Literature DB >> 2727797

The effect of flexion-extension motion of the lumbar spine on the capacity of the spinal canal. An experimental study.

L Y Dai1, Y K Xu, W M Zhang, Z H Zhou.   

Abstract

The symptoms of lumbar spinal stenosis are often posture-dependent, and it is generally accepted that the capacity of the spinal canal is affected by flexion-extension motions of the lumbar spine. A study of spinal capacity in flexion-extension of ten cadaver specimens on the lumbar spine was done and measurements were obtained from the flexion-extension lateral myelograms. There proved to be a larger capacity of dural sac of 3.5 to 6.0 ml (4.85 +/- 0.75 ml) in flexion than in extension, and the differences were highly significant (P less than 0.001). In addition, the sagittal diameter of the dural sac and the length of the spinal canal increased from extension to flexion. Because of the effect of flexion-extension motion of the lumbar spine on the spinal capacity, we suggest that maintaining the lumbar spine in flexion is more suitable since spinal canal capacity is enlarged and symptoms may be mitigated.

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2727797

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  9 in total

1.  Effect of a novel interspinous implant on lumbar spinal range of motion.

Authors:  Robert Gunzburg; Marek Szpalski; Stuart A Callary; Christopher J Colloca; Victor Kosmopoulos; Deed Harrison; Robert J Moore
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-02-07       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Foraminal changes with distraction and compression of the L4/5 and L5/S1 segments.

Authors:  T Humke; D Grob; W Grauer; A Sandler; J Dvorak
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Critical analysis of lumbar interspinous devices failures: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Francesco Ciro Tamburrelli; Luca Proietti; Carlo Ambrogio Logroscino
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-03-15       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Roentgenographic and computed tomographic findings in symptomatic lumbar foraminal stenosis.

Authors:  Katsutaka Yamada; Yoichi Aota; Takayuki Higashi; Ko Ishida; Takanori Niimura; Tomoyuki Konno; Tomoyuki Saito
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-11-21       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  The vertebral foramen: a report concerning its contents.

Authors:  F de Peretti; I Hovorka; P Ganansia; J M Puch; A Bourgeon; C Argenson
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 1.246

6.  Segmental spinal canal volume in patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis.

Authors:  Jun Miao; Shaobai Wang; Won Man Park; Qun Xia; Xiutong Fang; Martin P Torriani; Kirkham B Wood; Guoan Li
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 4.166

7.  Lumbar disc herniation in patients with developmental spinal stenosis.

Authors:  L Y Dai; B Ni; L S Jia; H K Liu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  The prevalence of redundant nerve roots in standing positional MRI decreases by half in supine and almost to zero in flexed seated position: a retrospective cross-sectional cohort study.

Authors:  Luca Papavero; Nawar Ali; Kathrin Schawjinski; Annette Holtdirk; Rainer Maas; Stella Ebert
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2022-09-09       Impact factor: 2.995

9.  Impact of pedicle-lengthening osteotomy on spinal canal volume and neural foramen size in three types of lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  P Li; L Qian; W D Wu; C F Wu; J Ouyang
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 5.853

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.