| Literature DB >> 27275225 |
Detelina Valchkova Lukanova1, Nadelin Krasimirov Nikolov1, Kameliya Zaharieva Genova2, Mario Draganov Stankev1, Elisaveta Valcheva Georgieva2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The stroke is leading cause of death and severe disability worldwide. Atherosclerosis is responsible for over 30% of all ischemic strokes. It has been recently discovered that plaque morphology may help predict the clinical behavior of carotid atherosclerosis and determine the risk of stroke. The noninvasive imaging techniques have been developed to evaluate the vascular wall in an attempt to identify "vulnerable plaques". AIM: The purpose is to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound, multidetector computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in the identification of plaque components associated with plaque vulnerability.Entities:
Keywords: carotid; noninvasive imaging; vulnerable plaque
Year: 2015 PMID: 27275225 PMCID: PMC4877857 DOI: 10.3889/oamjms.2015.039
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Open Access Maced J Med Sci ISSN: 1857-9655
Figure 1Unstable soft plaque type I with a deep ulcer causing 95% ICA stenosis in symptomatic 67 years old male with recurrent ipsilateral stroke with B-mode, Color Duplex Sonography and corresponding histological section.
Figure 2MDCT of right ICA with unstable plaque with lipid core and ulcer with lumen stenosis of 77%. Left - Multilevel Reconstructed Image. Middle – automated classification computer algorithm derived overlay shows lipid core (blue), blood products (red), calcification (yellow) and connective tissue (green). Right - axial section at the level of the plaque.
Figure 3MRI of unstable carotid plaque in 67 years old symptomatic male, with ulceration (type VIa), occluding 95% of the lumen of the left ICA. It consists of a large lipid core, plaque hemorrhage and a thin fibrous cap (enhanced on postcontrast T1), in which a small area is interrupted (ulceration).
Diagnostic value of imaging modalities.
| Study | Sensitivity | Specificity |
|---|---|---|
| CDS | 94% | 93% |
| CDS - U | 78% | 96% |
| MDCT | 83% | 73% |
| MDCT - U | 91% | 95% |
| MDCT - C | 73% | 83% |
| MRI | 100% | 89% |
| MRI - L | 93% | 94% |
| MRI - H | 92% | 94% |
| MRI - U | 78% | 91% |
U- ulcer, L – lipids, C – calcium, H – hemorrhage.
Characteristics of noninvasive imaging modalities.
| Imaging modality | Costs (€) | Time (min) | Advantages | Disadvantages |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US | 40 | 20 | - Accessible | - Difficult |
| MDCT | 150 | 55 | - Accessible | - Toxic contrasts |
| MRI | 220 | 70 | - Measures the thickness of the fibrous cap | - Poor image quality |
US – ultrasound, MDCT - Multidetector computed tomography, MRI - Magnetic resonance imaging.
Figure 4Diagnostic algoritm for extracranial stenosis.