| Literature DB >> 27275294 |
Danche Vasileva1, Daniela Lubenova2, Marija Mihova3, Antoaneta Dimitrova2, Kristin Grigorova-Petrova2.
Abstract
AIM: The study aims to trace the influence of specialized kinesitherapeutic methodology (SKTM) on balance reactions in patients with ischemic stroke in the chronic period (ISChP).Entities:
Keywords: Balance reactions; Chronic period; Ischemic stroke; Kinesitherapy; Neurodevelopmental treatment; Physical activity
Year: 2015 PMID: 27275294 PMCID: PMC4877894 DOI: 10.3889/oamjms.2015.105
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Open Access Maced J Med Sci ISSN: 1857-9655
Clinical characteristics of the contingent at the beginning of the study
| Age | Weight | Height | Brunnstrom- upper limb | Brunnstrom - lower limb | Ashworth – upper limb | Ashworth – lower limb |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| X̄±SD | X̄±SD | X̄±SD | X̄±SD | X̄±SD | X̄±SD | X̄±SD |
| 63.2±8.8 | 77.9±10.1 | 169.2±6.4 | 4.2±0.7 | 4.8±0.6 | 1.6±0.6 | 1.1±0.5 |
X̄± SD – average value and standard deviation.
Prospective evaluation of static and functional balance in the scale of Berg, before and after the kinesitherapy (in points)
| Parameters | At the beginning (n=56) | 10th day (n=56) | 1st month (n=56) | 3rd month (n=56) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| X̄±SD | X̄±SD | X̄±SD | X̄±SD | |
| Standing with collected feet (Berg 7) | 1.7±0.7 | 3.6±0.4 | 4.0±0.1 | 3.9±0.1 |
| Standing with eyes closed (Berg 6) | 1.4±0.5 | 3.3±0.5 | 3.9±0.1 | 3.9±0.2 |
| Standing tandem (Berg 13) | 1.5±1.1 | 3.3±0.7 | 3.6±0.4 | 3.6±0.4 |
| Standing on one leg (Berg 14) | 0.6±0.4 | 2.7±0.7 | 3.4±0.5 | 3.4±0.5 |
| Getting up from seating to standing (Berg 1) | 2.1±1.0 | 3.8±0.3 | 4.0±0.1 | 4.0±0.5 |
| Standing without support (Berg 2) | 2.9±1.0 | 3.8±0.3 | 4.0±0.2 | 4.0±0.4 |
| Sitting without back support - feet on the floor (Berg 3) | 3.9±0.9 | 3.8±0.4 | 4.0±0.2 | 4.0±0.4 |
| Sitting posture of (Berg 4) | 1.7±0.5 | 3.7±0.4 | 4.0±0.2 | 4.0±0.5 |
| Moving forward from the seating of the chair (Berg 5) | 2.4±0.6 | 3.9±0.2 | 4.0±0.3 | 4.0±0.4 |
| Reaching forward with outstretched hands (Berg 8) | 1.7±0.6 | 3.7±0.4 | 4.0±0.2 | 4.0±0.5 |
| Lifting from the floor by standing (Berg 9) | 1.8±1.1 | 3.5±0.6 | 3.9±0.2 | 3.8±0.3 |
| Rotate from standing (Berg 10) | 1.6±0.6 | 3.7±0.4 | 4.0±0.1 | 4.0±0.1 |
| Rotate for 360 ° (Berg11) | 1.8±0.8 | 3.5±0.6 | 3.8±0.3 | 3.8±0.3 |
| Of standing without support with hands- stepping on a block sequentially with both feet (Berg 12) | 1.4±1.0 | 3.1±0.9 | 3.6±0.4 | 3.6±0.4 |
X̄ ± SD – average value and standard deviation,
p <0.001 = significant difference compared with baseline values.
Prospective evaluation of the total number of points on the Berg Balance Scale, before and after kinesitherapy (in points)
| Parameters | At the beginning (n=56) | 10th day (n=56) | 1st month (n=56) | 3rd month (n=56) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| X̄±SD | X̄±SD | X̄±SD | X̄±SD | |
| Total Points | 26.85±9.02 | 49.92±5.67 | 54.57±1.71 | 54.32±2.07 |
X̄ ± SD - averagevalue and standard deviation,
p <0.001 = significant difference compared with baseline values.
Figure 1Change in the total number of points for static and functional balance, according to the scale of Berg presented as a ratio of the results and the initial (baseline) values; *** P <0.001 - a significant difference compared to the initial (baseline) values.