| Literature DB >> 27275607 |
Chia-Lin Hsu1, Ching-Wei Hsu2, Pei-Ching Chang1, Wen-Hung Huang2,3, Cheng-Hao Weng2,3, Huang-Yu Yang2,3, Shou-Hsuan Liu2,3, Kuan-Hsing Chen2,3, Shu-Man Weng2, Chih-Chun Chang4, I-Kuan Wang5, Aileen I Tsai1, Tzung-Hai Yen2,3,6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The pathogenesis of oral tori has long been debated and is thought to be the product of both genetic and environmental factors, including occlusal forces. Another proposed mechanism for oral tori is the combination of biomechanical forces, particularly in the oral cavity, combined with cortical bone loss and trabecular expansion, as one might see in the early stages of primary hyperparathyroidism. This study investigated the epidemiology of torus palatinus (TP) and torus mandibularis (TM) in peritoneal dialysis patients, and analyzed the influences of hyperparathyroidism on the formation of oral tori.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27275607 PMCID: PMC4898723 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0156988
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1a, b. Torus palatinus. Intraoral view of two peritoneal dialysis patients with a flat torus palatinus (asterisk), which is an exophytic bony mass that arises along the midline of the hard palate. c, d. Torus mandibularis. Intraoral view of two peritoneal dialysis patients with a symmetrical lobular torus mandibularis (asterisk), which is an exophytic bony mass that arises along the lingual aspect of the mandible. Heavy dental calculus accumulating at cervical portion of teeth was also found in most patients.
Baseline characteristics of peritoneal dialysis patients with or without oral tori (n = 134).
| Variable | All patients (n = 134) | Patients with oral tori (n = 57) | Patients without oral tori (n = 77) | P value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, year | 47.2±14.9 | 46.2±14.9 | 47.9±15.0 | 0.521 |
| Female sex, n (%) | 69 (51.5) | 35 (61.4) | 34 (44.2) | 0.048 |
| Body mass index, kg/m2 | 23.0±4.4 | 23.5±5.2 | 22.6±3.7 | 0.264 |
| Hypertension, n (%) | 81 (60.4) | 36 (63.2) | 45 (58.4) | 0.581 |
| Diabetes mellitus, n (%) | 24 (17.9) | 8 (14.0) | 16 (20.8) | 0.314 |
| Coronary artery disease, n (%) | 11 (8.2) | 6 (10.5) | 5 (6.5) | 0.400 |
| Dialysis duration, months | 60.5±43.3 | 62.9±43.1 | 57.3±43.7 | 0.455 |
| Smoking habit, n (%) | 14 (10.4) | 4 (7.0) | 10 (13.0) | 0.264 |
| Alcohol consumption, n (%) | 1 (0.7) | 0 (0) | 1 (1.3) | 0.388 |
| Betel nut habit, n (%) | 1 (0.7) | 0 (0) | 1 (1.3) | 0.388 |
Note:
*P<0.05
Laboratory findings of peritoneal dialysis patients with or without oral tori (n = 134).
| Variable | All patients (n = 134) | Patients with oral tori (n = 57) | Patients without oral tori (n = 77) | P value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blood urea nitrogen, mg/dL | 64.8±18.8 | 65.1±21.9 | 64.6±16.3 | 0.883 |
| Creatinine, mg/dL | 13.1±3.5 | 13.4±3.6 | 12.8±3.3 | 0.398 |
| Uric acid, mg/dL | 7.0±1.4 | 7.2±1.5 | 6.8±1.3 | 0.112 |
| Estimated glomerular filtration rate, mL/min/1.73 m2 | 3.9±1.5 | 3.7±1.1 | 4.1±1.7 | 0.112 |
| Sodium, mEq/L | 136.4±4.0 | 136.7±4.1 | 136.2±4.0 | 0.513 |
| Potassium, mEq/L | 4.0±0.7 | 4.0±0.6 | 4.0±0.8 | 0.612 |
| Calcium, mg/dL | 9.6±1.0 | 9.7±1.1 | 9.6±1.0 | 0.858 |
| Inorganic phosphorus, mg/dL | 5.6±1.4 | 5.7±1.4 | 5.6±1.4 | 0.463 |
| Fasting glucose, mg/dL | 107.0±41.7 | 109.8±47.1 | 104.9±37.3 | 0.504 |
| Glycated hemoglobin, % | 5.63±0.87 | 5.61±0.99 | 5.64±0.77 | 0.815 |
| Albumin, g/dL | 3.78±0.42 | 3.79±0.38 | 3.77±0.45 | 0.790 |
| Alkaline phosphatase, U/L | 88.0±58.5 | 83.5±53.8 | 91.3±61.8 | 0.447 |
| Total cholesterol, mg/dL | 187.4±45.2 | 188.8±48.3 | 186.3±43.1 | 0.744 |
| High-density lipoprotein, mg/dL | 42.9±13.6 | 43.9±12.1 | 42.1±14.6 | 0.454 |
| Low-density lipoprotein, mg/dL | 139.0±84.4 | 136.9±75.8 | 140.5±90.8 | 0.808 |
| Triglyceride, mg/dL | 184.9±180.6 | 200.7±196.1 | 173.2±168.5 | 0.385 |
| Aspartate aminotransferase, U/L | 21.8±9.4 | 20.6±7.5 | 22.7±10.6 | 0.180 |
| Alanine aminotransferase, U/L | 17.3±7.8 | 16.1±5.8 | 18.1±8.9 | 0.115 |
| Intact parathyroid hormone, pg/mL | 382.1±421.5 | 317.3±292.0 | 430.1±492.6 | 0.126 |
| Iron, ug/dL | 81.9±36.8 | 82.3±32.6 | 81.7±39.9 | 0.923 |
| Total iron binding capacity, ug/dL | 280.5±61.3 | 270.3±62.2 | 288.0±59.9 | 0.098 |
| Ferritin, ng/mL | 391.6±595.6 | 369.6±289.7 | 407.9±747.2 | 0.714 |
| White blood cell count, 103/uL | 7.7±2.6 | 7.7±2.5 | 7.8±2.8 | 0.792 |
| Red blood cell count, 106/uL | 3.5±0.6 | 3.4±0.5 | 3.6±0.6 | 0.118 |
| Hemoglobin, g/dL | 10.2±1.4 | 10.1±1.3 | 10.3±1.5 | 0.391 |
| Hematocrit, % | 30.4±4.3 | 29.9±4.2 | 30.8±4.3 | 0.229 |
| Mean corpuscular volume, fL | 86.6±7.1 | 87.1±5.8 | 86.3±7.9 | 0.462 |
| Mean corpuscular hemoglobin, pg/Cell | 29.1±2.7 | 29.4±2.2 | 28.9±3.0 | 0.213 |
| Mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration, gHb/dL | 33.6±1.1 | 33.8±1.0 | 33.4±1.1 | 0.082 |
| Red blood cell distribution width, % | 14.5±1.5 | 14.3±1.1 | 14.7±1.7 | 0.147 |
| Platelet count, 103/uL | 228.0±81.2 | 231.8±84.3 | 225.2±79.4 | 0.645 |
| High sensitivity C-reactive protein, mg/L | 8.7±16.3 | 6.6±8.2 | 10.3±20.2 | 0.147 |
Note: P<0.05
Dialysis-related data of peritoneal dialysis patients with or without oral tori (n = 134).
| Variable | All patients (n = 134) | Patients with oral tori (n = 57) | Patients without oral tori (n = 77) | P value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dialysate/plasma creatinine | 0.66 ± 0.11 | 0.65± 0.11 | 0.67± 0.11 | 0.224 |
| Peritoneal equilibration test | 0.098 | |||
| High, n (%) | 13 (9.7%) | 3 (5.3%) | 10 (13.0%) | |
| High average, n (%) | 58 (43.3%) | 21 (36.8%) | 37 (48.0%) | |
| Low average, n (%) | 55 (41.0%) | 30 (52.6%) | 25 (32.5%) | |
| Low, n (%) | 8 (6.0%) | 3 (5.3%) | 5 (6.5%) | |
| Weekly Kt/Vurea | 2.12± 0.35 | 2.14 ± 0.39 | 2.11 ± 0.33 | 0.533 |
| Weekly creatinine clearance rate, L/1.73 m2 | 58.88± 15.16 | 59.31 ± 17.58 | 58.57 ± 13.20 | 0.781 |
Note: Kt/Vurea is a number used to quantify peritoneal dialysis treatment adequacy. K dialyzer clearance of urea. t dialysis time. V volume of distribution of urea.
Clinical findings of oral tori (n = 57).
| Variable | ||
|---|---|---|
| Type | ||
| TP, n (%) | 46 (80.7) | |
| TM, n (%) | 3 (5.3) | |
| TP+TM, n (%) | 8 (14.0) | |
| Symmetric occurrence | TP (n = 54) | TM (n = 11) |
| Symmetric, n (%) | 54 (100.0) | 11 (100.0) |
| Size | TP (n = 54) | TM (n = 11) |
| <2cm, n (%) | 32 (59.3) | 9 (81.9) |
| >2cm, n (%) | 22 (40.7) | 2 (18.1) |
| Shape | TP (n = 54) | TM (n = 11) |
| Flat, n (%) | 29 (53.7) | 0 (0) |
| Spindle, n (%) | 9 (16.7) | 2 (18.2) |
| Nodular, n (%) | 11 (20.3) | 4 (36.4) |
| Lobular, n (%) | 5 (9.3) | 5 (45.4) |
| Location | TP (n = 54) | TM (n = 11) |
| Incisor, n (%) | 1 (1.9) | 0 (0) |
| Premolar, n (%) | 22 (40.7) | 7 (63.6) |
| Molar, n (%) | 5 (9.3) | 0 (0) |
| Incisor + premolar, n (%) | 3 (5.5) | 4 (36.4) |
| Premolar + molar, n (%) | 18 (33.3) | 0 (0) |
| Incisor + premolar +molar, n (%) | 5 (9.3) | 0 (0) |
Note: TP torus palatinus, TM torus mandibularis
Comparison of prevalence rate of oral tori from different studies.
| Study | Year | Geographic area | Sample size, | Population | TP, % (female) | TM, % (female) | Age, year |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eggen et al. [ | 1986 | Norwegian | 829 | Nonuremic | 32.8 (68.3) | 27.5 (54.5) | |
| Reichart et al. [ | 1988 | German | 1317 | Nonuremic | 13.5 (60.1) | 5.2 (24.6) | 1->80 |
| Reichart et al. [ | 1988 | Thailand | 947 | Nonuremic | 23.1 (70.8) | 9.2 (56.3) | 1->80 |
| Haugen et al. [ | 1992 | Norway | 5000 | Nonuremic | 9.2 (67.6) | 7.2 (49.0) | 16–89 |
| Eggen et al [ | 1994 | Norwegian | 1181 | Nonuremic | 38.4 (60.1) | 12.7 (43.1) | |
| Gorsky et al. [ | 1996 | Israel | 1002 | Nonuremic | 21.0 (63.9) | 4–40 | |
| Al-Bayaty [ | 2001 | India | 667 | Nonuremic | 9.4 (73.0) | 5.7 (55.2) | 11–50 |
| Bruce et al. [ | 2004 | Ghana | 926 | Nonuremic | 3.9 (74.2) | 12.1 (55.2) | |
| Yildiz et al. [ | 2005 | Turkey | 1943 | Nonuremic | 30.9 (50.7) | 5–15 | |
| Jainkittivong et al. [ | 2007 | Thailand | 1520 | Nonuremic | 60.5 (62.8) | 32.2 (48.1) | 10–60 |
| Sisman et al. [ | 2008 | Turkey | 2660 | Nonuremic | 4.1 (81.8) | 13–85 | |
| Yoshinaka et al. [ | 2010 | Japan | 664 | Nonuremic | 17.0 (80.5) | 29.7 (46.7) | 60–82 |
| Simunkovic et al [ | 2011 | Croatia | 1679 | Nonuremic | 42.9 (54.8) | 12.6 (52.6) | 9–99 |
| Hiremath et al. [ | 2011 | Malaysia | 65 | Nonuremic | 50.8 (90.9) | 4.6 (66.7) | 13–59 |
| Sisman et al. [ | 2012 | Turkey | 91 | Uremic | 41.7 (55.3) | 19–81 | |
| Sathya et al. [ | 2012 | Malaysia | 1532 | Nonuremic | 12.0 (64.7) | 2.8 (65.1) | 10->40 |
| Chiang et al. [ | 2014 | Taiwan | 2050 | Nonuremic | 21.1 (76.2) | 24.2 (52.1) | <18->65 |
| Chao et al. [ | 2014 | Taiwan | 119 | Uremic | 23.5(56.2) | 6.7 (41.7) | 9–90 |
| Present study | 2015 | Taiwan | 135 | Uremic | 40.3(63.0) | 8.2 (54.5) | 9–81.7.9 |
Note: Note: TP torus palatinus, TM torus mandibularis
* radiographic study