Literature DB >> 27278408

Significance of acoustic field for the myocardial opacification by intravenous contrast echocardiography.

Sachiko Yagura1, Shintaro Beppu1, Fuminobu Ishikura1, Toshihiko Asanuma1, Juri Okazaki1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Myocardial opacification is not always homogeneous even in a normal heart. The aim of this study is to clarify why myocardial opacification is faint at the lateral side of the field or at the part far from the focus point.
METHODS: In canine study, videointensity of the opacification at septal and lateral walls of the short axis view was examined by using both electric and mechanical transducers. In in vitro study, acoustic pressure at several points away from the beam direction was measured using a hydrophone in a water tank. In particular, the effect of position of focus point was evaluated with an electronic transducer.
RESULTS: In canine experiment, myocardial opacification of the lateral wall was faint with the electronic transducer, however the mechanical one obtained homogeneous opacification. In vitro, using the electronic type the acoustic pressure was low as the beam shifted, laterally, whereas it was almost uniform in the mechanical type. With the electronic type, moreover, the beam width at the near field was not sharp when the focus point was far, resulting in execessive acoustic pressure.
CONCLUSION: To obtain homogeneous opacifiction, a homogeneous acoustic field is indispensable.

Entities:  

Keywords:  acoustic field; acoustic pressure; bubble; contrast echocardiography; transducer

Year:  2003        PMID: 27278408     DOI: 10.1007/BF02481284

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)        ISSN: 1346-4523            Impact factor:   1.314


  3 in total

1.  Second harmonic imaging: good reverberations.

Authors:  L J Crouse; P H Kramer
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 4.749

2.  [Optimal setting of focus points for myocardial contrast echocardiography with intravenous Optison (FS-69): an experimental study].

Authors:  M Daimon; S Beppu; F Ishikura; H Ueda; H Kobayashi; Y Kashiwagi; S Yagura; J Yoshikawa
Journal:  J Cardiol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 3.159

3.  Increased ultrasound contrast and decreased microbubble destruction rates with triggered ultrasound imaging.

Authors:  T R Porter; F Xie; S Li; A D'Sa; P Rafter
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  1996 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.251

  3 in total
  1 in total

1.  A fundamental study for quantitative measurement of ultrasound contrast concentration by low mechanical index contrast ultrasonography.

Authors:  Satoshi Yamada; Kaoru Komuro; Mariko Taniguchi; Ayumi Uranishi; Hiroshi Komatsu; Toshihiko Asanuma; Fuminobu Ishikura; Hisao Onozuka; Taisei Mikami; Hiroyuki Tsutsui; Shintaro Beppu
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 1.314

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.