Simon Rice1, Jo Robinson2, Sarah Bendall2, Sarah Hetrick2, Georgina Cox2, Eleanor Bailey2, John Gleeson3, Mario Alvarez-Jimenez2. 1. Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health; Centre for Youth Mental Health; The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; Youth Mood Clinic, Orygen Youth Health, Melbourne, Australia. 2. Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health; Centre for Youth Mental Health; The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia. 3. School of Psychology, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Australia.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Suicide remains a major global public health issue for young people. The reach and accessibility of online and social media-based interventions herald a unique opportunity for suicide prevention. To date, the large body of research into suicide prevention has been undertaken atheoretically. This paper provides a rationale and theoretical framework (based on the interpersonal theory of suicide), and draws on our experiences of developing and testing online and social media-based interventions. METHOD: The implementation of three distinct online and social media-based intervention studies, undertaken with young people at risk of suicide, are discussed. We highlight the ways that these interventions can serve to bolster social connectedness in young people, and outline key aspects of intervention implementation and moderation. RESULTS: Insights regarding the implementation of these studies include careful protocol development mindful of risk and ethical issues, establishment of suitably qualified teams to oversee development and delivery of the intervention, and utilisation of key aspects of human support (i.e., moderation) to encourage longer-term intervention engagement. CONCLUSIONS: Online and social media-based interventions provide an opportunity to enhance feelings of connectedness in young people, a key component of the interpersonal theory of suicide. Our experience has shown that such interventions can be feasibly and safely conducted with young people at risk of suicide. Further studies, with controlled designs, are required to demonstrate intervention efficacy.
OBJECTIVE: Suicide remains a major global public health issue for young people. The reach and accessibility of online and social media-based interventions herald a unique opportunity for suicide prevention. To date, the large body of research into suicide prevention has been undertaken atheoretically. This paper provides a rationale and theoretical framework (based on the interpersonal theory of suicide), and draws on our experiences of developing and testing online and social media-based interventions. METHOD: The implementation of three distinct online and social media-based intervention studies, undertaken with young people at risk of suicide, are discussed. We highlight the ways that these interventions can serve to bolster social connectedness in young people, and outline key aspects of intervention implementation and moderation. RESULTS: Insights regarding the implementation of these studies include careful protocol development mindful of risk and ethical issues, establishment of suitably qualified teams to oversee development and delivery of the intervention, and utilisation of key aspects of human support (i.e., moderation) to encourage longer-term intervention engagement. CONCLUSIONS: Online and social media-based interventions provide an opportunity to enhance feelings of connectedness in young people, a key component of the interpersonal theory of suicide. Our experience has shown that such interventions can be feasibly and safely conducted with young people at risk of suicide. Further studies, with controlled designs, are required to demonstrate intervention efficacy.
Entities:
Keywords:
early intervention; online intervention; social media; suicide prevention; youth mental health
Authors: Jo Robinson; Sarah Hetrick; Georgina Cox; Sarah Bendall; Hok Pan Yuen; Alison Yung; Jane Pirkis Journal: Early Interv Psychiatry Date: 2014-03-31 Impact factor: 2.732
Authors: Jo Robinson; Sarah Hetrick; Georgina Cox; Sarah Bendall; Alison Yung; Jane Pirkis Journal: Early Interv Psychiatry Date: 2014-03-31 Impact factor: 2.732
Authors: Barbara Stanley; Gregory Brown; David A Brent; Karen Wells; Kim Poling; John Curry; Betsy D Kennard; Ann Wagner; Mary F Cwik; Anat Brunstein Klomek; Tina Goldstein; Benedetto Vitiello; Shannon Barnett; Stephanie Daniel; Jennifer Hughes Journal: J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 2009-10 Impact factor: 8.829
Authors: Megan Andreas Moreno; Dimitri A Christakis; Katie G Egan; Lauren A Jelenchick; Elizabeth Cox; Henry Young; Hope Villiard; Tara Becker Journal: J Behav Health Serv Res Date: 2012-07 Impact factor: 1.505
Authors: Simon M Rice; Joanne Goodall; Sarah E Hetrick; Alexandra G Parker; Tamsyn Gilbertson; G Paul Amminger; Christopher G Davey; Patrick D McGorry; John Gleeson; Mario Alvarez-Jimenez Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2014-09-16 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Benjamin Dickter; Eduardo L Bunge; Lisa M Brown; Yan Leykin; Erin E Soares; Benjamin Van Voorhees; Monika Marko-Holguin; Tracy R G Gladstone Journal: Mhealth Date: 2019-05-07
Authors: Sarah Bendall; Mario Alvarez-Jimenez; Lee Valentine; Carla McEnery; Shaunagh O'Sullivan; John Gleeson Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2020-06-26 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Rina Dutta; George Gkotsis; Sumithra Velupillai; Ioannis Bakolis; Robert Stewart Journal: BMC Psychiatry Date: 2021-05-19 Impact factor: 4.144
Authors: Louise La Sala; Zoe Teh; Michelle Lamblin; Gowri Rajaram; Simon Rice; Nicole T M Hill; Pinar Thorn; Karolina Krysinska; Jo Robinson Journal: PLoS One Date: 2021-06-15 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Simon Rice; John Gleeson; Steven Leicester; Sarah Bendall; Simon D'Alfonso; Tamsyn Gilbertson; Eoin Killackey; Alexandra Parker; Reeva Lederman; Greg Wadley; Olga Santesteban-Echarri; Ingrid Pryor; Daveena Mawren; Aswin Ratheesh; Mario Alvarez-Jimenez Journal: JMIR Res Protoc Date: 2018-02-22