Literature DB >> 27278816

SinEx DB: a database for single exon coding sequences in mammalian genomes.

Roddy Jorquera1, Rodrigo Ortiz1, F Ossandon1, Juan Pablo Cárdenas1, Rene Sepúlveda1, Carolina González1, David S Holmes2.   

Abstract

Eukaryotic genes are typically interrupted by intragenic, noncoding sequences termed introns. However, some genes lack introns in their coding sequence (CDS) and are generally known as 'single exon genes' (SEGs). In this work, a SEG is defined as a nuclear, protein-coding gene that lacks introns in its CDS. Whereas, many public databases of Eukaryotic multi-exon genes are available, there are only two specialized databases for SEGs. The present work addresses the need for a more extensive and diverse database by creating SinEx DB, a publicly available, searchable database of predicted SEGs from 10 completely sequenced mammalian genomes including human. SinEx DB houses the DNA and protein sequence information of these SEGs and includes their functional predictions (KOG) and the relative distribution of these functions within species. The information is stored in a relational database built with My SQL Server 5.1.33 and the complete dataset of SEG sequences and their functional predictions are available for downloading. SinEx DB can be interrogated by: (i) a browsable phylogenetic schema, (ii) carrying out BLAST searches to the in-house SinEx DB of SEGs and (iii) via an advanced search mode in which the database can be searched by key words and any combination of searches by species and predicted functions. SinEx DB provides a rich source of information for advancing our understanding of the evolution and function of SEGs.Database URL: www.sinex.cl.
© The Author(s) 2016. Published by Oxford University Press.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27278816      PMCID: PMC4897596          DOI: 10.1093/database/baw095

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Database (Oxford)        ISSN: 1758-0463            Impact factor:   3.451


Introduction

In most Eukaryotic genes, the coding sequence (CDS) is interrupted by noncoding introns that are removed by splicing to generate mRNA. However, some single exon coding genes, also termed single exon genes (SEGs), have been identified. Although some SEGs are thought to be processed pseudo-genes, many have been demonstrated to be expressed (1–3), raising questions as to their origin, evolution and function. Among the well characterized SEGs, with experimentally verified functions, are multiple genes encoding histones (4), G protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) (5–7), olfactory receptors (8), transcription factors and proteins involved in the regulation of development, growth and proliferation (9). There is evidence that SEGs tend to be expressed in a tissue specific manner. For example, it has been proposed that the expression of a large proportion of human SEGs is testis and neuro-specific and associated with several types of cancer, neurological and developmental disorders (9). Investigations into the origin and evolution of SEGs within the Eukaryote domain suggest that many SEGs have arisen from multi-exon genes via retrotransposition (8, 10) and databases of predicted retrotransposed genes, including SEGs, have been constructed (11, 12). Other molecular mechanisms for the origin of SEGs have been proposed such as de novo origin (13), DNA-based duplication from intron-containing genes (14), and intron loss, among others (15, 16). It has also been suggested that SEGs evolve significantly faster than intron-containing genes (17). Whereas a large number of searchable databases for intron containing genes are available, e.g. (18, 19), there are only two publicly available databases for SEGs. These are IGD, housing a collection of human intronless genes (20) and PIGD, a SEGs database from five plants (21). A database of SEGs from five Eukaryotic genomes published a decade ago is no longer available (22). Herein, we extend and complement the IGD and PIGD databases by creating SinEx DB, a publicly available searchable database of predicted SEGs from 10 completely sequenced mammalian genomes, namely: human, chimpanzee, rhesus macaque, mouse, rat, dog, horse, pig, cow and opossum. SEGs deposited in the SinEx DB include examples that are predicted to have arisen by mechanisms other than retrotransposition and, therefore, SinEx DB extends the information available in Retrogene DB (11). In SinEx DB, a SEG is defined as a nuclear (nonmitochondrial), protein-coding gene that lacks introns in its CDS. The definition excludes genes that generate functional RNAs such as tRNA, rRNA and regulatory RNAs. It also excludes potential genes that do not contain the ‘CDS FEATURE’ convention in their annotation. An additional consideration is that SEGs could still contain introns in their 5′ and/or 3′-untranslated region (UTR). SEGs, annotated as ‘pseudogenes’ were binned separately and were not included in this first version of SinEx DB. It is anticipated that SinEx DB will prove a useful resource for addressing questions regarding the occurrence, genomic and functional distribution of SEGs on a large comparative genome scale.

Database construction

The sequences of annotated mammalian genomes, assembled at a chromosome level, were downloaded from GenBank (23) at the FTP site on the NCBI web page (ftp://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genomes/), including: human (ref_GRCh37.p5), chimpanzee (ref_Pan_troglodytes-2.1.4), rhesus macaque (ref_Mmul_051212), mouse (ref_MGSCv37), rat (ref_RGSC_v3.4), dog (ref_CanFam2.0), horse (ref_EquCab2.0), pig (ref_Sscrofa10), cow (ref_Btau_4.2) and opossum (ref_MonDom5). Using Perl scripts and BioPerl Application Programming Interface (API) (24), CDS gene identifiers in the Genbank-format chromosome files corresponding to amino acid CDSs, were selected according to their location coordinates and classified into two groups, namely: those that contained only 1 pair of start and end, e.g. ‘1.30’ (SEGs) and those that contain multiple pairs of start and end coordinates, e.g. ‘join(1.30,50.109 121.150)’ (multi-exon genes or MEGs). MEGs were binned and stored separately and can be downloaded from SinEx DB. Additionally, all CDS containing the ‘/pseudo’ tag (annotated as inactive pseudogenes) were binned and stored separately (Supplementary Table S1). Genes from mitochondrial genomes were not included in the database generation. High dimensional analysis of the SEG information includes their distribution within genomes and prediction of their function. Sequences were categorized using KOG (25) and RPS-BLAST (26), implemented in an in-house platform developed in Perl. The information was stored in a relational database built with My SQL Server 5.1.33 (Figure 1).
Figure 1.

Bioinformatic pipeline outlining the strategy for SinEx DB construction. Ten sequenced mammalian genomes (see text for list) were downloaded from the FTP site in the NCBI web page (ftp://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genomes/). Nucleotide sequences were translated in silico to corresponding amino acids. Using Perl scripts and BioPerl Application Programming Interface (API) genes were parsed into single exon (SEGs) and multi-exon genes (MEGs). MEGs and annotated pseudogenes were binned and stored separately.

Bioinformatic pipeline outlining the strategy for SinEx DB construction. Ten sequenced mammalian genomes (see text for list) were downloaded from the FTP site in the NCBI web page (ftp://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genomes/). Nucleotide sequences were translated in silico to corresponding amino acids. Using Perl scripts and BioPerl Application Programming Interface (API) genes were parsed into single exon (SEGs) and multi-exon genes (MEGs). MEGs and annotated pseudogenes were binned and stored separately. The quality of the genome sequence and annotation will influence the prediction of single-exon coding sequences. In order to minimize this problem, SinEx DB is constructed using only completely sequenced and annotated mammalian genomes, assembled at a chromosome level.

Data content

SinEx DB provides information regarding the occurrence, properties and genomic distribution of 31 624 SEGs out of a total of 248 152 annotated CDSs from 10 completely sequenced mammalian genomes. SEGs annotated as pseudogenes in the NCBI database were binned separately (Supplementary Table S1) and are not included in SinEx DB. Thus, SinEx DB complements the database of eukaryotic pseudogenes available at pseudogene.org (27). The average percentage of SEGs to total protein encoding genes within the 10 mammalian genomes is 12.9%, with no statistically significant difference between genomes (SD = ±3.05). The occurrence of SEGs ranges from 8.9% in human (Homo sapiens) to 17.3% in rat (Rattus norvegicus) (Table 1). The percentage of predicted SEGs in the human genome is lower than the 12.3% previously reported in 2004 (28), probably due to recent improvements in the annotation of the human genome.
Table 1.

Occurrence of total annotated CDS by NCBI, gene density [gene/genome size (Mb)] and predicted single exon genes in mammals using in-house Perl script.

SpeciesNameTotal CDSSEG numberΔSEG percentageAv. SEG lengthaGenome size (Mb)bGene numberbGene density (gene/Mb)Total gene number with 5′ and/or 3′-UTRsc
Homo sapiensHuman35 19531288.93412670.4227 15510.221 838
Pan troglodytesChimpanzee33 726352210.43062528.4524 4409.720 583
Macaca mulattaMacaque29 288471316.12201412.4728 77020.417 376
Mus musculusMouse28 789485816.93022474.9322 9009.325 553
Rattus norvegicusRat19 402335517.32973095.6937 15012.018 679
Canis lupus familiarisDog21 894239210.93053600.521 5836.01161
Equus caballusHorse20 21019539.73283097.5929 4139.57567
Sus scrofaPig22 663270311.93022654.9134 29312.95277
Bos taurusCow18 577255113.72863160.3730 2359.618 039
Monodelphis domesticaOpossum18 410244913.33302725.9929 10010.71329

Percentage of predicted SEGs (Δ) as a function of total annotated CDS per genome.

Average CDS length of SEGs in amino acids.

Obtained from NCBI web page (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genome/).

cObtained from UTRdb web page (http://utrdb.ba.itb.cnr.it/home/statistics).

Occurrence of total annotated CDS by NCBI, gene density [gene/genome size (Mb)] and predicted single exon genes in mammals using in-house Perl script. Percentage of predicted SEGs (Δ) as a function of total annotated CDS per genome. Average CDS length of SEGs in amino acids. Obtained from NCBI web page (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genome/). cObtained from UTRdb web page (http://utrdb.ba.itb.cnr.it/home/statistics). The average potential coding capacity of the SEGs is 302 amino acids and ranges from 220 in Rhesus macaque (Macaca mulatta) to 341 in human (Homo sapiens), with no statistically significant difference between genomes (SD = ±33) (Table 1). There is no statistical correlation between the number of total genes with 5′- and/or 3′-untranslated regions (UTRs) (29) and SEG percentage (R2 = 0.5009) among the analyzed mammalian genomes (Supplementary Figure S1).

Web interface

There are three ways to access SinEx DB data via the web interface (Figure 2): (i) through the browsable phylogenetic schema, in which the user can obtain KOG functional categories for SEGs, can access their predicted protein sequences and perform external searches, (ii) by interrogating a protein sequence as a query in BLASTP against the in-house SinEx DB and (iii) by performing an advanced search using ‘genome’, ‘protein name’, ‘protein ID’, ‘chromosome number’, ‘gene symbol’, or by ‘KOG category’ or combinations of the above to search the in-house SinEx DB. The search by protein name is not case sensitive but is sensitive to different spelling. Hot-links to NCBI sequence accession entries were included for all sequences within the SinEx DB web interface.
Figure 2.

Screen shot of the web interface of SinEx DB. There are three ways to access SinEx DB data: (i) by exploring the database content through the browsable phylogenetic schema, (ii) using a protein sequence in FASTA format as a query against SinEx DB and (iii) doing an advanced search to interrogate one or more genomes (see text for more details). Nucleotide and protein sequences of SEGs and protein sequences of MEGs from 10 mammalian genomes are downloadable in FASTA format. A tutorial is also available in the webpage (www.sinex.cl/tutorial.app).

Screen shot of the web interface of SinEx DB. There are three ways to access SinEx DB data: (i) by exploring the database content through the browsable phylogenetic schema, (ii) using a protein sequence in FASTA format as a query against SinEx DB and (iii) doing an advanced search to interrogate one or more genomes (see text for more details). Nucleotide and protein sequences of SEGs and protein sequences of MEGs from 10 mammalian genomes are downloadable in FASTA format. A tutorial is also available in the webpage (www.sinex.cl/tutorial.app). Nucleotide and protein sequences of SEGs and protein sequences of MEGs from 10 mammalian genomes included in SinEx DB are downloadable in FASTA format. A section of statistical information of occurrence and functional classification of SEGs in mammalian genomes and a tutorial to facilitate user’s recovery of data are also available in the webpage (www.sinex.cl/tutorial.app).

Utility

SinEx DB can be used for investigating the function of SEGs, both within a specific genome and across multiple genomes and can facilitate other aspects of comparative genomics. It could also be useful for generating models of SEGs evolution, including the timing of appearance or disappearance of SEGs across the phylogenetic tree. Example of the use of SinEx DB: comparative analysis of SEG functions in mammals. Functional predictions of SEGs have been reported for the human (6, 8, 20, 30) and mouse (2) genomes. However a large scale multiple-genome comparison of predicted SEG functions has not been carried out. In order to address this issue, SEGs and MEGs derived from the SinEx DB were binned into 25 functional categories using the KOG classifier (25). Subsequently, the ratio of SEGs to MEGs in each functional category of each genome was calculated in order to determine if any KOG functional category was enriched in SEGs. To evaluate the statistical significance of the results, the natural logarithm of the ratio of SEGs to MEGs [Ln (SEG/MEG)] was obtained and the average and standard deviation of Ln (SEG/MEG) within each species were used to calculate Z-scores and to normalize data (Figure 3). P values using the Pearson’s chi-squared test was calculated and corrected with the Sidak method for multiple comparisons (31). The higher the z-score, the more distant it is from the population mean.
Figure 3.

SEG/MEG proportion in different KOG functional categories for mammals, represented as a combined z-score from multiple tests (mammals). A high dimensional analysis of all categorized sequences from SinEx DB shows that, in mammals, CDSs with predicted functions related to chromatin structure (B), signal transduction mechanisms (T) and translation (J) are enriched in SEGs (high proportion of SEGs to MEGs), whereas CDSs with predicted functions related to envelope biogenesis, amino acid, nucleotide, secondary metabolites and lipid metabolism have the lowest SEGs to MEGs proportion. The P value was obtained using the Pearson’s chi-squared test and corrected by Sidak multiple testing method (31). Asterisk indicates statistical significance, P < 0.05.

SEG/MEG proportion in different KOG functional categories for mammals, represented as a combined z-score from multiple tests (mammals). A high dimensional analysis of all categorized sequences from SinEx DB shows that, in mammals, CDSs with predicted functions related to chromatin structure (B), signal transduction mechanisms (T) and translation (J) are enriched in SEGs (high proportion of SEGs to MEGs), whereas CDSs with predicted functions related to envelope biogenesis, amino acid, nucleotide, secondary metabolites and lipid metabolism have the lowest SEGs to MEGs proportion. The P value was obtained using the Pearson’s chi-squared test and corrected by Sidak multiple testing method (31). Asterisk indicates statistical significance, P < 0.05. The results indicate that the distribution of SEGs within the functional categories of the different genomes is nonuniform, with statistical support (P < 0.05) in some instances. For example, an enrichment of SEGs relative to MEGs was observed in functions related to: (i) chromatin structure and dynamics including histones, (ii) signal transduction mechanisms including G protein-coupled cell surface receptors (GPCRs) and (iii) translation related proteins, such as ribosomal proteins (Figure 3). These observations support and extend the earlier reports for the distribution of SEGs in human (6, 8, 20, 30) and mouse (2). The enrichment of SEGs for histones has been proposed to expedite their rapid synthesis and high levels of gene expression during DNA replication (6). Consistent with this hypothesis, is the observation that introns are found in replacement histone genes which have a cell-cycle-independent pattern of expression (32). It has been established earlier that GPCRs, one of the largest classes of mammalian receptor, are predominantly intronless (5–7). The majority of GPCR genes are related to nervous central system (CNS) activities, which often require high levels of gene expression. There is also an enrichment of SEGs relative to MEGs potentially encoding ‘translation related functions’ (KOG category J) in all the mammalian genomes analyzed (Figure 3). 83% (1499 sequences) of these SEGs potentially encode ribosomal proteins. The reason for this enrichment is unknown and calls for an explication(s). Many of these ribosomal proteins are highly expressed in a cell cycle-dependent way (33) and they could be encoded by SEGs for reasons similar to those proposed for histone genes. However, some of the ribosomal proteins encoded by SEGs exhibit diverse functional roles such as in ribosome biogenesis, cell proliferation, differentiation, apoptosis and DNA repair (34, 35) and these functions might also play a role in SEG enrichment. On the other hand, there is a depletion of SEGs relative to MEGs in genes with predicted functions related to: (i) amino acid transport and metabolism, (ii) nucleotide transport and metabolism, (iii) lipid transport and metabolism, (iv) cell wall/membrane/envelope biogenesis and (v) secondary metabolites biosynthesis, transport and catabolism. These categories are important components of central metabolism and part of the core genome of mammals (36, 37). We hypothesize that these categories are depleted in SEGs (i.e. enriched in introns) because introns may play an important role in increasing genetic diversity through alternative splicing. It has also been suggested that introns may carry out regulatory functions to coordinate expression of genes that are components of metabolic networks, such as those found in the above five categories, and thus be under positive selection for introns (6, 38, 39).

Conclusions

SinEx DB provides an opportunity to address questions regarding the occurrence, distribution, evolution and function of single exon coding sequences (SEGs) in 10 diverse mammalian genomes. SinEx DB complements existing databases such as retrogene DB (11) and pseudogene DB (27). It could also be used as a comparative platform for annotating single exon coding sequences in mammalian genomes. Interrogation of SinEx DB was used successfully to correlate the enrichment or depletion of SEGs with predicted KOG functional categories, uncovering new relationships between SEGs and gene function that now require explanation.

Future perspectives

It is proposed to update SinEx DB twice a year with annotated SEGs from additional completely sequenced eukaryotic genomes, ranging from unicellular eukaryotes to other mammals. Future versions of the database will include alternative functional GO classifications, this may complement KOG classifications and allow more detailed functional analysis, information related to predicted introns in the UTR regions of SEGs. This could be an important resource considering the relevance of UTR introns in cellular biology and gene expression (40–42). We propose that SEGs from different and diverse genomes available in future versions of SinEx DB will provide additional opportunities to analyze many-to-many comparisons between genomes.

Availability and requirements

SinEx DB is freely and publicly available at http://www.sinex.cl and the complete dataset is available for download by ftp.

Supplementary data

Supplementary data are available at Database Online.
  42 in total

1.  Characterization of C14orf4, a novel intronless human gene containing a polyglutamine repeat, mapped to the ARVD1 critical region.

Authors:  A Rampazzo; F Pivotto; G Occhi; N Tiso; S Bortoluzzi; L Rowen; L Hood; A Nava; G A Danieli
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  2000-11-30       Impact factor: 3.575

Review 2.  RNA regulation: a new genetics?

Authors:  John S Mattick
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 53.242

3.  Combining probability from independent tests: the weighted Z-method is superior to Fisher's approach.

Authors:  M C Whitlock
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.411

4.  Recent de novo origin of human protein-coding genes.

Authors:  David G Knowles; Aoife McLysaght
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2009-09-02       Impact factor: 9.043

5.  IGD: a resource for intronless genes in the human genome.

Authors:  Amel Louhichi; Ahmed Fourati; Ahmed Rebaï
Journal:  Gene       Date:  2011-09-02       Impact factor: 3.688

6.  Combinatorial action of transcription factors orchestrates cell cycle-dependent expression of the ribosomal protein genes and ribosome biogenesis.

Authors:  Nagisa Nosrati; Neetu R Kapoor; Vijay Kumar
Journal:  FEBS J       Date:  2014-04-07       Impact factor: 5.542

7.  The conservation and evolutionary modularity of metabolism.

Authors:  José M Peregrín-Alvarez; Chris Sanford; John Parkinson
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2009-06-12       Impact factor: 13.583

8.  RCPedia: a database of retrocopied genes.

Authors:  Fábio C P Navarro; Pedro A F Galante
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 6.937

9.  The COG database: an updated version includes eukaryotes.

Authors:  Roman L Tatusov; Natalie D Fedorova; John D Jackson; Aviva R Jacobs; Boris Kiryutin; Eugene V Koonin; Dmitri M Krylov; Raja Mazumder; Sergei L Mekhedov; Anastasia N Nikolskaya; B Sridhar Rao; Sergei Smirnov; Alexander V Sverdlov; Sona Vasudevan; Yuri I Wolf; Jodie J Yin; Darren A Natale
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2003-09-11       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Functional protein divergence in the evolution of Homo sapiens.

Authors:  Nuria Lopez-Bigas; Subhajyoti De; Sarah A Teichmann
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2008-02-15       Impact factor: 13.583

View more
  12 in total

Review 1.  Protein-Coding Genes' Retrocopies and Their Functions.

Authors:  Magdalena Regina Kubiak; Izabela Makałowska
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2017-04-13       Impact factor: 5.048

Review 2.  The Reprimo Gene Family: A Novel Gene Lineage in Gastric Cancer with Tumor Suppressive Properties.

Authors:  Julio D Amigo; Juan C Opazo; Roddy Jorquera; Ignacio A Wichmann; Benjamin A Garcia-Bloj; Maria Alejandra Alarcon; Gareth I Owen; Alejandro H Corvalán
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2018-06-25       Impact factor: 5.923

3.  Improved ontology for eukaryotic single-exon coding sequences in biological databases.

Authors:  Roddy Jorquera; Carolina González; Philip Clausen; Bent Petersen; David S Holmes
Journal:  Database (Oxford)       Date:  2018-01-01       Impact factor: 3.451

4.  Phylogenetic and genomic analyses of the ribosomal oxygenases Riox1 (No66) and Riox2 (Mina53) provide new insights into their evolution.

Authors:  Katharina E Bräuer; Kevin Brockers; Jasmin Moneer; Annette Feuchtinger; Evi Wollscheid-Lengeling; Andreas Lengeling; Alexander Wolf
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2018-06-19       Impact factor: 3.260

5.  Small, but surprisingly repetitive genomes: transposon expansion and not polyploidy has driven a doubling in genome size in a metazoan species complex.

Authors:  J Blommaert; S Riss; B Hecox-Lea; D B Mark Welch; C P Stelzer
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2019-06-07       Impact factor: 3.969

6.  Analysis of long non-coding RNA and mRNA expression in bovine macrophages brings up novel aspects of Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis infections.

Authors:  Pooja Gupta; Sarah Peter; Markus Jung; Astrid Lewin; Georg Hemmrich-Stanisak; Andre Franke; Max von Kleist; Christof Schütte; Ralf Einspanier; Soroush Sharbati; Jennifer Zur Bruegge
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-02-07       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Genetic basis of functional variability in adhesion G protein-coupled receptors.

Authors:  Alexander Bernd Knierim; Juliane Röthe; Mehmet Volkan Çakir; Vera Lede; Caroline Wilde; Ines Liebscher; Doreen Thor; Torsten Schöneberg
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-07-30       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  SinEx DB 2.0 update 2020: database for eukaryotic single-exon coding sequences.

Authors:  R Jorquera; C González; P T L C Clausen; B Petersen; D S Holmes
Journal:  Database (Oxford)       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 3.451

9.  The evolution of the huntingtin-associated protein 40 (HAP40) in conjunction with huntingtin.

Authors:  Manuel Seefelder; Vikram Alva; Bin Huang; Tatjana Engler; Wolfgang Baumeister; Qiang Guo; Rubén Fernández-Busnadiego; Andrei N Lupas; Stefan Kochanek
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2020-12-09       Impact factor: 3.260

10.  Genome-wide analysis of European sea bass provides insights into the evolution and functions of single-exon genes.

Authors:  Mbaye Tine; Heiner Kuhl; Peter R Teske; Richard Reinhardt
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-04-02       Impact factor: 2.912

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.