states to aid in the analysis
of both the direct coupling and CT-mediated superexchange pathways
for iSF in bipentacenes.
Figure 2
Eight lowest diabatic configurations (excited
states in gray boxes)
represented using the highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) and
lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO) on each monomer (A and
B), highlighting the various states: charge transfer (CT), multiexcitonic
(ME), doubly excited (DE), and local excitonic (LE).
Eight lowest diabatic configurations (excited
states in gray boxes)
represented using the highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) and
lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO) on each monomer (A and
B), highlighting the various states: charge transfer (CT), multiexcitonic
(ME), doubly excited (DE), and local excitonic (LE).
The Direct Coupling Mechanism
We
find that an eight-orbital/eight-electron (8o8e) active space
is necessary to yield accurate excited adiabatic state energies for
the dimer,[17,43,44] and our results are shown in Table . In order to quantify the direct coupling mechanism
we perform a rotation of the adiabatic states into a localized, diabatic
state basis.[29,30,45−47] Unfortunately, using the 4-fold diabatization scheme[48,49] (Supporting Information) in the 8o8e
active space yields inaccurate quasi-diabatic state configurations
that account for <85% of the higher lying adiabatic states. Therefore,
we construct an accurate diabatic state representation of the Hamiltonian
at the 8o8e level of theory by including only the three lowest lying
adiabatic excited states shown in Table . We analyze the contribution to the excited
adiabatic states from individual state configurations and find no
significant CT character in states within 1 eV of the first excited
state. The adiabatic state with primarily ME character (S1) is slightly higher in energy than the adiabatic states that have
primarily LE character (S2 and S3). We find
that there is weak direct coupling between the LE and ME states, at the reference dimer geometry
and that
the energy difference between the LE and ME states (∼50 meV)
is small, as compared to previously reported values for other acenes.[12,30−32] The near coincidence of energies of the LE and ME
states and the large energy gap between these states and the states
with significant CT character suggests a difference in the mechanism
of iSF in the present molecules from an earlier study of xSF in a
staggered cofacial pentacene dimer.[32]
Table 1
Lowest Vertical Excitation Energies
of the Covalent Dimer at the Reference Geometry
state
8o8e vertical energy (eV)
S1
1.96a
S2
1.96
S3
2.01
Experimental bright state at 1.88
eV.
Table 2
Diabatic
4-State Hamiltonian Matrix
Calculated Using an 8o8e Active Space (in meV) at the Reference Geometry
of BP-37
gg
ge
eg
tt
gg
0.0
–18.7
–18.7
–27.0
ge
–18.7
1961.2
0.8
–2.2
eg
–18.7
0.8
1961.2
–2.2
tt
–27.0
–2.2
–2.2
2009.7
Experimental bright state at 1.88
eV.The small energy separation suggests that vibrational relaxation
might induce a change in the character of the lowest singlet state,
necessary for efficient iSF. The next step is to identify key vibrational
modes that couple strongly to the electronic states and to evaluate
their role in promoting mixing of the LE and ME states. Since BP-37
is a weakly coupled dimer, we focus on the normal modes of the substituted
pentacene monomer. We project the geometric distortion accompanying
relaxation, from the ground state structure (vertical excitation)
to the optimized S1 and T1 monomer structures,
onto the corresponding set of normal modes. We find a dominant monomer
ring-breathing mode at 1435 cm–1 based on the magnitude
of energy changes along the relaxation pathway and a significant Huang–Rhys
factor (Supporting Information). Not surprisingly,
this mode is consistent with the vibronic progression spectrum of
an unsubstituted pentacene monomer[50,51] and in agreement
with previous work that suggests the importance of a ring-breathing
mode,[39,40] although an avoided crossing has not been
identified.We use this ring-breathing mode to generate a two-dimensional
potential
energy surface (PES) for the excited states along the dimensionless
coordinate, Q, corresponding to the two monomer normal
modes at 1435 cm–1. We use an inexpensive and efficient
occupation restricted multiple active space spin flip (ORMAS-SF) approach
to rapidly scan the PES and identify geometries of interest.[52,53] A limited number of XMCQDPT calculations are then performed with
an 8o8e active space at these geometries to obtain accurate excited
state energies. Performing a diabatization as described earlier, we
obtain three excited diabatic state potential energy surfaces along
the diagonal of vector Q, where Q = (0,0)
corresponds to the vertical excitation geometry. Figure A shows that as we move along
the diagonal, the initially higher lying ME state rapidly becomes
degenerate with the LE states, and then significantly lower in energy.
At the point of degeneracy (an avoided crossing) there is mixing between
the ME and LE diabatic states that leads to a change in character
of the lowest adiabatic excited state (S1): Figure B shows the composition of
the three lowest excited adiabatic states as a function of the normal
mode coordinates demonstrating the change in character of the lowest
adiabatic state as a function of Q.
Figure 3
(A) A slice of the potential
energy surface along the diagonal
of the normal mode coordinate, Q, as each substituted
pentacene monomer in the dimer relaxes along the 1435 cm–1 mode. The values at each point are calculated at the 8o8e level
of theory (see the Supporting Information for details). The ME state is higher than the LE states at Q = (0,0), and the avoided crossing is Q = (0.33,0.33).
(B) Percent diabatic state composition of the three lowest excited
adiabatic states of BP-37 as a function of Q demonstrating
strong mixing at Q = (0.33,0.33) and the change in character
of adiabatic states S1 and S3 as we move from Q = (0,0) to Q = (1.3,1.3). (C) Representation
of the 1435 cm–1 mode in pentacene and the postulated
structure of T1 in a pentacene monomer, achieved through
the avoided crossing.
(A) A slice of the potential
energy surface along the diagonal
of the normal mode coordinate, Q, as each substituted
pentacene monomer in the dimer relaxes along the 1435 cm–1 mode. The values at each point are calculated at the 8o8e level
of theory (see the Supporting Information for details). The ME state is higher than the LE states at Q = (0,0), and the avoided crossing is Q = (0.33,0.33).
(B) Percent diabatic state composition of the three lowest excited
adiabatic states of BP-37 as a function of Q demonstrating
strong mixing at Q = (0.33,0.33) and the change in character
of adiabatic states S1 and S3 as we move from Q = (0,0) to Q = (1.3,1.3). (C) Representation
of the 1435 cm–1 mode in pentacene and the postulated
structure of T1 in a pentacene monomer, achieved through
the avoided crossing.It is clear that despite the overall weak direct-coupling
strength,
strong mixing occurs as the adiabatic states become sufficiently close
in energy. We note that the involvement of a high-frequency mode is
in keeping with the observed ultrafast time scale for iSF. In Figure C, we provide physical
insight into the direct coupling mechanism for iSF, mediated by a
vibrational mode. Starting from a vertical excitation at Q = (0,0), where the bond character shown is deduced from the reported
X-ray structure[15] (Supporting Information), the vibrational mode of a substituted
pentacene monomer points to a structure where the vectors guide the
shortening of the carbon–carbon bonds highlighted in red (double-bond
character in Figure C), concomitant with the elongation of the other bonds. The bond-stretching
and contraction suggests stabilization of a biradical structure with
triplet character localized in the central pentacene ring (animation
of Q available as Supporting Information). This biradical character results in rapid lowering of the ME state
energy, resulting in the near-degeneracy (avoided crossing) necessary
for strong direct mixing of the LE and ME states.[54−58] It must be noted that the structure on the right
is not a minimum energy structure, but one that represents the bond
character along the important mode in iSF. It is clear from the analysis
above that the rate of iSF will be intimately tied to the direct coupling
matrix elements. This coupling can be tuned by the extent of orbital
overlap, in particularly via geometric changes. For instance, as the
monomers rotate around the central bond and approach orthogonality,
we expect coupling to reach a minimum. We consider a rotation of the
dihedral angle from 37° to 57° and find a 2-fold decrease
in the direct coupling matrix element at the avoided crossing region
(∼3 meV vs ∼1.5 meV). Assuming a golden-rule like expression
for the rate of singlet fission where the rate is proportional to
the square of the direct coupling strength,[4] we predict a decrease in the iSF rate by a factor of 4; a key result
that will be compared to the predicted CT-mediated value in the next
section, and confirmed by experimental results below.
Quantifying the
Role of Charge Transfer States
While the identification of
an avoided crossing is essential to
make the direct coupling mechanism viable, this does not in any way
rule out a contribution from the CT-mediated superexchange mechanism.
In this section, we investigate the role of CT states and we quantify
the change in iSF rate associated with the CT-mediated mechanism as
the dihedral angle is varied.As previously mentioned, we find
that accurate quasi-diabatic CT
states cannot be obtained at the 8o8e level of theory. In order to
quantify the extent of CT involvement we move to a reduced, four-orbital/four-electron
(4o4e) active space that includes only the HOMO and LUMO on each pentacene
for BP-37. Table lists
the adiabatic state energies and the corresponding diabatic state
contributions from 4o4e calculations and illustrates the minimal mixing
observed between different “types” of diabatic states.
Table 3
Energies (in eV) and Diabatic Contributions
(in %) of the Eight Lowest Adiabatic Singlet Statesa Calculated at the 4o4e Level of Theory
(adiabatic state)
and energy
gg
tt
ge
eg
gd
dg
ac
ca
(S0) 0.00
88.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
5.6
5.6
0.3
0.3
(S1) 1.53
0.2
98.2
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.8
0.8
(S2) 1.67
0.0
0.0
48.5
48.5
0.3
0.3
1.2
1.2
(S3) 1.69
0.1
0.0
48.9
48.9
1.0
1.0
0.0
0.0
(S4) 1.86
10.6
0.2
1.1
1.1
43.1
43.2
0.4
0.4
(S5) 2.01
0.0
0.0
0.3
0.3
49.7
49.7
0.0
0.0
(S6) 2.81
0.9
1.6
0.0
0.0
0.2
0.2
48.7
48.4
(S7) 2.81
0.0
0.0
1.2
1.2
0.0
0.0
48.7
48.9
See Figure for representation of the diabats.
See Figure for representation of the diabats.The adiabatic states largely correspond to a single
type of diabatic
state, with the exception of S0 and S4, where
the inherent biradical character of BP-37 results in low energy doubly
excited states, dg and gd, mixing
with the gg diabat. In the less accurate 4o4e level
of theory, S1 is largely composed of tt character, while the other states exhibit linear combinations of
similar types of diabats (eg + ge, dg + gd, or ac + ca). This is in agreement with the 8o8e calculations
where we see no CT character in states within ∼1 eV of the
low-lying singlet excited states. We also find that calculations at
the 4o4e level underestimate energies, particularly the ME state,
but are able to reproduce the qualitative picture of high-lying CT
states and very little diabatic mixing.Previous work investigating
the mechanism of xSF unfavorably compared
the direct coupling mechanism against superexchange mediated by high-lying
CT states.[28−33,59] Here, the experimentally observed
0.76 ps iSF time constant in BP-37,[15] the
large energy separation (∼1 eV) of the CT states, and the relatively
small energy separation between the ME and LE states suggest a mechanism
that may be independent of CT mediation. Although the magnitude of
the coupling between the ME/LE states and the CT states in BP-37 is
comparable to values reported for pentacene and tetracene dimers that
undergo xSF,[30,32,33,39,43,60,61] the energetic separation
of the CT states for iSF in BP-37 is significantly larger.[12,31,32,34] This difference is expected since the dimer lacks the HOMO/LUMO
energy bands found in crystallinepentacene, in addition to the longer
intermonomer distance (monomer center-of-mass separated by 13.6 Å
in BP-37 vs 5 Å in crystallinepentacene) that leads to a reduction
in stabilizing Coulomb binding energy.Unlike
the direct coupling mechanism, the CT-mediated mechanism
is second-order in nature, and depends on two factors: the coupling
matrix elements and energy differences between states. The effective
indirect coupling is defined by eq and likewise for the ge diabat.Because CT mediation is an inherently nonlocal phenomenon, it is
expected that CT energies and the indirect coupling may depend strongly
on the intermonomer geometry of the covalently linked pentacene units.
We examine two degrees of freedom that affect the interactions between
the pentacene chromophores: the length of the covalent bond between
the two monomers and the dihedral angle θ. We find that CT state
energies are at a minimum near the reference C–C bond length
of 1.48 Å, and increase only slightly in energy as the σ
bond length decreases (Figure A). Similarly, Figure B shows that the energies of the CT states remain high in
energy and fairly constant relative to the lower lying excited states
as a function of dihedral angle.
Figure 4
Energies of the 4o4e diabatic states as
a function of (A) intermonomer
C–C bond length in BP-37 and (B) the dihedral angle shown in Figure B. (C) CT-mediated
superexchange Veff as defined in the text
as a function of the bipentacene dihedral angle.
Energies of the 4o4e diabatic states as
a function of (A) intermonomer
C–C bond length in BP-37 and (B) the dihedral angle shown in Figure B. (C) CT-mediated
superexchange Veff as defined in the text
as a function of the bipentacene dihedral angle.Although CT states are substantially higher in energy, this
does
not necessarily preclude an efficient CT-mediated mechanism.[30] A better method to establish the role of CT
state mediation is to examine the effective coupling as a function
of chemical structure, and compare the predictions of this mechanism
to the experimentally observed iSF rates. Drawing parallels to our
analysis of the direct mechanism, we show the indirect coupling as
a function of dihedral angle in Figure C. Further, the indirect coupling decreases by a factor
of ∼6 as the dihedral angle changes from 37° to 57°,
while the CT state energies remain roughly constant relative to the
ME and LE sates. Assuming, again, a golden-rule rate expression, this
would predict slower iSF by a factor of ∼36 in contrast to
the factor of 4 predicted by the direct coupling pathway. We note
that, despite the high-level multireference methods used here, we
cannot directly compare the magnitude of coupling for the direct and
CT-mediated mechanisms, rather we rely on trends in coupling to predict
changes in iSF rates. We now turn to experimental evidence to distinguish
between these two different scaling relationships and to identify
the dominant mechanism.
Experimental Results
In order to
experimentally investigate how the excited state dynamics
are affected by modifying interplanar angle between the two substituted
pentacene monomers, we synthesize compounds BP-HPh (θ = 42°)
and BP-2Ph (where θ is analogous to BP-57), where the dihedral
angle twist is imposed by steric hindrance from the R groups shown
in Figure B. Since
the phenyl groups are twisted orthogonal to the pentacene core, they
do not have significant contributions to the electronic structure,
as evidenced in the UV–vis spectrum where their addition does
not shift the onset of absorption (i.e., the phenyl groups do not
participate in delocalization with pentacene). The transient absorption
(TA) spectra (Figure ) of BP-HPh and BP-2Ph show qualitatively similar features to the
parent BP-2H (which is analogous to BP-37), and the iSF rates and
yields can be similarly obtained.[15] The
spectrally deconvoluted singlet and triplet transient features are
evaluated using global analysis methods,[62] and all three exhibit a broad singlet excited state transition that
spectrally overlaps with a narrower triplet absorption feature at
∼520 nm. A triplet absorption feature on the red side of the
ground state bleach is prominent in BP-2H but decreases in intensity
as the molecule becomes more twisted. We have seen a similar effect
in bipentacene molecules with conjugated spacers and believe that
this trend can be attributed to coupling of the T1 →
T triplet transition dipole moments,
oriented along the long axis of the molecule when the pentacenes are
both aligned (planar) and in close proximity.[63]
Figure 5
(A–C)
Raw transient absorption (ΔA) data for dilute
solutions of BP-2H, BP-HPh, and BP-2Ph in chloroform
plotted as a function of wavelength and time. Regions of large pump
scatter at ∼600 nm have been removed for clarity. (D–F)
Corresponding singlet and triplet spectral deconvolution for BP-2H,
BP-HPh, and BP-2Ph, respectively, solved by singular value decomposition
and global analysis.
(A–C)
Raw transient absorption (ΔA) data for dilute
solutions of BP-2H, BP-HPh, and BP-2Ph in chloroform
plotted as a function of wavelength and time. Regions of large pump
scatter at ∼600 nm have been removed for clarity. (D–F)
Corresponding singlet and triplet spectral deconvolution for BP-2H,
BP-HPh, and BP-2Ph, respectively, solved by singular value decomposition
and global analysis.As in BP-2H, we quantify the iSF yield from the ground state
bleach
signal in the deconvoluted spectral transients for the singlet and
triplet.[15,18,64] This method
is valid since the entirety of the molecule is bleached when populated
by one singlet or two triplets.[15,18] We establish that increased
twisting of the molecule does not violate this condition by measuring
each sample under the identical excitation conditions and verifying
that the quantity ΔA/(ε(1 – T)) is conserved for the ground state bleach, where ε
is the extinction coefficient at the absorption maximum and T is the transmission at the pump wavelength. In other words,
the singlet is fully delocalized on the whole molecule.We observe
that the area of the ground state bleach, when corrected
for overlap with induced absorption signals, is unchanged after singlet
fission. Thus, all initially populated states are converted to triplet
pairs and a quantitative iSF yield of ∼200% is observed. This
high yield is consistent with a simple rate analysis, since singlet
fission is orders of magnitude faster than competing deactivation
processes such as the ∼12.3 ns fluorescence decay in TIPS-pentacene
monomer.[64] While qualitatively similar
dynamics are observed in all three compounds, quantitative differences
in the rates of singlet fission and triplet recombination are observed.
In Figure , we show
the TAS kinetics associated with the peak of the triplet absorption
in chloroform at 517, 516 and 528 nm for BP-2H, BP-HPh and BP-2PH,
respectively. It should be noted that there is some overlap with induced
absorption from the singlet state, which gives an instantaneous rise
at time zero. Global fitting of the full data set is used to achieve
high accuracy of the extracted time constants.
Figure 6
Single wavelength transient
absorption kinetics monitoring the
peak in the triplet excited state absorption spectrum in chloroform,
between 0.1 and 0.2 mW and less than 100 μM for all samples.
While both iSF and the corresponding triplet decay rates slow with
increased interplanar angle, there is a larger change in the rate
of triplet decay.
Single wavelength transient
absorption kinetics monitoring the
peak in the triplet excited state absorption spectrum in chloroform,
between 0.1 and 0.2 mW and less than 100 μM for all samples.
While both iSF and the corresponding triplet decay rates slow with
increased interplanar angle, there is a larger change in the rate
of triplet decay.The ultrafast time constant
for iSF monotonically increases as
the dihedral angle increases, from 0.76 ps to 1.69 ps to 3.38 ps.
The iSF rate constant changes from BP-2H (least twisted) to BP-2Ph
(most twisted) by a factor of ∼4.5, very close to the factor
of 4 predicted by the direct coupling mechanism comparing BP-37 to
BP-57, and an order of magnitude different from the slow-down in rate
predicted by the CT-mediated superexchange mechanism. We note that
the rate of triplet recombination is similarly affected, with the
time constant monotonically increasing from 450 ps to 1600 ps to 5200
ps, as the dimer becomes more twisted. We find that the change in
electronic coupling strength for the recombination of two triplets
appears to be more dramatic than for iSF, with recombination rates
scaling even more strongly than iSF rates with the twist-induced reduction
in coupling. Since fast iSF but slow triplet recombination are desired,
this observation suggests a viable way to optimize the overall excited
state lifetime, an important result for technological applications.
Effect
of Solvent Properties on iSF Rates
Finally, using both theory
and experiments, we establish that solvent
properties do not significantly and systematically change the rate
of iSF, suggesting that iSF proceeds primarily through a direct coupling
mechanism in the bipentacenes studied here. We calculate diabatic
excited state energies in solution by employing the polarizable continuum
model (PCM) to simulate solvent effects.[48,65] Even for solvents as polar as water, we observe only a minimal 50
meV shift in CT state energies relative to all other states (further
details provided in the Supporting Information). Experimental studies reveal a weak and complex dependence of the
electronic energy levels on the properties (in particular orientation
polarizability) of the solvent, consistent with the idea that direct
coupling mediates iSF and CT states are not necessarily involved.
While small changes in the energy of the S0 → S1, S1 → SN, and T1 →
T3 transitions are observed, there is a nonmonotonic dependence
on the solvent dielectric constant, index of refraction, or orientation
polarizability (Supporting Information).
The singlet fission rate constants change by less than a factor of
2 over the entire range of solvents used (including hexane, xylenes,
chloroform, THF, acetone), which is consistent with a dominant mechanism
that does not involve CT states to mediate iSF. We note that other
pentacene dimers with a markedly different connectivity were recently
shown to exhibit weakly solvent-dependent iSF dynamics.[17,18] That result suggests that molecules with varying degrees of conjugation
and through-space interactions may adopt intramolecular conformations
capable of accessing lower lying CT states.In summary, we find
a novel mechanism for ultrafast iSF in pentacene
dimers: direct coupling of the singlet to multiexciton state facilitated
by vibronic coupling induced degeneracy. Furthermore, we rule out
dominant contributions of a CT-mediated mechanism, unlike in the case
of xSF. Experimental characterization of iSF rates of molecules with
different dihedral angles confirms that the direct coupling mechanism
accurately reproduces measured trends and further raises the interesting
point that slowing the rate of iSF in highly twisted dimers is accompanied
by dramatically slower rates of triplet pair recombination. Establishing
the mechanism for iSF in these materials is the first step toward
designing new materials with optimized excited state properties for
high efficiency organic solar cells.
Experimental Section
Calculations
All geometry optimizations described in
the manuscript are performed using DFT-B3LYP with a 6-31G* basis set.
Following earlier work on xSF in pentacene,[32] excited state energies for the dimer are obtained from multiconfiguration
quasi-degenerate perturbation theory (XMCQDPT) calculations[42] with a 0.02 au intruder state avoidance shift[49] using the SBKJC pseudopotential with its corresponding
double-ζ basis set[66]plus a d-polarization
function taken from the standard 6-31G* basis set for carbon.[67] We find that an 8o8e active space is necessary
to yield accurate excited state energies for the dimer, a conclusion
similarly reached for related acene dimers.[17,43,44] Diabatization of the eight (four) lowest
lying states is performed at the 4o4e (8o8e) level employing the 4-fold
approach of Nakamura and Truhlar to obtain our diabatic states.[68,69] Reference orbitals are generated from a Hartree–Fock calculation
at large intermonomer distances which allows for each orbital to be
unambiguously associated with only one monomer. To investigate the
effects of solvent polarity, diabatization calculations utilizing
the polarizable continuum model (PCM) are performed at the CASSCF
level using a minimal active space so as to explicitly construct charge
transfer diabats.[48,65] A state specific shift, defined
as E(XMCQDPT) – E(CASSCF) in vacuo, is applied to the resulting energies to account
for the absent dynamical correlation. All calculations are performed
using the electronic structure package GAMESS-US.[70,71]
Transient Absorption Spectroscopy
Transient absorption
spectroscopy was performed using a commercial Ti:sapphire laser system
(SpectraPhysics) operating at a repetition rate of 1 kHz. A commercial
optical parametric amplifier (LightConversion) was used to generate
resonant pump pulses with ∼100 fs time duration. Supercontinuum
probe light was generated by focusing a small portion of the 800 nm
fundamental into a sapphire disk. The probe light was split into signal
and reference beams, which were detected on a shot-by-shot basis by
a fiber-coupled silicon (visible) or InGaAs (infrared) diode array.
The pump–probe delay was controlled by a mechanical delay stage.
Excitation fluence in each measurement was approximately 50 μJ/cm2. Method details and results for additional ultrafast experiments,
including triplet photosensitization and photoluminescence upconversion
measurements, can be found in the Supporting Information.
Authors: Erik Busby; Jianlong Xia; Qin Wu; Jonathan Z Low; Rui Song; John R Miller; X-Y Zhu; Luis M Campos; Matthew Y Sfeir Journal: Nat Mater Date: 2015-01-12 Impact factor: 43.841
Authors: Wai-Lun Chan; Timothy C Berkelbach; Makenzie R Provorse; Nicholas R Monahan; John R Tritsch; Mark S Hybertsen; David R Reichman; Jiali Gao; X-Y Zhu Journal: Acc Chem Res Date: 2013-04-12 Impact factor: 22.384
Authors: Shane R Yost; Jiye Lee; Mark W B Wilson; Tony Wu; David P McMahon; Rebecca R Parkhurst; Nicholas J Thompson; Daniel N Congreve; Akshay Rao; Kerr Johnson; Matthew Y Sfeir; Moungi G Bawendi; Timothy M Swager; Richard H Friend; Marc A Baldo; Troy Van Voorhis Journal: Nat Chem Date: 2014-05-04 Impact factor: 24.427
Authors: Samuel N Sanders; Elango Kumarasamy; Andrew B Pun; Michael L Steigerwald; Matthew Y Sfeir; Luis M Campos Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2016-02-02 Impact factor: 15.336
Authors: Irvinder Kaur; Wenling Jia; Ryan P Kopreski; Selvapraba Selvarasah; Mehmet R Dokmeci; Chandrani Pramanik; Nicol E McGruer; Glen P Miller Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2008-12-03 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Hannah L Stern; Alexandre Cheminal; Shane R Yost; Katharina Broch; Sam L Bayliss; Kai Chen; Maxim Tabachnyk; Karl Thorley; Neil Greenham; Justin M Hodgkiss; John Anthony; Martin Head-Gordon; Andrew J Musser; Akshay Rao; Richard H Friend Journal: Nat Chem Date: 2017-09-11 Impact factor: 24.427
Authors: Steven Lukman; Kai Chen; Justin M Hodgkiss; David H P Turban; Nicholas D M Hine; Shaoqiang Dong; Jishan Wu; Neil C Greenham; Andrew J Musser Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2016-12-07 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: M Tuan Trinh; Andrew Pinkard; Andrew B Pun; Samuel N Sanders; Elango Kumarasamy; Matthew Y Sfeir; Luis M Campos; Xavier Roy; X-Y Zhu Journal: Sci Adv Date: 2017-07-14 Impact factor: 14.136
Authors: K Broch; J Dieterle; F Branchi; N J Hestand; Y Olivier; H Tamura; C Cruz; V M Nichols; A Hinderhofer; D Beljonne; F C Spano; G Cerullo; C J Bardeen; F Schreiber Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2018-03-05 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: Florian A Y N Schröder; David H P Turban; Andrew J Musser; Nicholas D M Hine; Alex W Chin Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2019-03-05 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: Bettina S Basel; Johannes Zirzlmeier; Constantin Hetzer; Brian T Phelan; Matthew D Krzyaniak; S Rajagopala Reddy; Pedro B Coto; Noah E Horwitz; Ryan M Young; Fraser J White; Frank Hampel; Timothy Clark; Michael Thoss; Rik R Tykwinski; Michael R Wasielewski; Dirk M Guldi Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2017-05-18 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: Bettina S Basel; Ryan M Young; Matthew D Krzyaniak; Ilias Papadopoulos; Constantin Hetzer; Yueze Gao; Nathan T La Porte; Brian T Phelan; Timothy Clark; Rik R Tykwinski; Michael R Wasielewski; Dirk M Guldi Journal: Chem Sci Date: 2019-10-21 Impact factor: 9.825