Literature DB >> 2727272

Studies of the mortality of A-bomb survivors. 9. Mortality, 1950-1985: Part 1. Comparison of risk coefficients for site-specific cancer mortality based on the DS86 and T65DR shielded kerma and organ doses.

Y Shimizu1, H Kato, W J Schull, D L Preston, S Fujita, D A Pierce.   

Abstract

As a result of the reassessment of the A-bomb dosimetry, new (DS86) doses were calculated in 1986. In this paper, site-specific estimates of cancer mortality in the years 1950-1985, based on these new doses, are compared with those using the T65DR doses. The subjects of the study are 75,991 members of the Life Span Study sample for whom DS86 doses have been calculated. This reevaluation of the exposures does not change the list of radiation-related cancers. Most differences in dose response between Hiroshima and Nagasaki are no longer significant with the DS86 doses. The dose-response curve is closer to linear with the DS86 than the T65DR doses even for leukemia in the entire dose range, though, statistically, many other models cannot be excluded. However, in the low-dose range, the risk of leukemia remains nonlinear. Assuming a linear model at an RBE of 1, and using organ-absorbed doses, the risk coefficients derived from the two dosimetries are very similar, whereas those based on shielded kerma are about 40% higher with the new dosimetry. If RBE values larger than 1 are assumed, the disparity between the two dosimetries increases because the neutron dose is much greater in the T65DR. At an RBE of 10, for the five specific cancers, i.e., female breast, colon, leukemia, lung, and stomach, the increase in excess number of deaths per 10(4) PYSv under the DS86 varies from 12% (colon) to 133% (female breast). The magnitude of the effects of such modifiers of radiation-induced cancer as age at time of bomb and sex do not differ between the two dose systems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2727272

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Res        ISSN: 0033-7587            Impact factor:   2.841


  15 in total

Review 1.  Radiation carcinogenesis in experimental animals.

Authors:  J J Broerse; D W van Bekkum; C Zurcher
Journal:  Experientia       Date:  1989-01-15

Review 2.  Induction of mammary tumors by ionising radiation.

Authors:  D W van Bekkum; J J Broerse
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.925

3.  Hiroshima survivors exposed to very low doses of A-bomb primary radiation showed a high risk for cancers.

Authors:  Tomoyuki Watanabe; Masaru Miyao; Ryumon Honda; Yuichi Yamada
Journal:  Environ Health Prev Med       Date:  2008-07-05       Impact factor: 3.674

4.  Cancer mortality among atomic bomb survivors exposed as children.

Authors:  Hitomi Goto; Tomoyuki Watanabe; Masaru Miyao; Hiromi Fukuda; Yuzo Sato; Yoshiharu Oshida
Journal:  Environ Health Prev Med       Date:  2011-10-25       Impact factor: 3.674

5.  Possible selection effects for radiation risk estimates in Japanese A-bomb survivors: reanalysis of acute radiation symptoms data.

Authors:  Nezahat Hunter; Colin R Muirhead; Wei Zhang
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2006-03-25       Impact factor: 1.925

Review 6.  Carcinogenic risk in diagnostic nuclear medicine: biological and epidemiological considerations.

Authors:  F Overbeek; E K Pauwels; J J Broerse
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  1994-09

7.  The Department of Energy's Comprehensive Epidemiologic Data Resource: a public-use database on radiation exposure.

Authors:  H G Stockwell; B G Brooks; H H Holmes; M J Durst; Y K Shim; P E Heinig
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 9.308

8.  CML as Part of Dual Malignancies-A Retrospective Analysis: Possible Mechanisms and Review of Literature.

Authors:  Kamal Kant Sahu; Yanamandra Uday; Amanjit Bal; Neelam Varma; Shano Naseem; Alka Khadwal; Gaurav Prakash; S Varma; Pankaj Malhotra
Journal:  Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus       Date:  2015-11-21       Impact factor: 0.900

Review 9.  Cancer risk at low doses of ionizing radiation: artificial neural networks inference from atomic bomb survivors.

Authors:  Masao S Sasaki; Akira Tachibana; Shunichi Takeda
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2013-12-22       Impact factor: 2.724

10.  Mass screening for breast cancer: benefits, risks, costs.

Authors:  J Valentin; W Leitz
Journal:  Med Oncol Tumor Pharmacother       Date:  1988
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.