| Literature DB >> 27279835 |
Yuan Hu1, Xin Zhou1, Dai-Hong Guo1, Ping Liu1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Diabetes is a metabolic disorder caused by oxidative stress and inflammation. JianYuTangKang (JYTK), as a potential Chinese integrative medicine, is an antioxidant used in Chinese medicine with potential anti-inflammatory properties.Entities:
Keywords: Antioxidant Status; Chinese Integrative Medicine; Inflammation; JYTK; Type 2 Diabetes
Year: 2016 PMID: 27279835 PMCID: PMC4895123 DOI: 10.5812/ijem.34400
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Endocrinol Metab ISSN: 1726-913X
Figure 1.Consolidated Standards of Reporting Randomized Clinical Trials (2010) Flow Chart for Tracking Participants in the Randomized Controlled Trial
ITT, intention to-treat.
Baseline Clinical Characteristics and Laboratory Measures of the Subjects With T2DM[a,b]
| Characteristics | Control Group Metformin+ Placebo (n = 53) | Treatment Group Metformin+ JYTK (n = 59)[ |
|---|---|---|
|
| 56.3 ± 11.1 | 54.9 ± 10.3 |
|
| 59 (57.6) | 53 (51.0) |
|
| 26.6 ± 6.9 | 28.6 ± 4.8 |
|
| 8.1 ± 2.5 | 8.4 ± 1.9 |
|
| 7.2 ± 1.0 | 7.3 ± 1.1 |
|
| 5.1 ± 1.0 | 4.9 ± 0.9 |
|
| 1.7 ± 1.1 | 1.8 ± 1.0 |
|
| 1.4 ± 0.4 | 1.3 ± 0.4 |
|
| 3.0 ± 0.8 | 2.9 ± 0.8 |
|
| 147.8 ± 17.4 | 140.7 ± 14.5 |
|
| 6.5 ± 1.7 | 6.4 ± 1.5 |
|
| 0.6 ± 0.08 | 0.6 ± 0.05 |
|
| 10.4 ± 6.8 | 11.0 ± 7.2 |
|
| 147.8 ± 17.4 | 140.7 ± 14.5 |
|
| 68.6 ± 18.9 | 64.6 ± 17.8 |
|
| 306.2 ± 91.2 | 299.9 ± 90.7 |
|
| 10.2 ± 6.8 | 9.5 ± 5.7 |
Abbreviations: ACR, urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio; BMI, body mass index; Cr, creatinine; ESR, sedimentation rate; FPG, fasting plasma glucose; HbA1c, glycated hemoglobin; Hb, hemoglobin; HDL-C, high density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C, low density lipoprotein-cholesterol; NEU, polymorphonuclear; TC, total cholesterol; TG, triglyceride; WBC, white blood cell; UA, urea nitrogen.
aValues are expressed as mean ± SD or No. (%).
bNo significant difference was detected between the groups using the sample t-test and χ2 test in all items.
cP > 0.05 vs. control group.
Serum Oxidative Stress and Inflammation Parameters in the Subjects With T2DM at Baseline and After JYTK Treatment[a]
| Groups | Baseline | 9 Weeks | 18 Weeks | 26 Weeks | Variable Change 95% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||
| treatment group | 39.2 ± 14.9 | 37.6 ± 16.6 | 33.1 ± 15.5[ | 31.2 ± 10.5[ | -8.0 (-12.7, -3.3) |
| control group | 37.7 ± 19.8 | 37.2 ± 16.7 | 35.5 ± 14.6 | 36.4 ± 11.5 | -1.3 (-7.5, 4.9) |
|
| |||||
| treatment group | 23.6 ± 10.8 | 20.1 ± 11.4 | 18.3 ± 10.9[ | 17.5 ± 11.3[ | -6.1 (-10.1, -2.1) |
| control group | 24.2 ± 12.4 | 22.9 ± 13.5 | 21.7 ± 14.1 | 22.5 ± 12.9 | -1.7 (-6.6, 3.2) |
|
| |||||
| treatment group | 0.13 ± 0.09 | 0.12 ± 0.11 | 0.11 ± 0.10 | 0.10 ± 0.09 | -0.03 (-0.06, 0.00) |
| control group | 0.14 ± 0.08 | 0.13 ± 0.09 | 0.13 ± 0.08 | 0.14 ± 0.07 | 0.0 (-0.03, 0.03) |
|
| |||||
| treatment group | 2.4 ± 0.7 | 2.2 ± 0.9 | 2.1 ± 0.9 | 1.9 ± 0.9[ | -0.5 (-0.8, -0.2) |
| control group | 2.2 ± 0.8 | 2.1 ± 0.7 | 2.0 ± 0.8 | 2.2 ± 0.6 | 0.0 (-0.3, 0.3) |
|
| |||||
| treatment group | 85.1 ± 25.6 | 86.5 ± 26.7 | 90.6 ± 27.3 | 98.1 ± 30.4[ | 13 (2.8, 23.3) |
| control group | 79.3 ± 27.9 | 80.1 ± 29.8 | 83.8 ± 28.4 | 78.5 ± 29.3 | -0.8 (-11.8, 10.2) |
|
| |||||
| treatment group | 221.6 ± 139.9 | 225.8 ± 114.2 | 250.2 ± 101.3 | 252.7 ± 105.9 | 31.1 (-14.2, 76.4) |
| control group | 198.6 ± 115.7 | 201.5 ± 103.5 | 190.6 ± 107.8 | 205.1 ± 110.4 | 6.5 (-37.1, 50.1) |
Abbreviations: GPX, glutathione peroxidase, hs-CRP, high sensitivity C-reactive protein; IL-6, interleukin 6; MDA, malondialdehyde; SOD, superoxide dismutase; TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor-α.
aValues are expressed as mean ± SD.
bP < 0.05.
cP < 0.01 vs. mean pre-treatment mean value (the Dunnett test).
dVariable change 95% CI, from baseline to week 26 within-group change, determined and considered as statistically significant for values other than zero.
Figure 2.Serum TNF-α, IL-6, MDA, and SOD Levels of Patients With T2DM at Baseline Through 26 Weeks of Treatment With JYTK/Metformin or Metformin Only
Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was used to identify differences between the two groups after intervention. * P < 0.05 vs. controls at the same time point.