Literature DB >> 27277483

Trial of a quantitative method for evaluating hemangioma of the liver and hepatocellular carcinoma using a radio-frequency signal.

Kazutoki Kogure1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: In recent years, advances in ultrasonographic techniques have allowed the detection of even small hepatocellular carcinomas. However, many cases do not show distinctive ultrasonographic features. A quantitative ultrasonographic procedure for making the diagnosis would therefore be desirable. It is recognized that radio-frequency (RF) signals from hepatic tumors conform to the K distribution. The K distribution is used for the characterization of the statistical properties of backscattering signals from heterogeneous regions. In this study, RF signals were acquired from hemangioma of the liver (hemangioma) and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and parameters of the K distribution, i.e., φ (the mean square of the amplitude of RF signals) and α (the number of effective scatterers), were calculated for the quantitative ultrasonographic evaluation of hepatic tumors.
METHODS: This study included 10 nodules of 10 patients with hemangioma and 27 nodules of 24 patients with HCC. The A-mode RF signals passing through the hepatic tumors were acquired with an Aloka SSD-1000 ultrasound system, and measurement units comprising 279 points were set on the RF signals corresponding to the tumor lesion. The parameters of the K distribution that were most consistent with the histogram were calculated and assessed.
RESULTS: With regard to φ, the values were high in hemangioma, and there was a significant (P < 0.05) difference in the φ value between hemangioma and HCC. On the other hand, there was no significant difference in the α value between hemangioma and HCC.
CONCLUSION: The α values of hemangioma were equivalent to those of HCC, while the φ values for hemangioma were higher than those for HCC. It was deduced from these observations that a situation in which an electron beam is likely to scatter exists in the tumor. This is also consistent with the pathological findings reported from previous studies. The use of these parameters is expected to allow quantitative ultrasonographic evaluation of hepatic tumors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  K distribution; hemangioma of the liver; hepatocellular carcinoma; radio-frequency signal; ultrasonography

Year:  2005        PMID: 27277483     DOI: 10.1007/s10396-005-0059-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)        ISSN: 1346-4523            Impact factor:   1.314


  22 in total

1.  Effective density estimators based on the K distribution: interest of low and fractional order moments.

Authors:  F Ossant; F Patat; M Lebertre; M L Teriierooiterai; L Pourcelot
Journal:  Ultrason Imaging       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 1.578

Review 2.  The current status of imaging diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Byung Ihn Choi
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 5.799

3.  Random field models in the textural analysis of ultrasonic images of the liver.

Authors:  J S Bleck; U Ranft; M Gebel; H Hecker; M Westhoff-Bleck; C Thiesemann; S Wagner; M Manns
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 10.048

4.  Non-Rayleigh statistics of ultrasonic backscattered signals.

Authors:  V M Narayanan; P M Shankar; J M Reid
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.725

5.  Needle-tract implantation in hepatocellular carcinoma: frequency and CT findings after biopsy with a 19.5-gauge automated biopsy gun.

Authors:  S H Kim; H K Lim; W J Lee; J M Cho; H J Jang
Journal:  Abdom Imaging       Date:  2000 May-Jun

6.  Quantitative ultrasonic analysis of liver metastases.

Authors:  H J Huisman; J M Thijssen; D J Wagener; G J Rosenbusch
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 2.998

7.  Ultrasonic characterization of abdominal tissues via digital analysis of backscattered waveforms.

Authors:  F G Sommer; L F Joynt; B A Carroll; A Macovski
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1981-12       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 8.  Diagnostic imaging of hepatocellular carcinoma: progress in noninvasive tissue characterization.

Authors:  C R Taylor; K J Taylor
Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 3.062

Review 9.  Complications of percutaneous abdominal fine-needle biopsy. Review.

Authors:  E H Smith
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Hepatocellular carcinoma: sonographic and histologic correlation.

Authors:  S Tanaka; T Kitamura; S Imaoka; Y Sasaki; H Taniguchi; S Ishiguro
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1983-04       Impact factor: 3.959

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.