Jeanette W Kirk1,2,3, Ditte M Sivertsen4, Janne Petersen4,5, Per Nilsen6, Helle V Petersen4. 1. Optimed, Clinical Research Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital, Hvidovre, Denmark. jeanette.wassar.kirk@regionh.dk. 2. Department of Development and Quality, University Hospital, Hvidovre, Denmark. jeanette.wassar.kirk@regionh.dk. 3. Department of Education, Aarhus University, Emdrup, Denmark. jeanette.wassar.kirk@regionh.dk. 4. Optimed, Clinical Research Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital, Hvidovre, Denmark. 5. Section of Biostatistics, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark. 6. Division of Community Medicine, Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Abstract
AIM: The aim was to identify the factors that were perceived as most important as facilitators or barriers to the introduction and intended use of a new tool in the emergency department among nurses and a geriatric team. BACKGROUND: A high incidence of functional decline after hospitalisation for acute medical illness has been shown in the oldest patients and those who are physically frail. In Denmark, more than 35% of older medical patients acutely admitted to the emergency department are readmitted within 90 days after discharge. A new screening tool for use in the emergency department aiming to identify patients at particularly high risk of functional decline and readmission was developed. DESIGN: Qualitative study based on semistructured interviews with nurses and a geriatric team in the emergency department and semistructured single interviews with their managers. METHODS: The Theoretical Domains Framework guided data collection and analysis. Content analysis was performed whereby new themes and themes already existing within each domain were described. RESULTS: Six predominant domains were identified: (1) professional role and identity; (2) beliefs about consequences; (3) goals; (4) knowledge; (5) optimism and (6) environmental context and resources. The content analysis identified three themes, each containing two subthemes. The themes were professional role and identity, beliefs about consequences and preconditions for a successful implementation. CONCLUSIONS: Two different cultures were identified in the emergency department. These cultures applied to different professional roles and identity, different actions and sense making and identified how barriers and facilitators linked to the new screening tool were perceived. RELEVANCE FOR CLINICAL PRACTICE: The results show that different cultures exist in the same local context and influence the perception of barriers and facilitators differently. These cultures must be identified and addressed when implementation is planned.
AIM: The aim was to identify the factors that were perceived as most important as facilitators or barriers to the introduction and intended use of a new tool in the emergency department among nurses and a geriatric team. BACKGROUND: A high incidence of functional decline after hospitalisation for acute medical illness has been shown in the oldest patients and those who are physically frail. In Denmark, more than 35% of older medical patients acutely admitted to the emergency department are readmitted within 90 days after discharge. A new screening tool for use in the emergency department aiming to identify patients at particularly high risk of functional decline and readmission was developed. DESIGN: Qualitative study based on semistructured interviews with nurses and a geriatric team in the emergency department and semistructured single interviews with their managers. METHODS: The Theoretical Domains Framework guided data collection and analysis. Content analysis was performed whereby new themes and themes already existing within each domain were described. RESULTS: Six predominant domains were identified: (1) professional role and identity; (2) beliefs about consequences; (3) goals; (4) knowledge; (5) optimism and (6) environmental context and resources. The content analysis identified three themes, each containing two subthemes. The themes were professional role and identity, beliefs about consequences and preconditions for a successful implementation. CONCLUSIONS: Two different cultures were identified in the emergency department. These cultures applied to different professional roles and identity, different actions and sense making and identified how barriers and facilitators linked to the new screening tool were perceived. RELEVANCE FOR CLINICAL PRACTICE: The results show that different cultures exist in the same local context and influence the perception of barriers and facilitators differently. These cultures must be identified and addressed when implementation is planned.
Authors: Lisette M van Leeuwen; Marieke Pronk; Paul Merkus; S Theo Goverts; Johannes R Anema; Sophia E Kramer Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-12-11 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Julia Crilly; Jaimi H Greenslade; Sara Berndt; Tracey Hawkins; Louise Cullen Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2020-01-31 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Kathleen Lane; Christine Bond; David Wright; David P Alldred; James Desborough; Richard Holland; Carmel Hughes; Fiona Poland Journal: Health Soc Care Community Date: 2020-03-02
Authors: Patrick Kierkegaard; Timothy Hicks; A Joy Allen; Yaling Yang; Gail Hayward; Margaret Glogowska; Brian D Nicholson; Peter Buckle Journal: Implement Sci Commun Date: 2021-12-18
Authors: Elizabeth McInnes; Simeon Dale; Louise Craig; Rosemary Phillips; Oyebola Fasugba; Verena Schadewaldt; N Wah Cheung; Dominique A Cadilhac; Jeremy M Grimshaw; Chris Levi; Julie Considine; Patrick McElduff; Richard Gerraty; Mark Fitzgerald; Jeanette Ward; Catherine D'Este; Sandy Middleton Journal: Implement Sci Date: 2020-11-04 Impact factor: 7.327
Authors: Chantal Backman; Krista R Wooller; Delvina Hasimja-Saraqini; Melissa Demery Varin; Michelle Crick; Danielle Cho-Young; Lisa Freeman; Lori Delaney; Janet E Squires Journal: Nurs Open Date: 2021-05-14