Literature DB >> 27273061

Postoperative environmental anesthetic vapour concentrations following removal of the airway device in the operating room versus the postanesthesia care unit.

Sara K Cheung1, Timur Özelsel2, Saifee Rashiq3, Ban C Tsui3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study was designed to compare waste anesthetic gas (WAG) concentrations within patients' breathing zones after removal of the patient's airway device in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU) vs in the operating room (OR).
METHODS: Following Research Ethics Board approval and patient consent, we recruited patients undergoing surgery who received volatile anesthesia via an endotracheal tube or supraglottic airway. Patients had their airway device removed in the OR or in the PACU depending on the attending anesthesiologist's preference. Upon the patient's arrival in the PACU, concentrations of exhaled sevoflurane and desflurane were measured at their breathing zone (i.e., 15 cm from the patient's mouth and nose) using a single-beam infrared spectrophotometer.
RESULTS: Seventy patients were recruited during the five-month study period. The median [interquartile range] WAG levels in the patients' breathing zones were higher when their airway devices were removed in the PACU vs in the OR. The WAG levels for sevoflurane were 0.7 [0.4-1.1] parts per million (ppm) vs 0.5 [0.4-0.7] ppm, respectively; median difference, 0.3; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.1 to 0.6; P = 0.04. The WAG levels for desflurane were 2.4 [1.2-3.4] ppm vs 4.1 [2.5-5.2] ppm, respectively; median difference, 1.5; 95% CI, 0.3 to 2.7; P = 0.04.
CONCLUSIONS: After a volatile-based anesthetic, our results suggest that removal of the airway device in the PACU vs in the OR increases the amount of waste anesthetic gas in a patient's breathing zone and thus potentially in the PACU nurse's working zone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27273061     DOI: 10.1007/s12630-016-0678-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Anaesth        ISSN: 0832-610X            Impact factor:   5.063


  2 in total

Review 1.  Waste anesthetic gas exposure and strategies for solution.

Authors:  Hai-Bo Deng; Feng-Xian Li; Ye-Hua Cai; Shi-Yuan Xu
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 2.078

2.  [Waste anesthetic gas exposure: the risks extend outside the operating room].

Authors:  Hilary P Grocott
Journal:  Braz J Anesthesiol       Date:  2018-04-06
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.