Denalee O'Malley1,2,3,4, Shawna V Hudson5,6,7,8, Larissa Nekhlyudov9, Jenna Howard5,6,7, Ellen Rubinstein5,6,7, Heather S Lee5,6,7, Linda S Overholser10, Amy Shaw11, Sarah Givens12, Jay S Burton13, Eva Grunfeld14,15, Carly Parry16, Benjamin F Crabtree5,6,7,8. 1. Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA. omalledm@rwjms.rutgers.edu. 2. Rutgers Biomedical and Health Sciences, New Brunswick, NJ, USA. omalledm@rwjms.rutgers.edu. 3. Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, 1 World's Fair Drive, Suite 1500, Somerset, New Brunswick, NJ, 08873, USA. omalledm@rwjms.rutgers.edu. 4. Rutgers, School of Social Work, New Brunswick, NJ, USA. omalledm@rwjms.rutgers.edu. 5. Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA. 6. Rutgers Biomedical and Health Sciences, New Brunswick, NJ, USA. 7. Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, 1 World's Fair Drive, Suite 1500, Somerset, New Brunswick, NJ, 08873, USA. 8. Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA. 9. Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. 10. Department of General Internal Medicine, University of Colorado, Denver, CO, USA. 11. Annadel Medical Group, Santa Rosa, CA, USA. 12. North Perth Family Health, Listowel, ON, Canada. 13. Springfield Medical Associates, Enfield, CT, USA. 14. Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada. 15. Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada. 16. Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI), Washington, DC, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: This study describes the experiences of early implementers of primary care-focused cancer survivorship delivery models. METHODS: Snowball sampling was used to identify innovators. Twelve participants (five cancer survivorship primary care innovators and seven content experts) attended a working conference focused on cancer survivorship population strategies and primary care transformation. Data included meeting discussion transcripts/field notes, transcribed in-depth innovator interviews, and innovators' summaries of care models. We used a multistep immersion/crystallization analytic approach, guided by a primary care organizational change model. RESULTS: Innovative practice models included: (1) a consultative model in a primary care setting; (2) a primary care physician (PCP)-led, blended consultative/panel-based model in an oncology setting; (3) an oncology nurse navigator in a primary care practice; and (4) two subspecialty models where PCPs in a general medical practice dedicated part of their patient panel to cancer survivors. Implementation challenges included (1) lack of key stakeholder buy-in; (2) practice resources allocated to competing (non-survivorship) change efforts; and (3) competition with higher priority initiatives incentivized by payers. CONCLUSIONS: Cancer survivorship delivery models are potentially feasible in primary care; however, significant barriers to widespread implementation exist. Implementation efforts would benefit from increasing the awareness and potential value-add of primary care-focused strategies to address survivors' needs. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Current models of primary care-based cancer survivorship care may not be sustainable. Innovative strategies to provide quality care to this growing population of survivors need to be developed and integrated into primary care settings.
PURPOSE: This study describes the experiences of early implementers of primary care-focused cancer survivorship delivery models. METHODS: Snowball sampling was used to identify innovators. Twelve participants (five cancer survivorship primary care innovators and seven content experts) attended a working conference focused on cancer survivorship population strategies and primary care transformation. Data included meeting discussion transcripts/field notes, transcribed in-depth innovator interviews, and innovators' summaries of care models. We used a multistep immersion/crystallization analytic approach, guided by a primary care organizational change model. RESULTS: Innovative practice models included: (1) a consultative model in a primary care setting; (2) a primary care physician (PCP)-led, blended consultative/panel-based model in an oncology setting; (3) an oncology nurse navigator in a primary care practice; and (4) two subspecialty models where PCPs in a general medical practice dedicated part of their patient panel to cancer survivors. Implementation challenges included (1) lack of key stakeholder buy-in; (2) practice resources allocated to competing (non-survivorship) change efforts; and (3) competition with higher priority initiatives incentivized by payers. CONCLUSIONS:Cancer survivorship delivery models are potentially feasible in primary care; however, significant barriers to widespread implementation exist. Implementation efforts would benefit from increasing the awareness and potential value-add of primary care-focused strategies to address survivors' needs. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Current models of primary care-based cancer survivorship care may not be sustainable. Innovative strategies to provide quality care to this growing population of survivors need to be developed and integrated into primary care settings.
Entities:
Keywords:
Cancer survivorship models; Implementation research; Integration of care; Primary care; Qualitative
Authors: William L Miller; Benjamin F Crabtree; Paul A Nutting; Kurt C Stange; Carlos Roberto Jaén Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2010 Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Carrie N Klabunde; Paul K J Han; Craig C Earle; Tenbroeck Smith; John Z Ayanian; Richard Lee; Anita Ambs; Julia H Rowland; Arnold L Potosky Journal: Fam Med Date: 2013 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 1.756
Authors: Katelyn K Jetelina; Simon Craddock Lee; Quiera S Booker-Nubie; Udoka C Obinwa; Hong Zhu; Michael E Miller; Navid Sadeghi; Umber Dickerson; Bijal A Balasubramanian Journal: J Cancer Surviv Date: 2022-01-05 Impact factor: 4.062
Authors: Madeleine Love; Marc Debay; Anne Charity Hudley; Todd Sorsby; Linda Lucero; Stuart Miller; Sagus Sampath; Arya Amini; Dan Raz; Jae Kim; Ranjan Pathak; Yi-Jen Chen; Andreas Kaiser; Kurt Melstrom; Marwan Fakih; Virginia Sun Journal: J Prim Care Community Health Date: 2022 Jan-Dec
Authors: Ellen B Rubinstein; William L Miller; Shawna V Hudson; Jenna Howard; Denalee O'Malley; Jennifer Tsui; Heather Sophia Lee; Alicja Bator; Benjamin F Crabtree Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2017-12-01 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: Caitlin B Biddell; Lisa P Spees; Deborah K Mayer; Stephanie B Wheeler; Justin G Trogdon; Jason Rotter; Sarah A Birken Journal: Cancer Date: 2020-12-01 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Jennifer Tsui; Jenna Howard; Denalee O'Malley; William L Miller; Shawna V Hudson; Ellen B Rubinstein; Jeanne M Ferrante; Alicja Bator; Benjamin F Crabtree Journal: BMC Fam Pract Date: 2019-11-28 Impact factor: 2.497
Authors: Sarah D Hohl; Jennifer E Bird; Claire V T Nguyen; Heather D'Angelo; Mara Minion; Danielle Pauk; Robert T Adsit; Michael Fiore; Margaret B Nolan; Betsy Rolland Journal: Curr Oncol Date: 2022-03-29 Impact factor: 3.109