Literature DB >> 27274675

Effect of Semi-Rigid and Soft Ankle Braces on Static and Dynamic Postural Stability in Young Male Adults.

Noriaki Maeda1, Yukio Urabe1, Shogo Tsutsumi1, Shuhei Numano1, Miho Morita1, Takuya Takeuchi1, Shou Iwata1, Toshiki Kobayashi2.   

Abstract

Ankle braces have been suggested to protect ankle joints from a sprain by restricting inversion and improving proprioception. However, the difference in effects between a semi-rigid brace and a soft brace regarding dynamic postural control after landing is not known. The aim of the present study was to compare the effect of soft (SB) and semi-rigid (SRB) ankle braces on static and dynamic postural stability in healthy young men. Altogether, 21 male adults (mean age 24.0 ± 1.5 years) were assessed for one leg while wearing non-brace (NB), SB or SRB. Balance in single-limb stance on a single-force platform with open eyes and closed eyes were assessed for the non-dominant leg under SB, SRB, and NB conditions. Locus length/second (mm/s) and the enveloped area (mm·s(-2)) surrounded by the circumference of the wave pattern during postural sway were calculated. For assessing dynamic postural stability, the participant jumped and landed on one leg on a force platform, and the Dynamic Postural Stability Index (DPSI) and the maximum vertical ground reaction force (vGRFmax) were measured. The data were compared among the three conditions with repeated-measures analysis of variance. The correlations between locus length/second, enveloped area, DPSI values (DPSI, Anterior-Posterior Stability Index, Medial-Lateral Stability Index, and Vertical Stability Index), and vGRFmax were then calculated. The results indicated that locus length/second and enveloped area with open eyes and closed eyes were not significantly different for each condition. However, a significant lower in the DPSI and Vertical Stability Index were observed with the SRB in comparison to the SB and NB. A significant improvement in vGRFmax was also observed with the SRB in comparison to NB. SRB demonstrated a positive effect on dynamic postural stability after landing on a single leg and may improve balance by increasing dynamic postural stability. Key pointsThis study examined the effect of ankle braces on healthy young individuals during dynamic postural stability using the DPSI.The semi-rigid brace improved dynamic postural stability compared with the soft brace and no brace.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ankle brace; Dynamic Postural Stability Index; dynamic postural balance; static postural balance

Year:  2016        PMID: 27274675      PMCID: PMC4879451     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sports Sci Med        ISSN: 1303-2968            Impact factor:   2.988


  19 in total

1.  Assessment of the Injured Ankle in the Athlete.

Authors:  Scott A Lynch
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.860

2.  The acute effects of different durations of static stretching on dynamic balance performance.

Authors:  Pablo B Costa; Barbara S Graves; Michael Whitehurst; Patrick L Jacobs
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 3.775

3.  Kinematics, kinetics, and electromyogram of ankle during drop landing: a comparison between dominant and non-dominant limb.

Authors:  Wenxin Niu; Yang Wang; Yan He; Yubo Fan; Qinping Zhao
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2011-03-24       Impact factor: 2.161

4.  Effect of orthotics on postural sway following inversion ankle sprain.

Authors:  K M Guskiewicz; D H Perrin
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 4.751

5.  The differential effects of external ankle support on postural control.

Authors:  K L Bennell; P A Goldie
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 4.751

6.  An epidemiological survey on ankle sprain.

Authors:  M S Yeung; K M Chan; C H So; W Y Yuan
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 13.800

7.  Ankle injuries in athletics.

Authors:  R P Mack
Journal:  Clin Sports Med       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 2.182

Review 8.  Acute ankle sprain: an update.

Authors:  Douglas Ivins
Journal:  Am Fam Physician       Date:  2006-11-15       Impact factor: 3.292

Review 9.  Epidemiology of collegiate injuries for 15 sports: summary and recommendations for injury prevention initiatives.

Authors:  Jennifer M Hootman; Randall Dick; Julie Agel
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2007 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.860

Review 10.  What is the evidence for rest, ice, compression, and elevation therapy in the treatment of ankle sprains in adults?

Authors:  Michel P J van den Bekerom; Peter A A Struijs; Leendert Blankevoort; Lieke Welling; C Niek van Dijk; Gino M M J Kerkhoffs
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2012 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.860

View more
  2 in total

1.  The effect of two types of ankle orthoses on the repetitive rebound jump performance.

Authors:  Masanori Morikawa; Noriaki Maeda; Makoto Komiya; Toshiki Kobayashi; Yukio Urabe
Journal:  BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil       Date:  2022-05-16

2.  Does a Passive Unilateral Lower Limb Exoskeleton Affect Human Static and Dynamic Balance Control?

Authors:  Steffen Ringhof; Isabel Patzer; Jonas Beil; Tamim Asfour; Thorsten Stein
Journal:  Front Sports Act Living       Date:  2019-09-20
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.