Christopher J Chang1. 1. Departments of Chemistry and Molecular and Cell Biology, the Howard Hughes Medical Institute, and the Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, Chemical Sciences Division, University of California , Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
Having just
returned from a thoroughly enjoyable visit to Churchill Downs to watch
the Kentucky Derby, I’m reminded of the optimism and interest
every year at the prospects of the winning horse going on to take
the Triple Crown. We gravitate to seeing patterns in threes, from
book and movie trilogies to sets of lucky or unlucky occurrences to
the dreaded third reviewer. You can even look it up on Wikipedia,
where the so-called “rule of three” is “a writing
principle that suggests that things that come in threes are funnier,
more satisfying, or more effective than other numbers of things (or omne trium perfectum if you are more fluent in Latin than
I am).[1]On the heels of our recent Outlook from Steve Ley’s laboratory
on new enabling technologies for synthesis,[2] particularly flow chemistry, this month’s issue of ACS Central Science features its own Triple Crown of Outlooks
centered on three forward-looking challenges and opportunities in
synthesis from the view of sustainability: C–H functionalization,
photocatalysis, and electrosynthesis. There is no doubt that we as
a community have barely scratched the surface of chemical space and
what is possible to make, but it is just as important that we push
ourselves to pay attention to the limited elemental resources we have
on our planet and make the molecules and materials we want and need
for society in the most efficient, sustainable, and energy-conscious
manner possible.Against this backdrop, Hartwig and Larsen summarize
recent advances and future prospects in C–H functionalization.[3] Many times referred to by my more synthetic colleagues
as the “unfunctional” group, hydrocarbons represent
our most abundant source of organic feedstocks, and the selective
transformation of C–H bonds to other functionalities offers
a direct way to upgrade those feedstocks in a single step. Metal-based
catalysis, particularly the use of coordination chemistry to achieve
directed C–H functionalization, has been met with most success,
but a growing set of traceless or even undirected C–H functionalizations
promises to uncover new strategies for molecule construction. The
other two Outlooks feature methods for synthesis that focus on sustainable
energy input. Levin, Kim, and Toste write on the use of photoredox
catalysis for transition metal mediated cross-coupling reactions,
where solar energy can be harnessed to create flexible odd-electron
intermediates from excited-state reagents that are both stronger oxidants
and reductants than their ground-state counterparts.[4] The authors draw parallels from odd-electron organometallic
reagents to provide a set of design principles for activating two-electron
chemistry from elementary single-electron transfers. Finally, Horn,
Rosen, and Baran outline electrochemistry as another emerging area
for sustainable synthesis with a long and storied history that in
the current age offers new opportunities to forego harsh, toxic, and
often unselective reagents and replace them with electrodes that can
achieve a highly specific and programmable redox bias.[5] The authors highlight the utility of this synthetic approach
in the context of synthesis of complex molecular architectures. Both photochemistry and electrochemistry offer approaches
that are highly scalable, environmentally friendly, and tolerant of
many functional groups.We hope that you agree that these papers
provide three keen visions for the continued growth in bond-making
and bond-breaking reactions at carbon with sustainable feedstocks
and reagents, each providing unique insight and guidance to their
further advances in development and practice. We are eager to continue
to provide these multipronged sets of Outlooks as a service to the
community, so let us know if you have a good idea or three.