| Literature DB >> 27278091 |
Jae-Hyun Park1, Miran Jang1, Yunus Emre Tarhan1, Toyomasa Katagiri2, Mitsunori Sasa3, Yasuo Miyoshi4, Krishna R Kalari5, Vera J Suman5, Richard Weinshilboum6, Liewei Wang6, Judy C Boughey7, Matthew P Goetz6, Yusuke Nakamura1.
Abstract
The immune microenvironment of tumor plays a critical role in therapeutic responses to chemotherapy. Cancer tissues are composed of a complex network between antitumor and pro-tumor immune cells and molecules; therefore a comprehensive analysis of the tumor immune condition is imperative for better understanding of the roles of the immune microenvironment in anticancer treatment response. In this study, we performed T cell receptor (TCR) repertoire analysis of tumor infiltrating T cells (TILs) in cancer tissues of pre- and post-neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) from 19 breast cancer patients; five cases showed CR (complete response), ten showed PR (partial response), and four showed SD/PD (stable disease/progressive disease) to the treatment. From the TCR sequencing results, we calculated the diversity index of the TCRβ chain and found that clonal expansion of TILs could be detected in patients who showed CR or PR to NAC. Noteworthy, the diversity of TCR was further reduced in the post-NAC tumors of CR patients. Our quantitative RT-PCR also showed that expression ratio of CD8/Foxp3 was significantly elevated in the post-NAC tumors of CR cases (p=0.0032), indicating that antitumor T cells were activated and enriched in these tumors. Collectively, our findings suggest that the clonal expansion of antitumor T cells may be a critical factor associated with response to chemotherapy and that their TCR sequences might be applicable for the development of TCR-engineered T cells treatment for individual breast cancer patients when their tumors relapse.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27278091 PMCID: PMC4922832 DOI: 10.3892/ijo.2016.3540
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Oncol ISSN: 1019-6439 Impact factor: 5.650
Clinical information of 19 female breast cancer patients.
| Patient | Response | Age | Subtype | Ki67 (%) | Chemotherapy | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MC-1 | SD/PD | 59 | TNBC | 43 | Paclitaxel → Adriamycin/Cyclophosphamide | |
| MC-2 | PR | 35 | ER−/HER2+ | ND | Paclitaxel + Trastuzumab → Adriamycin/Cyclophosphamide | |
| MC-3 | SD/PD | 60 | Luminal B | 5 | Paclitaxel → Adriamycin/Cyclophosphamide | |
| MC-4 | PR | 48 | TNBC | 6 | Paclitaxel → Adriamycin/Cyclophosphamide | |
| MC-5 | SD/PD | 35 | ER+/HER2+ | 11 | Paclitaxel + Trastuzumab → Adriamycin/Cyclophosphamide | |
| MC-6 | CR | 70 | TNBC | ND | Paclitaxel → Adriamycin/Cyclophosphamide | |
| MC-7 | PR | 38 | TNBC | 75 | Paclitaxel → Adriamycin/Cyclophosphamide | |
| MC-8 | CR | 54 | TNBC | ND | Paclitaxel → Adriamycin/Cyclophosphamide | |
| MC-9 | PR | 53 | TNBC | 6 | Paclitaxel → Adriamycin/Cyclophosphamide | |
| Patient | Response | Age | ER (%) | PgR (%) | HER2 | Chemotherapy |
| TK-1 | SD/PD | 67 | 80 | 0 | 2+ | Epirubicin/Cyclophosphamide → Docetaxel |
| TK-2 | PR | 63 | 20 | 0 | 3+ | Epirubicin/Cyclophosphamide → Docetaxel + Trastuzumab |
| TK-3 | CR | 64 | 0 | 0 | 2+ | Epirubicin/Cyclophosphamide → Paclitaxel + Trastuzumab |
| TK-4 | PR | 56 | 1 | <1 | 2+ | Epirubicin/Cyclophosphamide → Docetaxel |
| TK-5 | PR | 46 | <1 | <1 | 3+ | Epirubicin/Cyclophosphamide → Paclitaxel + Trastuzumab |
| TK-6 | CR | 64 | 0 | 0 | 3+ | Epirubicin/Cyclophosphamide → Paclitaxel + Trastuzumab |
| HG-1 | PR | 48 | 2 | 1 | - | Epirubicin/Cyclophosphamide + Capecitabine → Docetaxel + Capecitabine |
| HG-2 | PR | 57 | 0 | 0 | - | Epirubicin/Cyclophosphamide + Capecitabine → Docetaxel + Capecitabine |
| HG-3 | PR | 71 | 90 | 10 | - | 5-Fluorouracil/Epirubicin/Cyclophosphamide → Docetaxel |
| HG-4 | CR | 40 | 0 | 0 | - | Epirubicin/Cyclophosphamide + Capecitabine → Docetaxel + Capecitabine |
CR, complete response; ER, estrogen receptor; HER2, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2; ND, not done; PgR, progesterone receptor; PR, partial response; SD/PD, stable disease/progressive disease; TNBC, triple-negative breast cancer.
Figure 1Expression changes of CD4, CD8, and FoxP3 in tumors. Expression levels of CD4, CD8, and FoxP3 were graphed according to tumor samples of pre-chemotherapy (A) or post-chemotherapy (B). The x-axis indicates expression level of each gene relative to that of GAPDH. The expression ratios of CD8 and Foxp3 were graphed in the tumor samples of pre-chemotherapy (C) or post-chemotherapy (D). Vertical lines represent the means ± standard deviations, and asterisks indicate *p<0.05 or **p<0.01.
Figure 2Expression of IDO1, PD-1, and PD-L1 in tumors. Expression levels of IDO1, PD-1, and PD-L1 were graphed in the tumor samples of pre-chemotherapy (A) or post-chemotherapy (B). The x-axis indicates expression level of each gene relative to that of GAPDH. Vertical lines represent the means ± standard deviations.
Figure 3The clonality of T lymphocytes in tumors of 19 breast cancer patients. (A) All identified CDR3 clonotypes of TCR β chain are presented in pie charts (left, pre-chemotherapy; right, post-chemotherapy). Since each pie chart was separately colored according to the CDR3 frequency ranks, the same color did not represent an identical CDR3 clonotype. (B) Comparison of TCRB clonotypes identified in tumors. Vertical axis indicates each of CDR3 clonotype (frequency >0.001) of TCRB in tumors of pre-chemotherapy (blue) and post-chemotherapy (red). CDR3 clonotypes are sorted by their frequency in tumors (y-axis).
Figure 4Changes in the diversity of TCRB by chemotherapy. (A) The diversity indexes (DIs) of TCRB were graphed according to patient's response to chemotherapy (left, pre-chemotherapy; right, post-chemotherapy). (B) Fold changes in the DI of TCRB were calculated and graphed according to the patient's response. Vertical lines represent the means ± standard deviations. Arrow indicates an exceptional case of CR, MC-8 sample.