| Literature DB >> 27279903 |
Till Wüstemann1, Ulrike Bauder-Wüst2, Martin Schäfer2, Matthias Eder2, Martina Benesova2, Karin Leotta1, Clemens Kratochwil1, Uwe Haberkorn3, Klaus Kopka4, Walter Mier1.
Abstract
Despite the progress in diagnosis and treatment, prostate cancer (PCa) is one of the main causes for cancer-associated deaths among men. Recently, prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) binding tracers have revolutionized the molecular imaging of this disease. The translation of these tracers into therapeutic applications is challenging because of high PSMA-associated kidney uptake. While both the tumor uptake and the uptake in the kidneys are PSMA-specific, the kidneys show a more rapid clearance than tumor lesions. Consequently, the potential of endoradiotherapeutic drugs targeting PSMA is highly dependent on a sustained retention in the tumor - ideally achieved by predominant internalization of the respective tracer. Previously, we were able to show that the pharmacokinetics of the tracers containing the Glu-urea-based binding motif can be further enhanced with a specifically designed linker. Here, we evaluate an eventual influence of the chelator moiety on the pharmacokinetics, including the tumor internalization. A series of tracers modified by different chelators were synthesized using solid phase chemistry. The conjugates were radiolabeled to evaluate the influence on the receptor binding affinity, the ligand-induced internalization and the biodistribution behavior. Competitive binding and internalization assays were performed on PSMA positive LNCaP cells and the biodistribution of the most promising compound was evaluated by positron emission tomography (PET) in LNCaP-tumor-bearing mice. Interestingly, conjugation of the different chelators did not cause significant differences: all compounds showed nanomolar binding affinities with only minor differences. PET imaging of the (68)Ga-labeled CHX-A''-DTPA conjugate revealed that the chelator moiety does not impair the specificity of tumor uptake when compared to the gold standard PSMA-617. However, strong differences of the internalization ratios caused by the chelator moiety were observed: differences in internalization between 15% and 65% were observed, with the CHX-A''-DTPA conjugate displaying the highest internalization ratio. A first-in-man PET/CT study proved the high tumor uptake of this (68)Ga-labeled PSMA-targeting compound. These data indicate that hydrophobic entities at the chelator mediate the internalization efficacy. Based on its specific tumor uptake in combination with its very high internalization ratio, the clinical performance of the chelator-conjugated Glu-urea-based PSMA inhibitors will be further elucidated.Entities:
Keywords: PSMA; chelators; positron emission tomography; prostate cancer; prostate-specific membrane antigen; theranostics; tumor targeting
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27279903 PMCID: PMC4893637 DOI: 10.7150/thno.13448
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Theranostics ISSN: 1838-7640 Impact factor: 11.556
Figure 1Chemical structures of the binding motif (framed) and the chelator moieties used to study the effect of the distant building block in the PSMA binding conjugates.
Specifications of the reaction conditions applied in the conjugation high yields of the final compound. All reactions were carried out for 16 h. For the coupling of NODAGA triethylamine (TEA) was used instead of DIPEA.
| DOTA | NOTA | DTPA | CHX-A''-DPTA | PCTA | Oxo-DO3A | NODAGA | CIM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DOTA- | NOTA-difluor-phenol ester | DTPA-tetra | CHX-A''-DTPA isothio-cyanate | PCTA-isothio-cyanate | Oxo-DO3A isothio-cyanate | NODAGA isothio-cyanate | CIM | |
| 4 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | |
| 20 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 16 | 16 | 10 (TEA) | 10 | |
| - | - | 1.96 | - | - | - | - | 1.90 | |
| 10-40% ACN | 10-40% ACN | 10-40% ACN | 20-50% ACN | 15-45% ACN | 15-45% ACN | 15-45% ACN | 25-55% ACN |
Figure 2 A In vitro IC50 values of
Figure 3MicroPET comparison of the 68Ga-labeled CHX-A''-DTPA conjugate A and the 68Ga-labeled DOTA conjugate B in the same mouse. Both MIPs were recorded 2 h post injection. C MicroPET image (MIP) of the 68Ga-labeled CHX-A''-DTPA conjugate blocked with 100-fold excess of the non-labeled compound 2 h post injection. D Tumor uptake dynamics of the first 60 minutes post injection of the 68Ga-labeled conjugates coupled to DOTA and CHX-A''-DTPA.
Figure 4PET/CT scans (MIP) with the 68Ga-labeled PSMA binding conjugates containing the chelator HBED-CC and CHX-A''-DTPA. The arrows indicate reference lesions for further evaluation (see table 2)
Figure 5A Comparison of ratio of internalization and IC50 values of each compound. The compound coupled to CHX-A''-DTPA performed best in both assays and may therefore be a promising new compound. B Comparison of internalization ratio and retention time. The linear fit represents the correlation of internalization with increasing hydrophobicity (Pearson R value = 0.60). C Suggested model of action of the CHX-A''-DTPA-coupled ligand at the PSMA receptor. While the urea-based binding motif and the linker region seem to play primarily a crucial role in targeting the tumor, the chelating entity may have an essential part by enhancing internalization of the compound.
Maximum SUV determined using organ-volume of interest (VOI) analysis
| SUV max (organ-VOI) | HBED-CC 1 h | CHX-DTPA 1 h | CHX-DTPA 3 h | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bone metastases (sternum) | 6.6 | 6.1 | 7 | |
| Liver | 3.1 | 6.1 | 6 | |
| Spleen | 8.2 | 16.3 | 16.2 | |
| Blader/urin | 74 | 4.7 | 3.7 | |
| Blood-pool | 1.1 | 1.9 | 1.8 |