| Literature DB >> 27275870 |
Mohammad Nurul Azam1,2, Mohammad Shahjahan3, Mahbuba Yeasmin4, Nasar U Ahmed5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cost, social acceptability and non-stringent regulations pertaining to smokeless tobacco (SLT) product sales have made people choose and continue using SLT. If disaggregated data on smokeless forms and smoked practices of tobacco are reviewed, the incidence of SLT remains static. There is a strong positive correlation of SLT intake with the occurrence of adverse cardiovascular disease, particularly in the low socioeconomic populations. AIMS: To investigate the prevalence of smokeless tobacco, its initiation influence and risk factors associated with the practice among lower socioeconomic populations of Bangladesh. In this study, we explore the utilization of SLT among lower socioeconomic populations in industrialized zone of Bangladesh.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27275870 PMCID: PMC4898710 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0156887
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Socio-demographic features of survey participants.
| Background variable | Male n (%) | Female n (%) | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | |||
| 15–25 | 6 (2.6) | 7 (3.0) | 0.45 |
| 26–35 | 58 (25.2) | 56 (24.3) | |
| 36–45 | 94 (40.9) | 91 (39.6) | |
| 46–55 | 47 (20.4) | 37 (16.2) | |
| 56–65 | 17 (7.4) | 29 (12.6) | |
| 66+ | 8 (3.5) | 10 (4.3) | |
| Mean±SD | 42.53±11.12 | 43.97±11.24 | |
| Area | |||
| Demra | 115 (50.0) | 115 (50.0) | 0.99 |
| Tongi | 115 (50.0) | 115 (50.0) | |
| Educational status | |||
| No formal education | 115 (50.0) | 151 (65.7) | <0.001 |
| Primary | 36 (15.7) | 42 (18.2) | |
| Secondary | 63 (27.3) | 34 (14.8) | |
| HSC and above | 16 (7.0) | 3 (1.3) | |
| Occupation | |||
| Housewife | 1 (0.4) | 142 (61.7) | <0.001 |
| Service | 92 (40.0) | 11 (4.8) | |
| Business | 88 (38.3) | 10 (4.3) | |
| Garments workers/Day labourer/Others | 49 (21.3) | 67 (29.2) | |
| Marital status | |||
| Married | 222 (96.5) | 190 (82.6) | <0.001 |
| Unmarried/Divorced/Widow | 8 (3.5) | 40 (17.4) | |
| Family size | |||
| ≤4 | 132 (57.4) | 117 (50.9) | 0.16 |
| > = 5 | 98 (42.6) | 113 (49.1) | |
| Family history of use of SLT | |||
| Yes | 83 (36.1) | 63 (27.4) | 0.045 |
| No | 147 (63.9) | 167 (72.6) | |
The findings were presented as n (%) and mean±SD, χ2-test was used. *The level of significance at α = 0.05, (The P-values in the last column are the significance level of the Chi-square distribution for each 2-way contingency tables)
Features of smokeless tobacco consumers by sex.
| Background variable | Male n (%) | Female n (%) | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age of initiation (years) | |||
| ≤15 | 15 (6.5) | 18 (7.8) | 0.06 |
| 15–24 | 88 (38.3) | 110 (47.8) | |
| 25–34 | 96 (41.7) | 67 (29.1) | |
| 35–44 | 23 (10.0) | 22 (9.6) | |
| 45+ | 8 (3.5) | 13 (5.7) | |
| Mean±SD | 26.43±8.57 | 25.83±9.75 | 0.48 |
| Types of use of SLT | |||
| Zarda | 216 (98.2) | 203 (91.9) | <0.001 |
| Sadapata | 7 (3.2) | 23 (10.4) | |
| Gul | 13 (5.9) | 22 (10.0) | |
| Panmasla | 6 (2.7) | 8 (3.6) | |
| Number of use of SLT/day | |||
| < = 5 | 70 (30.4) | 103 (44.8) | <0.005 |
| 6 to 10 | 101 (43.9) | 89 (38.7) | |
| 11 to 15 | 32 (13.9) | 15 (6.5) | |
| 16–20 | 12 (5.3) | 14 (6.1) | |
| 20+ | 15 (6.5) | 9 (3.9) | |
| Mean±SD | 10.05±08.0 | 08.34±6.67 | 0.013 |
| Duration of use of SLT (years) | |||
| 1–5 | 37 (16.1) | 41 (17.8) | 0.16 |
| 6–10 | 43 (18.7) | 37 (16.1) | |
| 11–15 | 46 (20.0) | 32 (13.9) | |
| 16–20 | 45 (19.6) | 40 (17.4) | |
| ≥21 | 59 (25.6) | 80 (34.8) | |
| Mean±SD | 16.10±10.28 | 18.13±11.91 | 0.05 |
| Currently using cigarette, bidi along with SLT | |||
| Yes | 101 (43.9) | 3 (1.3) | <0.001 |
| No | 129 (56.1) | 227 (98.7) | |
| Number of cigarette smoked per day | |||
| Up to 10 | 55 (54.5) | 2 (66.7) | 0.99 |
| More than 10 | 45 (45.5) | 1 (33.3) | |
| Mean±SD | 14.31±9.79 | 10.00±8.87 | 0.45 |
The findings were presented as n (%) and mean±SD, χ2-test and t-test were used. *The level of significance at α = 0.05
*Using the Multiple Response Sets option of the table’s procedure.
**Using Fisher’s exact test. The P-values in the last column are the significance level of the Chi-square distribution for each 2-way contingency tables)
Frequency of smokeless tobacco daily use and social-demographic features.
| Characteristics | N | Mean | SD | p-value | Adjusted for Socio-demographic variables | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| β | F-value | p-value | |||||
| Area | |||||||
| Demra | 230 | 11.57 | 9.1 | <0.001 | |||
| Tongi | 230 | 6.83 | 3.99 | -0.32 | 52.3 | <0.001 | |
| Gender | |||||||
| Male | 230 | 10.05 | 8 | 0.013 | 0.12 | 6.2 | 0.013 |
| Female | 230 | 8.34 | 6.67 | ||||
| Age (years) | |||||||
| ≤25 | 13 | 5.23 | 2.39 | 0.407 | |||
| 26–35 | 114 | 9.81 | 9.34 | 0.267 | |||
| 36–45 | 185 | 9.16 | 6.75 | 0.26 | |||
| 46–55 | 84 | 8.99 | 7.43 | 0.196 | |||
| 56–65 | 46 | 8.87 | 5.46 | 0.147 | |||
| 66+ | 18 | 10.33 | 6.35 | 0.134 | 1.016 | 0.407 | |
| Educational status | |||||||
| No formal education | 266 | 9.15 | 6.84 | 0.047 | |||
| Primary | 78 | 8.1 | 7.01 | -0.053 | |||
| Secondary | 97 | 10.69 | 9.3 | 0.085 | |||
| HSC and above | 19 | 6.63 | 4.07 | -0.068 | 2.672 | 0.047 | |
| Occupation | |||||||
| Housewife | 143 | 9.26 | 7.41 | 0.029 | |||
| Service | 103 | 9.5 | 7.65 | 0.013 | |||
| Business | 98 | 10.63 | 8.45 | 0.076 | |||
| Garments workers/ Day laborer/Others | 116 | 7.64 | 5.9 | -0.095 | 3.037 | 0.029 | |
*Reference group, p-value by t-test, one-way ANOVA
Results of logistic regression with smokeless tobacco habit related disease.
| Independent variables | β | p-value | OR | 95% CI for Exp (β) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lower | Upper | ||||
| Area | |||||
| Demra | Reference | ||||
| Tongi | 0.093 | 0.709 | 1.097 | 0.675 | 1.783 |
| Gender | |||||
| Female | Reference | ||||
| Male | 0.253 | 0.472 | 1.288 | 0.646 | 2.567 |
| Age (years) | 0.022 | 0.105 | 1.022 | 0.995 | 1.05 |
| Educational status | |||||
| No formal education | Reference | ||||
| Primary | 0.014 | 0.964 | 1.014 | 0.542 | 1.898 |
| Secondary | 0.135 | 0.644 | 1.145 | 0.645 | 2.034 |
| HSC and above | 1.051 | 0.039 | 2.86 | 1.053 | 7.764 |
| Occupation | |||||
| Housewife | Reference | ||||
| Service | 0.417 | 0.35 | 1.518 | 0.633 | 3.638 |
| Business | 0.506 | 0.246 | 1.659 | 0.706 | 3.897 |
| Garments workers/ Day labourer/Others | -0.028 | 0.94 | 0.972 | 0.467 | 2.022 |
| Frequency of use of SLT times/day | |||||
| <5 | Reference | ||||
| 6–10 | 0.513 | 0.054 | 1.67 | 0.992 | 2.814 |
| 11–15 | 0.07 | 0.869 | 1.073 | 0.465 | 2.474 |
| 16–20 | 0.361 | 0.481 | 1.434 | 0.526 | 3.914 |
| 21+ | 1.194 | 0.015 | 3.301 | 1.263 | 8.628 |
| Duration of use of SLT | 0.004 | 0.794 | 1.004 | 0.977 | 1.031 |
| Constant | -2.851 | 0 | 0.058 | ||
* Coefficient
** Odds Ratio