Literature DB >> 27274578

Numeracy and the Persuasive Effect of Policy Information and Party Cues.

Vittorio Mérola1, Matthew P Hitt1.   

Abstract

Numeric political appeals represent a prevalent but overlooked domain of public opinion research. When can quantitative information change political attitudes, and is this change trumped by partisan effects? We analyze how numeracy-or individual differences in citizens' ability to process and apply numeric policy information-moderates the effectiveness of numeric political appeals on a moderately salient policy issue. Results show that those low in numeracy exhibit a strong party-cue effect, treating numeric information in a superficial and heuristic fashion. Conversely, those high in numeracy are persuaded by numeric information, even when it is sponsored by the opposing party, overcoming the party-cue effect. Our results make clear that overlooking numeric ability when analyzing quantitative political appeals can mask significant persuasion effects, and we build on recent work advancing the understanding of individual differences in public opinion.

Year:  2015        PMID: 27274578      PMCID: PMC4888569          DOI: 10.1093/poq/nfv051

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Public Opin Q        ISSN: 0033-362X


  4 in total

1.  Party over policy: The dominating impact of group influence on political beliefs.

Authors:  Geoffrey L Cohen
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2003-11

2.  Numeracy and decision making.

Authors:  Ellen Peters; Daniel Västfjäll; Paul Slovic; C K Mertz; Ketti Mazzocco; Stephan Dickert
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2006-05

3.  Feeling validated versus being correct: a meta-analysis of selective exposure to information.

Authors:  William Hart; Dolores Albarracín; Alice H Eagly; Inge Brechan; Matthew J Lindberg; Lisa Merrill
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 17.737

4.  Cooperation and contagion in web-based, networked public goods experiments.

Authors:  Siddharth Suri; Duncan J Watts
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-03-11       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total
  3 in total

1.  A massive experiment on choice blindness in political decisions: Confidence, confabulation, and unconscious detection of self-deception.

Authors:  Andrés Rieznik; Lorena Moscovich; Alan Frieiro; Julieta Figini; Rodrigo Catalano; Juan Manuel Garrido; Facundo Álvarez Heduan; Mariano Sigman; Pablo A Gonzalez
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-02-14       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Directionality of information flow and echoes without chambers.

Authors:  Soojong Kim
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-05-15       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  How to Communicate Food Safety after Radiological Contamination: The Effectiveness of Numerical and Narrative News Messages.

Authors:  Hanna Valerie Wolf; Tanja Perko; Peter Thijssen
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-06-12       Impact factor: 3.390

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.