Literature DB >> 27273206

Conventional intensive logging promotes loss of organic carbon from the mineral soil.

Christopher Dean1, James B Kirkpatrick1, Andrew J Friedland2.   

Abstract

There are few data, but diametrically opposed opinions, about the impacts of forest logging on soil organic carbon (SOC). Reviews and research articles conclude either that there is no effect, or show contradictory effects. Given that SOC is a substantial store of potential greenhouse gasses and forest logging and harvesting is routine, resolution is important. We review forest logging SOC studies and provide an overarching conceptual explanation for their findings. The literature can be separated into short-term empirical studies, longer-term empirical studies and long-term modelling. All modelling that includes major aboveground and belowground biomass pools shows a long-term (i.e. ≥300 years) decrease in SOC when a primary forest is logged and then subjected to harvesting cycles. The empirical longer-term studies indicate likewise. With successive harvests the net emission accumulates but is only statistically perceptible after centuries. Short-term SOC flux varies around zero. The long-term drop in SOC in the mineral soil is driven by the biomass drop from the primary forest level but takes time to adjust to the new temporal average biomass. We show agreement between secondary forest SOC stocks derived purely from biomass information and stocks derived from complex forest harvest modelling. Thus, conclusions that conventional harvests do not deplete SOC in the mineral soil have been a function of their short time frames. Forest managers, climate change modellers and environmental policymakers need to assume a long-term net transfer of SOC from the mineral soil to the atmosphere when primary forests are logged and then undergo harvest cycles. However, from a greenhouse accounting perspective, forest SOC is not the entire story. Forest wood products that ultimately reach landfill, and some portion of which produces some soil-like material there rather than in the forest, could possibly help attenuate the forest SOC emission by adding to a carbon pool in landfill.
© 2016 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  carbon accounting; carbon emissions; forest carbon cycle; forest conversion; harvesting cycles; long-term; primary forest; soil carbon; soil organic carbon

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27273206     DOI: 10.1111/gcb.13387

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Glob Chang Biol        ISSN: 1354-1013            Impact factor:   10.863


  3 in total

1.  Forest biomass carbon stocks and variation in Tibet's carbon-dense forests from 2001 to 2050.

Authors:  Xiangyang Sun; Genxu Wang; Mei Huang; Ruiying Chang; Fei Ran
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-10-05       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Novel 3D geometry and models of the lower regions of large trees for use in carbon accounting of primary forests.

Authors:  Christopher Dean; Jamie B Kirkpatrick; Jon Osborn; Richard B Doyle; Nicholas B Fitzgerald; Stephen H Roxburgh
Journal:  AoB Plants       Date:  2018-02-28       Impact factor: 3.276

3.  Increasing biomass demand enlarges negative forest nutrient budget areas in wood export regions.

Authors:  Wagner de Oliveira Garcia; Thorben Amann; Jens Hartmann
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-03-27       Impact factor: 4.379

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.