Literature DB >> 27274517

Effective Factors in Severity of Traffic Accident-Related Traumas; an Epidemiologic Study Based on the Haddon Matrix.

Kambiz Masoumi1, Arash Forouzan1, Hassan Barzegari1, Ali Asgari Darian1, Fakher Rahim2, Behzad Zohrevandi3, Somayeh Nabi1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Traffic accidents are the 8(th) cause of mortality in different countries and are expected to rise to the 3(rd) rank by 2020. Based on the Haddon matrix numerous factors such as environment, host, and agent can affect the severity of traffic-related traumas. Therefore, the present study aimed to evaluate the effective factors in severity of these traumas based on Haddon matrix.
METHODS: In the present 1-month cross-sectional study, all the patients injured in traffic accidents, who were referred to the ED of Imam Khomeini and Golestan Hospitals, Ahvaz, Iran, during March 2013 were evaluated. Based on the Haddon matrix, effective factors in accident occurrence were defined in 3 groups of host, agent, and environment. Demographic data of the patients and data regarding Haddon risk factors were extracted and analyzed using SPSS version 20.
RESULTS: 700 injured people with the mean age of 29.66 ± 12.64 years (3-82) were evaluated (92.4% male). Trauma mechanism was car-pedestrian in 308 (44%) of the cases and car-motorcycle in 175 (25%). 610 (87.1%) cases were traffic accidents and 371 (53%) occurred in the time between 2 pm and 8 pm. Violation of speed limit was the most common violation with 570 (81.4%) cases, followed by violation of right-of-way in 57 (8.1%) patients. 59.9% of the severe and critical injuries had occurred on road accidents, while 61.3% of the injuries caused by traffic accidents were mild to moderate (p < 0.001). The most common mechanisms of trauma for critical injuries were rollover (72.5%), motorcycle-pedestrian (23.8%), and car-motorcycle (13.14%) accidents (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: Based on the results of the present study, the most important effective factors in severity of traffic accident-related traumas were age over 50, not using safety tools, and undertaking among host-related factors; insufficient environment safety, road accidents and time between 2 pm and 8 pm among environmental factors; and finally, rollover, car-pedestrian, and motorcycle-pedestrian accidents among the agent factors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Wounds and injuries; accidents; risk factors; traffic

Year:  2016        PMID: 27274517      PMCID: PMC4893755     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emerg (Tehran)        ISSN: 2345-4563


Introduction:

Traffic accidents are one of the major causes of disability and mortality in different countries and are considered the 8th cause of mortality in the industrial countries. Based on a statement by World Health Organization (WHO) it is expected to rise to the 3rd rank by 2020 (1, 2). Traffic accidents not only cause millions of disabilities and deaths, and take a toll on the countries’ finance, but are also considered a big problem in the way of improving public health (3-7). Numerous factors such as environmental, vehicle-related, host (driver, pedestrian), and their type of interaction affect the characteristics of these accidents. To accurately identify them, there are solutions such as evaluation of public health, risk factors, and Haddon matrix (8). Among the mentioned solutions, Haddon matrix is the best tool to combine the epidemiologic triangle of the host, agent and environment with 3 stages of prevention before, during and after the accident (9). Based on this tool, special strategies can be designed for road traffic injury prevention. Various studies show that in traffic accidents, pedestrians and young motorcycle riders are most susceptible to injury. A cross-sectional study that evaluated traffic accident injuries over one year, showed that about 98.9% of the injured were men with the mean age of 30 years (10). A similar study revealed that factors such as age over 45 years, weather condition, type of accident and road conditions significantly correlated with severity of injury (11). In a study by Hatamabadi et al., the biggest mortality rate by far, belonged to pedestrians (12). Ahvaz city, southeast Iran, is located in an accident-prone location, and there are not enough studies regarding traffic accident characteristics in this city. Therefore, the present study aimed to evaluate the effective factors in severity of traffic accident-related traumas based on Haddon matrix.

Methods:

In the present 1-month cross-sectional study, all traffic accident trauma patients in, who were referred to the emergency department (ED) of Imam Khomeini and Golestan Hospitals, Ahvaz, Iran, during March 2013 were evaluated. The present study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences. Based on the Haddon matrix, effective factors in incidence of traffic accidents were defined in 3 groups of host-, agent-, and environment-related (table 1). The severity of injury was calculated using injury severity score (ISS). Traumas with a score of 1-9 were categorized as mild, 10-15 as moderate, 16-25 as severe, and over 25 as critical (13). Patients were included from equal morning and night shifts (20 patients from each shift on average). Demographic data of the patients and data regarding risk factors based on Haddon matrix were extracted and recorded by 3 trained emergency medicine residents using the police and medical files as well as asking the patient or their relatives. Patients with missing data were excluded from the study. After gathering the data, they were recorded and analyzed using SPSS version 20. Descriptive indices were described using frequency, percentage, and mean ± standard deviation, and qualitative ones were compared using chi square test. P < 0.05 was considered as significance level. To reserve patient rights, all the researchers adhered to the principles of Helsinki Declaration and kept patient information confidential.
Table 1:

Effective risk factors in occurrence of accident based on the Haddon matrix

Category Risk factors
Host Age, using safety tools (helmet in motorcycle riders, seat belt in drivers) and moving violation (violation of speed limit, undertaking, crossing over a center divider, violation of right-of-way)
Agent Accident type (pedestrian car , pedestrian motorcycle, 2 motorcycles, 2 cars, falling down)
Environment Safety of the accident location (pedestrian line or footbridge, traffic light, guard rail, proper road construction, proper lighting), weather conditions at the location (time of accident), place of accident (traffic or road)

Results:

700 traffic accident trauma patients, with the mean age of 29.66 ± 12.64 years (range: 3 - 82) were admitted to the afore-mentioned EDs during 1 month (92.4% male). Trauma mechanism was pedestrian-car in 308 (44%) of the cases and car-motorcycle in 175 (25%). 610 (87.1%) cases were urban accidents and 371 (53%) occurred in the time between 2 pm and 8 pm. Violation of speed limit was the most common violation with 570 (81.4%) cases, followed by violation of right-of-way in 57 (8.1%) patients. All the drivers used seat belts (100%), while only 84.23% of the motorcycle riders used helmets. Table 2 shows the distribution of traffic accident injuries based on age; sex; type, time, and location of accident; severity of injury; and type of safety tools and moving violation. 59.9% of the severe and critical injuries had occurred in road accidents, while 61.3% of traffic ones were mild to moderate (p < 0.001). 14 (70%) of the accidents that had occurred in locations without proper safety, had led to severe to critical injuries. While in safe locations, 405 (59.5%) cases had mild to moderate injuries (p = 0.013). Undertaking, crossing over a center divider, violation of right-of-way, and violating speed limit were the cause of 65.51%, 27.27%, 22.8%, and 19.28% of the critical injuries, respectively (p < 0.001). The most common mechanisms of trauma for critical injuries were rollover (72.5%), motorcycle-pedestrian (23.8%), and car-motorcycle (13.14%) accidents (p < 0.001). Table 3 summarizes the effects of environment-, host-, and agent-related factors based on collision severity.
Table 2

Baseline characteristics of patients

Characteristicsn (%)
Age group (years)
     < 16 37 (5.3)
     17-30387 (55.3)
     30-40154 (22)
     40-5066 (9.4)
     50-6539 (5.6)
     ≥ 6517 (2.4)
Sex
     Male 647 (92.4)
     Female 53 (7.6)
Type of accident
     Car-pedestrian308 (44)
     Car-motorcycle175 (25)
     Rollover 80 (11.4)
     Car-car48 (6.9)
     Motorcycle-motorcycle47 (6.7)
     Motorcycle-pedestrian42 (6)
Location
     Traffic accident610 (87.1)
     Road accident90 (12.9)
Time of accident (hour)
     8 am – 2 pm245 (35)
     2 pm – 8 pm371 (53)
     8 pm – 8 am84 (12)
Injury score*
     1 - 9 (mild)197 (28.1)
     10 - 15 (moderate)214 (30.6)
     16 - 25 (severe)137 (19.6)
     > 25 (critical)152 (21.7)
Using safety tools
     Seat belt128 (100)
     Helmet 187 (84.23)
Moving violation
     Speed limit violation570 (81.4)
     Violation of right-of-way57 (8.1)
     Crossing over a center divider44 (6.3)
     Undertaking 29 (4.1)

Based on injury severity score (ISS).

Table 3

The effects of Haddon matrix factors on injury severity

Accident characteristics Injury severity based on ISS * (%)
P
Mild Moderate Severe Critical
Environment Location safety
     Negative 2 (10)4 (20)4 (20)10 (50)0.013
     Positive 195 (28.7)210 (30.9)133 (19.5)142 (20.9)
Location
     Urban road15 (16.7)22 (24.4)19 (21.1)34 (37.8)0.001
     Inter-city road182 (29.8)192 (31.5)118 (19.3)118 (19.3)
Time (hour)
     8 am – 2 pm81 (33.1)78 (31.8)40(16.3)46 (18.8)0.001
     2 pm – 8 pm100 (27)124 (33.4)84 (22.6)63 (17)
     8 pm – 8 am16 (19)12 (14.3)13 (15.5)43 (51.2)
Host Age (year) 0.036
     < 16 12 (32.4)14 (37.8)6 (16.2)5 (13.5)
     17-30119 (30.7)115 (29.7)74 (19.1)79 (20.4)
     30-4039 (25.3)52 (33.8)33 (21.4)30 (19.5)
     40-5014 (21.2)23 (34.8)7 (10.6)22 (33.3)
     50-657 (17.9)9 (23.1)13 (33.3)10 (25.6)
     ≥ 656 (35.3)1(5.9)4 (23.5)6 (35.3)
Using safety tools
Seat beltNo00000.001
Yes 30 (23.4)24 (18.7)10 (7.8)64 (50)
HelmetNo 010 (28.6)19 (54.3)6 (17.1)
Yes35 (19.5)68 (38)61 (34.1)23 (12.8)
Moving violation
     Speed limit 160 (28.6)186 (33.2)116 (21.7)108 (19.3)0.001
     Undertaking2 (6.9)6 (20.7)2 (6.9)19 (65.5)
     Crossing** 18 (40.9)11 (25)3 (6.8)12 (27.3)
     Right-of-way17 (29.8)11 (19.3)16 (28.1)13 (22.8)
Agent Mechanism of injury
     Car-pedestrian121 (39.3)102 (33.1)46 (14.9)39 (12.7)0.001
     Car-motorcycle35 (20)61 (34.8)56 (32)23 (13.1)
     2 motorcycles017 (36.2)24 (51.1)6 (12.8)
     2 cars25 (52.1)13 (27.1)4 (8.3)6 (1.2)
     Motor-pedestrian11 (26.2)10 (23.8)11 (26.2)10 (23.8)
     Rollover 5 (6.2)11 (13.7)6 (7.5)58 (72.5)

ISS: injury severity score,

crossing over a center divider.

Discussion:

Results of the present study showed that the severity of injuries cause by traffic accidents is in correlation with factors such as age, accident location, type of accident, time of accident, and type of moving violation. In addition, mean injury severity in this study was estimated to be moderate to severe. Most of the injured were young men under 40 years old, which was similar to a study by Kumar et al. and some other studies (10, 11). In other countries, even western ones, men are far more susceptible to injury caused by accidents. In this study, most patients were injured in car-pedestrian accidents, which is in line with another study that reported vehicles hitting pedestrians as the most common cause of injury (14). Yet, some studies have introduced motorcycle accidents as the most common cause of trauma (15, 16). Although car-motorcycle accidents had a high frequency in this study, car-pedestrian accidents were the most common. This emphasizes the importance of educating pedestrians, either in schools or through the media, to decrease pedestrian mortality, especially among children and teenagers. The results of the study carried out on 343082 accident cases in Iran in 2006 showed that, 276000 were injured in traffic accidents. 56% of the accidents were caused by the collision of 2 vehicles, 64.5% happened due to violation of the traffic rules, and 34% occurred at the time of sunrise or sunset (3). Most of the accidents in the present study had occurred in the evening (2 pm to 8 pm), which was in line with the 2006 study regarding frequency of accidents at sunrise and sunset (4). In the present study, most common moving violation was speed violation. Injury severity in traffic and road accidents was significantly different, which is in line with the results of a study by Wang et al. that evaluated 568 cases in 1 year. They expressed that age over 45 years, migrated population, weather conditions, type of accident, and road conditions significantly correlated with severe accident injuries (11). In this study, injury severity significantly correlated with type of accident, and critical injuries were mostly due to rollover, which is in line with the Wong et al. study (11). Unsafe environment of the location of accident also showed a significant correlation with trauma severity, similar to the results of Wang et al. (11). Analyses showed that type of moving violation and severity of injury significantly correlated and violation of speed resulted in more severe injuries. In addition, severity of injury varied significantly among different age groups. The most severe injuries belonged to people in the > 50 age group. This was in contrast with the results of a study done in China that reported age under 45 correlated with injury severity. Injury severity was significantly higher in midnight accidents (8 pm to 8 am). Apparently, planning to eliminate or decrease environment-, host-, and agent-related risk factors leading to severe and critical traumas in the first phase, and mild and moderate ones later, can considerably decrease financial and health-related costs of traffic accidents. Educating the society using educational programs and encouragement/punishment, improving road conditions and eliminating its accident hot zones, revising the maximum age allowed for driving, planning special traffic rules for motorcycle riders and reinforcing limitations, and controlling traffic in accident-prone times (2 pm – 8 pm) can be helpful in this regard. The short duration of the study and small sample size are among the limitations of this study. It is recommended to design more general and national studies with larger sample size to be able to identify the correlations of these factors more accurately and decrease traffic accidents and consequently injuries resulting from them.

Conclusion:

Based on the results of the present study, the most important effective factors in severity of traffic accident-related traumas were age over 50, not using safety tools, and undertaking among host-related factors; insufficient environment safety, road accidents and time between 2 pm and 8 pm among environmental factors; and finally, rollover, car-pedestrian, and motorcycle-pedestrian accidents among the agent factors. Effective risk factors in occurrence of accident based on the Haddon matrix Baseline characteristics of patients Based on injury severity score (ISS). The effects of Haddon matrix factors on injury severity ISS: injury severity score, crossing over a center divider.
  9 in total

1.  Pre-hospital trauma care resources for road traffic injuries in a middle-income country--a province based study on need and access in Iran.

Authors:  Hassan Haghparast Bidgoli; Lennart Bogg; Marie Hasselberg
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2010-06-02       Impact factor: 2.586

2.  Perceived susceptibility to and perceived causes of road traffic injuries in an urban and rural area of Tanzania.

Authors:  Anne Nordrehaug Astrøm; Candida Moshiro; Yusuf Hemed; Ivar Heuch; Gunnar Kvåle
Journal:  Accid Anal Prev       Date:  2005-08-19

3.  Incidence and risk factors of severe traumatic brain injury resulting from road accidents: a population-based study.

Authors:  Etienne Javouhey; Anne-Céline Guérin; Mireille Chiron
Journal:  Accid Anal Prev       Date:  2005-10-18

4.  Road traffic injuries: a major global public health crisis.

Authors:  B R Sharma
Journal:  Public Health       Date:  2008-10-31       Impact factor: 2.427

5.  The injury severity score: a method for describing patients with multiple injuries and evaluating emergency care.

Authors:  S P Baker; B O'Neill; W Haddon; W B Long
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  1974-03

6.  Epidemiologic study of road traffic injuries by road user type characteristics and road environment in Iran: a community-based approach.

Authors:  Hamidreza Hatamabadi; Reza Vafaee; Mashyaneh Hadadi; Ali Abdalvand; Hamidreza Esnaashari; Hamid Soori
Journal:  Traffic Inj Prev       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 1.491

7.  Determinants of traffic injuries in drivers and motorcyclists involved in an accident.

Authors:  Reza Majdzadeh; Kazem Khalagi; Kamran Naraghi; Abbas Motevalian; Mohammad Reza Eshraghian
Journal:  Accid Anal Prev       Date:  2007-05-07

8.  Factors affecting anatomical region of injury, severity, and mortality for road trauma in a high-income developing country: lessons for prevention.

Authors:  Hani O Eid; Peter Barss; Shehabeldin H Adam; Fawaz Chikh Torab; Karl Lunsjo; Michal Grivna; Fikri M Abu-Zidan
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2008-12-30       Impact factor: 2.586

9.  The Most Important Causes of Death in Iranian Population; a Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Soheil Saadat; Mahmoud Yousefifard; Hadi Asady; Ali Moghadas Jafari; Mohammad Fayaz; Mostafa Hosseini
Journal:  Emerg (Tehran)       Date:  2015
  9 in total
  4 in total

1.  The Cost Analysis of Patients with Traffic Traumatic Injuries Presenting to Emergency Department; a Cross-sectional Study.

Authors:  Farhad Rahmati; Mohammad Doosti; Maryam Bahreini
Journal:  Adv J Emerg Med       Date:  2018-11-17

2.  The association between meteorological variables and road traffic injuries: a study from Macao.

Authors:  Chon-Fu Lio; Hou-Hon Cheong; Chon-Hou Un; Iek-Long Lo; Shin-Yi Tsai
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2019-02-12       Impact factor: 2.984

3.  Comparison the Ability of Quantitative Trauma Severity Assessment Methods Based On GAP, RTS, and ISS Criteria in Determining the Prognosis of Accidental Patients.

Authors:  Behrang Khafafi; Omid Garkaz; Saeed Golfiroozi; Sahar Paryab; Laia Ashouri; Sevda Daei; Hamidreza Mehryar; Mousa Ghelichi-Ghojogh
Journal:  Bull Emerg Trauma       Date:  2022-07

4.  Injury severity levels and associated factors among road traffic collision victims referred to emergency departments of selected public hospitals in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: the study based on the Haddon matrix.

Authors:  Ararso Baru; Aklilu Azazh; Lemlem Beza
Journal:  BMC Emerg Med       Date:  2019-01-03
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.