Literature DB >> 27275807

Making Room at the Table for Obstetrics, Midwifery, and a Culture of Normalcy Within Maternity Care.

Chitra P Akileswaran1, Margaret S Hutchison.   

Abstract

The principle of avoiding the worst possible outcomes guided the enormous successes of modern obstetrics in reducing the morbidity and mortality of childbirth. The challenges of improving the quality of childbirth today has prompted health care providers, policymakers, and patients to ask whether this principle is in fact preventing us from supporting the normal processes of childbirth, resulting in undue intervention and potentially causing harm. In this commentary, we suggest that recognizing the strengths of the medical model of childbirth does not preclude looking outside of it to meet the maternity care needs of the majority of healthy, low-risk women. Obstetricians have the good fortune to have a partner in their work among midwives, who hail from a long tradition of incorporating a perspective of "normalcy" in the care of childbearing women. Given the many evidence-based practices demonstrating the strengths of midwifery to actualize patient-centered, low-intervention birth, we advocate for the explicit establishment of professional standards for team-based physician-midwife care. More than merely introducing midwives into a physician-dominated setting, this means elevating the contributions of midwives and meaningfully incorporating a culture of normalcy to standardize practices such as intermittent auscultation, continuous birth support, nonpharmacologic pain management, and positional flexibility in labor. The literature suggests that a woman's health care provider is the most powerful determinant of her birth outcomes; striking the balance between averting poor outcomes and normalcy compels us to make room at the table for both obstetricians and midwives.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27275807     DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001493

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  5 in total

1.  Midwives' experience of their education, knowledge and practice around immersion in water for labour or birth.

Authors:  Lucy Lewis; Yvonne L Hauck; Janice Butt; Chloe Western; Helen Overing; Corrinne Poletti; Jessica Priest; Dawn Hudd; Brooke Thomson
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2018-06-19       Impact factor: 3.007

2.  Challenges to the improvement of obstetric care in maternity hospitals of a large Brazilian city: an exploratory qualitative approach on contextual issues.

Authors:  Margareth Crisóstomo Portela; Sheyla Maria Lemos Lima; Lenice Gnocchi da Costa Reis; Mônica Martins; Emma-Louise Aveling
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2018-11-26       Impact factor: 3.007

3.  Evaluating the development, woman-centricity and psychometric properties of maternity patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and patient-reported experience measures (PREMs): A systematic review protocol.

Authors:  Claudia Bull; Helena Teede; Lane Carrandi; Azure Rigney; Sally Cusack; Emily Callander
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-02-10       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Contrasting Birth Preferences to Practices in El Paso, Texas.

Authors:  Rachel S Curtis; Regina Vadney; Carina Heckert; Cathy Román
Journal:  Front Glob Womens Health       Date:  2022-03-29

5.  Association between maternal satisfaction and other indicators of quality of care at childbirth: a cross-sectional study based on the WHO standards.

Authors:  Marzia Lazzerini; Ilaria Mariani; Chiara Semenzato; Emanuelle Pessa Valente
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-09-14       Impact factor: 2.692

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.